From: Kent Gibson <warthog618@gmail.com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Bamvor Jian Zhang <bamv2005@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: gpio-mockup: Fix usage of new GPIO_LINE_DIRECTION
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2019 09:16:15 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191211011615.GA9373@sol> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191210145515.GB3509@sol>
On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 10:55:15PM +0800, Kent Gibson wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 03:11:12PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > wt., 10 gru 2019 o 03:15 Kent Gibson <warthog618@gmail.com> napisał(a):
> > >
> > > Restore the external behavior of gpio-mockup to what it was prior to the
> > > change to using GPIO_LINE_DIRECTION.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Kent Gibson <warthog618@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > Fix a regression introduced in v5.5-rc1.
> > >
> > > The change to GPIO_LINE_DIRECTION reversed the polarity of the
> > > dir field within gpio-mockup.c, but overlooked inverting the value on
> > > initialization and when returned by gpio_mockup_get_direction.
> > > The latter is a bug.
> > > The former is a problem for tests which assume initial conditions,
> > > specifically the mockup used to initialize chips with all lines as inputs.
> > > That superficially appeared to be the case after the previous patch due
> > > to the bug in gpio_mockup_get_direction.
> > >
> > > drivers/gpio/gpio-mockup.c | 7 +++++--
> > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mockup.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mockup.c
> > > index 56d647a30e3e..c4fdc192ea4e 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mockup.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mockup.c
> > > @@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ static int gpio_mockup_get_direction(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset)
> > > int direction;
> > >
> > > mutex_lock(&chip->lock);
> > > - direction = !chip->lines[offset].dir;
> > > + direction = chip->lines[offset].dir;
> > > mutex_unlock(&chip->lock);
> > >
> > > return direction;
> > > @@ -395,7 +395,7 @@ static int gpio_mockup_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > struct gpio_chip *gc;
> > > struct device *dev;
> > > const char *name;
> > > - int rv, base;
> > > + int rv, base, i;
> > > u16 ngpio;
> > >
> > > dev = &pdev->dev;
> > > @@ -447,6 +447,9 @@ static int gpio_mockup_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > if (!chip->lines)
> > > return -ENOMEM;
> > >
> > > + for (i = 0; i < gc->ngpio; i++)
> > > + chip->lines[i].dir = GPIO_LINE_DIRECTION_IN;
> > > +
> > > if (device_property_read_bool(dev, "named-gpio-lines")) {
> > > rv = gpio_mockup_name_lines(dev, chip);
> > > if (rv)
> > > --
> > > 2.24.0
> > >
> >
> > Hi Kent,
> >
> > I was applying and testing your libgpiod series and noticed that the
> > gpio-tools tests fail after applying patches 16 & 17 (with linux
> > v5.5-rc1). Is this fix related to this?
> >
>
> I don't think so. I've only been able to trip this problem with a
> couple of corner cases in my Go uapi test suite.
> I have been unable to reproduce it with the tools as it requires
> multiple requests with the same chip fd, including an as-is, to trip.
>
It turns out that I can reproduce the bug with my gpiod tools:
root@firefly:/home/kent/gpiod/cmd/gpiodctl# uname -a
Linux firefly 5.5.0-rc1 #23 SMP Mon Dec 9 16:26:33 UTC 2019 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
root@firefly:/home/kent/gpiod/cmd/gpiodctl# modprobe gpio-mockup gpio_mockup_ranges=-1,4
root@firefly:/home/kent/gpiod/cmd/gpiodctl# ./gpiodctl get gpiochip0 1
0
root@firefly:/home/kent/gpiod/cmd/gpiodctl# ./gpiodctl info
gpiochip0 - 4 lines:
line 0: unnamed unused input active-high
line 1: unnamed unused input active-high
line 2: unnamed unused input active-high
line 3: unnamed unused input active-high
root@firefly:/home/kent/gpiod/cmd/gpiodctl# ./gpiodctl get --as-is gpiochip0 1
0
root@firefly:/home/kent/gpiod/cmd/gpiodctl# ./gpiodctl info
gpiochip0 - 4 lines:
line 0: unnamed unused input active-high
line 1: unnamed unused output active-high
line 2: unnamed unused input active-high
line 3: unnamed unused input active-high
Note that the line 1 direction has flipped for no reason.
With the patched kernel that doesn't happen:
root@firefly:/home/kent/gpiod/cmd/gpiodctl# uname -a
Linux firefly 5.5.0-rc1+ #27 SMP Tue Dec 10 01:07:59 UTC 2019 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
root@firefly:/home/kent/gpiod/cmd/gpiodctl# modprobe gpio-mockup gpio_mockup_ranges=-1,4
root@firefly:/home/kent/gpiod/cmd/gpiodctl# ./gpiodctl get gpiochip0 1
0
root@firefly:/home/kent/gpiod/cmd/gpiodctl# ./gpiodctl info
gpiochip0 - 4 lines:
line 0: unnamed unused input active-high
line 1: unnamed unused input active-high
line 2: unnamed unused input active-high
line 3: unnamed unused input active-high
root@firefly:/home/kent/gpiod/cmd/gpiodctl# ./gpiodctl get --as-is gpiochip0 1
0
root@firefly:/home/kent/gpiod/cmd/gpiodctl# ./gpiodctl info
gpiochip0 - 4 lines:
line 0: unnamed unused input active-high
line 1: unnamed unused input active-high
line 2: unnamed unused input active-high
line 3: unnamed unused input active-high
I would prefer to demonstrate this with the libgpiod tools, but they
don't support as-is on gets. I recall suggesting adding it and you
asking why - who would need it. This is a concrete example of my
response at the time - so you can exercise the full API for testing.
Cheers,
Kent.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-11 1:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-10 2:15 [PATCH] gpio: gpio-mockup: Fix usage of new GPIO_LINE_DIRECTION Kent Gibson
2019-12-10 14:11 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2019-12-10 14:55 ` Kent Gibson
2019-12-10 15:34 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2019-12-10 23:36 ` Kent Gibson
2019-12-11 1:16 ` Kent Gibson [this message]
2019-12-10 17:26 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191211011615.GA9373@sol \
--to=warthog618@gmail.com \
--cc=bamv2005@gmail.com \
--cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
--cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).