From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1] gpiolib: Optimize gpiochip_remove() when check for requested line
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 13:47:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200225114725.839-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> (raw)
Here are the following optimizations have been done:
- break the loop after first found requested line
- due to above, drop redundant boolean variable
- replace open coded variant of gpiochip_is_requested()
- due to above, drop redundant pointer to struct gpio_desc
- use 'unsigned int' instead of 'unsigned' for loop counter
Note, pointer to struct gpio_chip followed by pointer to struct gpio_device
is still valid, back link is not.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 11 ++++-------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
index 26fe775e4bab..c98902a13f6f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
@@ -1819,10 +1819,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpiochip_get_data);
void gpiochip_remove(struct gpio_chip *chip)
{
struct gpio_device *gdev = chip->gpiodev;
- struct gpio_desc *desc;
unsigned long flags;
- unsigned i;
- bool requested = false;
+ unsigned int i;
/* FIXME: should the legacy sysfs handling be moved to gpio_device? */
gpiochip_sysfs_unregister(gdev);
@@ -1842,13 +1840,12 @@ void gpiochip_remove(struct gpio_chip *chip)
spin_lock_irqsave(&gpio_lock, flags);
for (i = 0; i < gdev->ngpio; i++) {
- desc = &gdev->descs[i];
- if (test_bit(FLAG_REQUESTED, &desc->flags))
- requested = true;
+ if (gpiochip_is_requested(chip, i))
+ break;
}
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gpio_lock, flags);
- if (requested)
+ if (i == gdev->ngpio)
dev_crit(&gdev->dev,
"REMOVING GPIOCHIP WITH GPIOS STILL REQUESTED\n");
--
2.25.0
next reply other threads:[~2020-02-25 11:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-25 11:47 Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2020-02-28 22:59 ` [PATCH v1] gpiolib: Optimize gpiochip_remove() when check for requested line Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200225114725.839-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).