From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78DA7CA9EC7 for ; Sat, 2 Nov 2019 21:02:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F2AA205C9 for ; Sat, 2 Nov 2019 21:02:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="uLY9BuOF" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726771AbfKBVCK (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Nov 2019 17:02:10 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-f67.google.com ([209.85.128.67]:51171 "EHLO mail-wm1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726523AbfKBVCK (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Nov 2019 17:02:10 -0400 Received: by mail-wm1-f67.google.com with SMTP id 11so12815531wmk.0 for ; Sat, 02 Nov 2019 14:02:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=WUB9JeVGuzH5Bq1mp3V2bq1E6UXztrv5bxAECoqFyMk=; b=uLY9BuOFrVwYNv+xrAeRHiSc1LGmgOwXrGwJopxhE1YN+qRLZkcx+exU8P/uhsDqbd lBcmQKm54wGMQS/iNTytODG4lhJztVy4uV4EUVo3yWdgzpozVxx8iJhUj9vBW4GZcSm7 PSvXh89w3UGMMVgnMY50JuOqn2fIBIQRi/sq6jJwJh+PSIGol+Fg4/VZdKv/pbtAumf6 8hyqhmUKt0EneWykkhbd9WOArxwT02pKCE/7xnKiPHswmIVebBl5Zddbxuv8TTfDNLcB Zwn4dUybvphPIK9PpmsqwBsc0IMXv/lTkfCMbvOGi3obJlzetJ2fNl1dLj8F+bDP+oX9 wq5Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=WUB9JeVGuzH5Bq1mp3V2bq1E6UXztrv5bxAECoqFyMk=; b=nAT/8//B/+7adbxK/gxHyQditg2EhXq1231FyzPlTQzpFh4tWXRFxeWm9hwuaJXLj9 CU2806fwqS5TMeot4wtvm5aMSrm9yrd+mgY5IMw3SirpkLUiyoQfhMlHRBGiJQjW4Lty PQp9+SIH2rbideu6V+DkLTlrwKHJcPGzps/OhpwXr8ucDTVr+conURMlYG2Yx/sdfrFK sYvAUVRfw0Zuzja2AmEG9jBIGKBhS+xr0Wpeade7aTdRyvGi0pnHBSYJuLtc0fdo95F5 rvDWc+YoRSQvfCQdZO7oiCmAkGTMzHLqXY/DdQgzCqElA1HLK1JQ5sDw5eTTZGuBHkp1 YX2A== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXExsVQIl4MQCphGT+BhWFUs38I4BlN/feKrpewWRwXtQpgKY79 /4Bmc4Q6q7HVdhc0Oms/vJ0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzmUNmwust/pI+t3gVmmCEMQmjZLvsrw2ZvvjOVmHu5HpYuhFLdg5+HKQXNREAC2DJlxyF0ZA== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:cbc5:: with SMTP id n5mr16766175wmi.65.1572728528394; Sat, 02 Nov 2019 14:02:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from x1 ([2001:16b8:5c81:5b01:94f5:1750:1271:5d0e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v81sm12254760wmg.4.2019.11.02.14.02.07 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 02 Nov 2019 14:02:07 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2019 22:02:05 +0100 From: Drew Fustini To: Kent Gibson Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] gpio: add new SET_CONFIG ioctl() to gpio chardev Message-ID: <20191102210205.GA26757@x1> References: <20191031144825.32105-1-warthog618@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191031144825.32105-1-warthog618@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-gpio-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 10:48:23PM +0800, Kent Gibson wrote: > The patch series is against Bart's gpio/for-next branch[1] with v4 of > my bias patch series "gpio: expose line bias flags to userspace" applied. > This is necessary to support setting of the bias flags introduced > there. I'd like to apply this to test but I wanted to check should I still be applying all the patches from "[PATCH v4 0/5] gpio: expose line bias flags to userspace"? thanks, drew