From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@kernel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.1 33/39] pinctrl: mediatek: Ignore interrupts that are wake only during resume
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2019 22:15:08 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190703021514.17727-33-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190703021514.17727-1-sashal@kernel.org>
From: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>
[ Upstream commit 35594bc7cecf3a78504b590e350570e8f4d7779e ]
Before suspending, mtk-eint would set the interrupt mask to the
one in wake_mask. However, some of these interrupts may not have a
corresponding interrupt handler, or the interrupt may be disabled.
On resume, the eint irq handler would trigger nevertheless,
and irq/pm.c:irq_pm_check_wakeup would be called, which would
try to call irq_disable. However, if the interrupt is not enabled
(irqd_irq_disabled(&desc->irq_data) is true), the call does nothing,
and the interrupt is left enabled in the eint driver.
Especially for level-sensitive interrupts, this will lead to an
interrupt storm on resume.
If we detect that an interrupt is only in wake_mask, but not in
cur_mask, we can just mask it out immediately (as mtk_eint_resume
would do anyway at a later stage in the resume sequence, when
restoring cur_mask).
Fixes: bf22ff45bed6 ("genirq: Avoid unnecessary low level irq function calls")
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Sean Wang <sean.wang@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/mtk-eint.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/mtk-eint.c b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/mtk-eint.c
index f464f8cd274b..737385e86beb 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/mtk-eint.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/mtk-eint.c
@@ -318,7 +318,7 @@ static void mtk_eint_irq_handler(struct irq_desc *desc)
struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc);
struct mtk_eint *eint = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc);
unsigned int status, eint_num;
- int offset, index, virq;
+ int offset, mask_offset, index, virq;
void __iomem *reg = mtk_eint_get_offset(eint, 0, eint->regs->stat);
int dual_edge, start_level, curr_level;
@@ -328,10 +328,24 @@ static void mtk_eint_irq_handler(struct irq_desc *desc)
status = readl(reg);
while (status) {
offset = __ffs(status);
+ mask_offset = eint_num >> 5;
index = eint_num + offset;
virq = irq_find_mapping(eint->domain, index);
status &= ~BIT(offset);
+ /*
+ * If we get an interrupt on pin that was only required
+ * for wake (but no real interrupt requested), mask the
+ * interrupt (as would mtk_eint_resume do anyway later
+ * in the resume sequence).
+ */
+ if (eint->wake_mask[mask_offset] & BIT(offset) &&
+ !(eint->cur_mask[mask_offset] & BIT(offset))) {
+ writel_relaxed(BIT(offset), reg -
+ eint->regs->stat +
+ eint->regs->mask_set);
+ }
+
dual_edge = eint->dual_edge[index];
if (dual_edge) {
/*
--
2.20.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-03 2:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20190703021514.17727-1-sashal@kernel.org>
2019-07-03 2:14 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.1 23/39] pinctrl: mcp23s08: Fix add_data and irqchip_add_nested call order Sasha Levin
2019-07-03 2:14 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.1 24/39] pinctrl: ocelot: fix gpio direction for pins after 31 Sasha Levin
2019-07-03 2:15 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.1 25/39] pinctrl: ocelot: fix pinmuxing " Sasha Levin
2019-07-03 2:15 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2019-07-03 2:15 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.1 36/39] pinctrl: mediatek: Update cur_mask in mask/mask ops Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190703021514.17727-33-sashal@kernel.org \
--to=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=drinkcat@chromium.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sean.wang@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).