linux-gpio.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
To: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Brian Masney <masneyb@onstation.org>,
	Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] gpiolib: Fix irq_disable() semantics
Date: Fri,  6 Mar 2020 14:23:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200306132326.1329640-1-linus.walleij@linaro.org> (raw)

The implementation if .irq_disable() which kicks in between
the gpiolib and the driver is not properly mimicking the
expected semantics of the irqchip core: the irqchip will
call .irq_disable() if that exists, else it will call
mask_irq() which first checks if .irq_mask() is defined
before calling it.

Since we are calling it unconditionally, we get this bug
from drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-ssbi-gpio.c, as it only
defines .irq_mask_ack and not .irq_mask:

Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000000
pgd = (ptrval)
(...)
PC is at 0x0
LR is at gpiochip_irq_disable+0x20/0x30

Fix this by only calling .irq_mask() if it exists.

Cc: Brian Masney <masneyb@onstation.org>
Cc: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 461c1a7d4733 ("gpiolib: override irq_enable/disable")
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 9 ++++++++-
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
index bdbc1649eafa..d0bb962f42d5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
@@ -2169,9 +2169,16 @@ static void gpiochip_irq_disable(struct irq_data *d)
 {
 	struct gpio_chip *chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
 
+	/*
+	 * Since we override .irq_disable() we need to mimic the
+	 * behaviour of __irq_disable() in irq/chip.c.
+	 * First call .irq_disable() if it exists, else mimic the
+	 * behaviour of mask_irq() which calls .irq_mask() if
+	 * it exists.
+	 */
 	if (chip->irq.irq_disable)
 		chip->irq.irq_disable(d);
-	else
+	else if (chip->irq.chip->irq_mask)
 		chip->irq.chip->irq_mask(d);
 	gpiochip_disable_irq(chip, d->hwirq);
 }
-- 
2.24.1


             reply	other threads:[~2020-03-06 13:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-06 13:23 Linus Walleij [this message]
2020-03-11 12:39 ` [PATCH] gpiolib: Fix irq_disable() semantics Bartosz Golaszewski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200306132326.1329640-1-linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --to=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
    --cc=hans.verkuil@cisco.com \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=masneyb@onstation.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).