From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/4] gpio: pch: Get rid of unneeded variable in IRQ handler
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 20:48:58 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200414174900.5099-2-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200414174900.5099-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
There is no need to have an additional variable in IRQ handler. We may simple
rely on the fact of having non-zero register value we read from the hardware.
While here, drop repetitive messages in time critical function.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
---
v2: no change
drivers/gpio/gpio-pch.c | 13 +++++++------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pch.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pch.c
index 03eeacdb04fb..708272db6baf 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pch.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pch.c
@@ -303,14 +303,15 @@ static irqreturn_t pch_gpio_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
{
struct pch_gpio *chip = dev_id;
unsigned long reg_val = ioread32(&chip->reg->istatus);
- int i, ret = IRQ_NONE;
+ int i;
- for_each_set_bit(i, ®_val, gpio_pins[chip->ioh]) {
- dev_dbg(chip->dev, "[%d]:irq=%d status=0x%lx\n", i, irq, reg_val);
+ dev_dbg(chip->dev, "irq=%d status=0x%lx\n", irq, reg_val);
+
+ reg_val &= BIT(gpio_pins[chip->ioh]) - 1;
+ for_each_set_bit(i, ®_val, gpio_pins[chip->ioh])
generic_handle_irq(chip->irq_base + i);
- ret = IRQ_HANDLED;
- }
- return ret;
+
+ return IRQ_RETVAL(reg_val);
}
static int pch_gpio_alloc_generic_chip(struct pch_gpio *chip,
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-14 17:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-14 17:48 [PATCH v2 1/4] gpio: pch: Use BIT() and GENMASK() where it's appropriate Andy Shevchenko
2020-04-14 17:48 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2020-04-14 17:48 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] gpio: pch: Refactor pch_irq_type() to avoid unnecessary locking Andy Shevchenko
2020-04-14 17:49 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] gpio: pch: Use in pch_irq_type() macros provided by IRQ core Andy Shevchenko
2020-04-16 8:27 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] gpio: pch: Use BIT() and GENMASK() where it's appropriate Linus Walleij
2020-04-16 10:53 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-04-16 12:20 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200414174900.5099-2-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).