* [PATCH v1] gpiolib: Optimize gpiochip_remove() when check for requested line
@ 2020-02-25 11:47 Andy Shevchenko
2020-02-28 22:59 ` Linus Walleij
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Andy Shevchenko @ 2020-02-25 11:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linus Walleij, Bartosz Golaszewski, linux-gpio; +Cc: Andy Shevchenko
Here are the following optimizations have been done:
- break the loop after first found requested line
- due to above, drop redundant boolean variable
- replace open coded variant of gpiochip_is_requested()
- due to above, drop redundant pointer to struct gpio_desc
- use 'unsigned int' instead of 'unsigned' for loop counter
Note, pointer to struct gpio_chip followed by pointer to struct gpio_device
is still valid, back link is not.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 11 ++++-------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
index 26fe775e4bab..c98902a13f6f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
@@ -1819,10 +1819,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpiochip_get_data);
void gpiochip_remove(struct gpio_chip *chip)
{
struct gpio_device *gdev = chip->gpiodev;
- struct gpio_desc *desc;
unsigned long flags;
- unsigned i;
- bool requested = false;
+ unsigned int i;
/* FIXME: should the legacy sysfs handling be moved to gpio_device? */
gpiochip_sysfs_unregister(gdev);
@@ -1842,13 +1840,12 @@ void gpiochip_remove(struct gpio_chip *chip)
spin_lock_irqsave(&gpio_lock, flags);
for (i = 0; i < gdev->ngpio; i++) {
- desc = &gdev->descs[i];
- if (test_bit(FLAG_REQUESTED, &desc->flags))
- requested = true;
+ if (gpiochip_is_requested(chip, i))
+ break;
}
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gpio_lock, flags);
- if (requested)
+ if (i == gdev->ngpio)
dev_crit(&gdev->dev,
"REMOVING GPIOCHIP WITH GPIOS STILL REQUESTED\n");
--
2.25.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1] gpiolib: Optimize gpiochip_remove() when check for requested line
2020-02-25 11:47 [PATCH v1] gpiolib: Optimize gpiochip_remove() when check for requested line Andy Shevchenko
@ 2020-02-28 22:59 ` Linus Walleij
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Linus Walleij @ 2020-02-28 22:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andy Shevchenko; +Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski, open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 12:47 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> Here are the following optimizations have been done:
> - break the loop after first found requested line
> - due to above, drop redundant boolean variable
> - replace open coded variant of gpiochip_is_requested()
> - due to above, drop redundant pointer to struct gpio_desc
> - use 'unsigned int' instead of 'unsigned' for loop counter
>
> Note, pointer to struct gpio_chip followed by pointer to struct gpio_device
> is still valid, back link is not.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Looks neat!
Patch applied.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-02-28 22:59 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-02-25 11:47 [PATCH v1] gpiolib: Optimize gpiochip_remove() when check for requested line Andy Shevchenko
2020-02-28 22:59 ` Linus Walleij
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).