From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/3] pinctrl: intel: Split intel_pinctrl_add_padgroups() for better maintenance
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2021 15:40:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210108134005.30048-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> (raw)
Currently the intel_pinctrl_add_padgroups() is twisted a bit due to
a different nature of the pin control hardware implementations. Thus,
its maintenance is a bit hard. Besides that some pieces of code
are run on all hardware and make this code slightly inefficient,
and moreover, validation for one case is done in a wrong time in a flow
which makes it even slower.
Split intel_pinctrl_add_padgroups() to two functions, one per hardware
implementation, for better maintenance and readability.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
---
v2: added tag (Mika)
drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-intel.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-intel.c b/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-intel.c
index b6ef1911c1dd..ae13e4390935 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-intel.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-intel.c
@@ -1321,34 +1321,19 @@ static int intel_gpio_probe(struct intel_pinctrl *pctrl, int irq)
return 0;
}
-static int intel_pinctrl_add_padgroups(struct intel_pinctrl *pctrl,
- struct intel_community *community)
+static int intel_pinctrl_add_padgroups_by_gpps(struct intel_pinctrl *pctrl,
+ struct intel_community *community)
{
struct intel_padgroup *gpps;
- unsigned int npins = community->npins;
unsigned int padown_num = 0;
- size_t ngpps, i;
-
- if (community->gpps)
- ngpps = community->ngpps;
- else
- ngpps = DIV_ROUND_UP(community->npins, community->gpp_size);
+ size_t i, ngpps = community->ngpps;
gpps = devm_kcalloc(pctrl->dev, ngpps, sizeof(*gpps), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!gpps)
return -ENOMEM;
for (i = 0; i < ngpps; i++) {
- if (community->gpps) {
- gpps[i] = community->gpps[i];
- } else {
- unsigned int gpp_size = community->gpp_size;
-
- gpps[i].reg_num = i;
- gpps[i].base = community->pin_base + i * gpp_size;
- gpps[i].size = min(gpp_size, npins);
- npins -= gpps[i].size;
- }
+ gpps[i] = community->gpps[i];
if (gpps[i].size > 32)
return -EINVAL;
@@ -1366,6 +1351,38 @@ static int intel_pinctrl_add_padgroups(struct intel_pinctrl *pctrl,
break;
}
+ gpps[i].padown_num = padown_num;
+ padown_num += DIV_ROUND_UP(gpps[i].size * 4, 32);
+ }
+
+ community->gpps = gpps;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int intel_pinctrl_add_padgroups_by_size(struct intel_pinctrl *pctrl,
+ struct intel_community *community)
+{
+ struct intel_padgroup *gpps;
+ unsigned int npins = community->npins;
+ unsigned int padown_num = 0;
+ size_t i, ngpps = DIV_ROUND_UP(npins, community->gpp_size);
+
+ if (community->gpp_size > 32)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ gpps = devm_kcalloc(pctrl->dev, ngpps, sizeof(*gpps), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!gpps)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < ngpps; i++) {
+ unsigned int gpp_size = community->gpp_size;
+
+ gpps[i].reg_num = i;
+ gpps[i].base = community->pin_base + i * gpp_size;
+ gpps[i].size = min(gpp_size, npins);
+ npins -= gpps[i].size;
+
gpps[i].padown_num = padown_num;
/*
@@ -1483,7 +1500,10 @@ static int intel_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
community->regs = regs;
community->pad_regs = regs + padbar;
- ret = intel_pinctrl_add_padgroups(pctrl, community);
+ if (community->gpps)
+ ret = intel_pinctrl_add_padgroups_by_gpps(pctrl, community);
+ else
+ ret = intel_pinctrl_add_padgroups_by_size(pctrl, community);
if (ret)
return ret;
}
--
2.29.2
next reply other threads:[~2021-01-08 13:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-08 13:40 Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2021-01-08 13:40 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] pinctrl: intel: Drop unnecessary check for predefined features Andy Shevchenko
2021-01-08 13:40 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] pinctrl: intel: Convert capability list to features Andy Shevchenko
2021-01-08 13:46 ` Mika Westerberg
2021-01-08 14:04 ` Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210108134005.30048-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).