From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Subject: [PATCH v2] gpio: aggregator: Refactor ->{get,set}_multiple() to make Sparse happy
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 14:43:53 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200810114353.48761-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> (raw)
Sparse can't see locking scheme used in ->get_multiple() and
->set_multiple() callbacks.
CHECK .../drivers/gpio/gpio-aggregator.c
.../spinlock.h:409:9: warning: context imbalance in 'gpio_fwd_get_multiple' - unexpected unlock
.../spinlock.h:409:9: warning: context imbalance in 'gpio_fwd_set_multiple' - unexpected unlock
Refactor them to have better readability and make Sparse happy.
Code size impact is +52 bytes with arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc 7.5.0.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
---
v2: fixed indentation, added tag and code size summary (Geert)
drivers/gpio/gpio-aggregator.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-aggregator.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-aggregator.c
index 424a3d25350b..dfd8a4876a27 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-aggregator.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-aggregator.c
@@ -333,20 +333,14 @@ static int gpio_fwd_get(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset)
return gpiod_get_value(fwd->descs[offset]);
}
-static int gpio_fwd_get_multiple(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned long *mask,
+static int gpio_fwd_get_multiple(struct gpiochip_fwd *fwd, unsigned long *mask,
unsigned long *bits)
{
- struct gpiochip_fwd *fwd = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
- unsigned long *values, flags = 0;
struct gpio_desc **descs;
+ unsigned long *values;
unsigned int i, j = 0;
int error;
- if (chip->can_sleep)
- mutex_lock(&fwd->mlock);
- else
- spin_lock_irqsave(&fwd->slock, flags);
-
/* Both values bitmap and desc pointers are stored in tmp[] */
values = &fwd->tmp[0];
descs = (void *)&fwd->tmp[BITS_TO_LONGS(fwd->chip.ngpio)];
@@ -356,16 +350,32 @@ static int gpio_fwd_get_multiple(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned long *mask,
descs[j++] = fwd->descs[i];
error = gpiod_get_array_value(j, descs, NULL, values);
- if (!error) {
- j = 0;
- for_each_set_bit(i, mask, fwd->chip.ngpio)
- __assign_bit(i, bits, test_bit(j++, values));
- }
+ if (error)
+ return error;
- if (chip->can_sleep)
+ j = 0;
+ for_each_set_bit(i, mask, fwd->chip.ngpio)
+ __assign_bit(i, bits, test_bit(j++, values));
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int gpio_fwd_get_multiple_locked(struct gpio_chip *chip,
+ unsigned long *mask, unsigned long *bits)
+{
+ struct gpiochip_fwd *fwd = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
+ unsigned long flags;
+ int error;
+
+ if (chip->can_sleep) {
+ mutex_lock(&fwd->mlock);
+ error = gpio_fwd_get_multiple(fwd, mask, bits);
mutex_unlock(&fwd->mlock);
- else
+ } else {
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&fwd->slock, flags);
+ error = gpio_fwd_get_multiple(fwd, mask, bits);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fwd->slock, flags);
+ }
return error;
}
@@ -377,19 +387,13 @@ static void gpio_fwd_set(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset, int value)
gpiod_set_value(fwd->descs[offset], value);
}
-static void gpio_fwd_set_multiple(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned long *mask,
+static void gpio_fwd_set_multiple(struct gpiochip_fwd *fwd, unsigned long *mask,
unsigned long *bits)
{
- struct gpiochip_fwd *fwd = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
- unsigned long *values, flags = 0;
struct gpio_desc **descs;
+ unsigned long *values;
unsigned int i, j = 0;
- if (chip->can_sleep)
- mutex_lock(&fwd->mlock);
- else
- spin_lock_irqsave(&fwd->slock, flags);
-
/* Both values bitmap and desc pointers are stored in tmp[] */
values = &fwd->tmp[0];
descs = (void *)&fwd->tmp[BITS_TO_LONGS(fwd->chip.ngpio)];
@@ -400,11 +404,23 @@ static void gpio_fwd_set_multiple(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned long *mask,
}
gpiod_set_array_value(j, descs, NULL, values);
+}
- if (chip->can_sleep)
+static void gpio_fwd_set_multiple_locked(struct gpio_chip *chip,
+ unsigned long *mask, unsigned long *bits)
+{
+ struct gpiochip_fwd *fwd = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ if (chip->can_sleep) {
+ mutex_lock(&fwd->mlock);
+ gpio_fwd_set_multiple(fwd, mask, bits);
mutex_unlock(&fwd->mlock);
- else
+ } else {
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&fwd->slock, flags);
+ gpio_fwd_set_multiple(fwd, mask, bits);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fwd->slock, flags);
+ }
}
static int gpio_fwd_set_config(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset,
@@ -470,9 +486,9 @@ static struct gpiochip_fwd *gpiochip_fwd_create(struct device *dev,
chip->direction_input = gpio_fwd_direction_input;
chip->direction_output = gpio_fwd_direction_output;
chip->get = gpio_fwd_get;
- chip->get_multiple = gpio_fwd_get_multiple;
+ chip->get_multiple = gpio_fwd_get_multiple_locked;
chip->set = gpio_fwd_set;
- chip->set_multiple = gpio_fwd_set_multiple;
+ chip->set_multiple = gpio_fwd_set_multiple_locked;
chip->base = -1;
chip->ngpio = ngpios;
fwd->descs = descs;
--
2.28.0
next reply other threads:[~2020-08-10 11:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-10 11:43 Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2020-08-18 19:40 ` [PATCH v2] gpio: aggregator: Refactor ->{get,set}_multiple() to make Sparse happy Bartosz Golaszewski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200810114353.48761-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).