From: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
To: Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: acpi: support override broken GPIO number in ACPI table
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2021 17:43:01 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210303094300.GB17424@dragon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <abbfcdfa-c287-3828-ed6f-bc1e1f13c6b2@codeaurora.org>
On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 10:02:49PM -0700, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
> Sorry, just joining the thread now. Hopefully I'm addressing everything
> targeted at me.
>
> I used to do kernel work on MSMs, then kernel work on server CPUs, but now I
> do kernel work on AI accelerators. Never was on the firmware team, but I
> have a lot of contacts in those areas. On my own time, I support Linux on
> the Qualcomm laptops.
>
> Its not MS that needs to fix things (although there is plenty of things I
> could point to that MS could fix), its the Qualcomm Windows FW folks. They
> have told me a while ago they were planning on fixing this issue on some
> future chipset, but apparently that hasn't happened yet. Sadly, once these
> laptops ship, they are in a frozen maintenance mode.
>
> In my opinion, MS has allowed Qualcomm to get away with doing bad things in
> ACPI on the Qualcomm laptops. The ACPI is not a true hardware description
> that is OS agnostic as it should be, and probably violates the spec in many
> ways. Instead, the ACPI is written against the Windows drivers, and has a
> lot of OS driver crap pushed into it.
>
> The GPIO description is one such thing.
>
> As I understand it, any particular SoC will have a number of GPIOs supported
> by the TLMM. 0 - N. Linux understands this. However, in the ACPI of the
> Qualcomm Windows laptops, you will likely find atleast one GPIO number which
> exceeds this N. These are "virtual" GPIOs, and are a construct of the
> Windows Qualcomm TLMM driver and how it interfaces with the frameworks
> within Windows.
>
> Some GPIO lines can be configured as wakeup sources by routing them to a
> specific hardware block in the SoC (which block it is varies from SoC to
> SoC). Windows has a specific weird way of handling this which requires a
> unique "GPIO chip" to handle. GPIO chips in Windows contain 32 GPIOs, so
> for each wakeup GPIO, the TLMM driver creates a GPIO chip (essentially
> creating 32 GPIOs), and assigns the added GPIOs numbers which exceed N. The
> TLMM driver has an internal mapping of which virtual GPIO number corresponds
> to which real GPIO.
>
> So, ACPI says that some peripheral has GPIO N+X, which is not a real GPIO.
> That peripheral goes and requests that GPIO, which gets routed to the TLMM
> driver, and the TLMM driver translates that number to the real GPIO, and
> provides the reference back to the peripheral, while also setting up the
> special wakeup hardware.
>
> So, N+1 is the first supported wakup GPIO, N+1+32 is the next one, then
> N+1+32+32, and so on.
Jeffrey,
Thanks so much for these great information!
May I ask a bit more about how the virtual number N+1+32*n maps back to
the real number (R)? For example of touchpad GPIO on Flex 5G, I think
we have:
N+1+32*n = 0x0280
N = 191
R = 24
If my math not bad, n = 14. How does 14 map to 24?
Shawn
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-03 12:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-26 3:39 [PATCH] gpiolib: acpi: support override broken GPIO number in ACPI table Shawn Guo
2021-02-26 9:12 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-02-26 9:39 ` Shawn Guo
2021-02-26 10:57 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-02-26 11:19 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-02-27 3:19 ` Shawn Guo
2021-03-01 12:17 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-03-02 0:27 ` Shawn Guo
2021-03-02 12:21 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-03-03 5:02 ` Jeffrey Hugo
2021-03-03 8:06 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-03-03 8:45 ` Shawn Guo
2021-03-03 9:42 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-03-03 17:08 ` Jeffrey Hugo
2021-03-03 9:43 ` Shawn Guo [this message]
2021-03-03 15:10 ` Jeffrey Hugo
2021-03-03 15:57 ` Bjorn Andersson
2021-03-03 17:32 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-03-04 6:37 ` Shawn Guo
2021-03-04 6:59 ` Shawn Guo
2021-02-27 3:46 ` Shawn Guo
2021-03-01 12:19 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-03-02 0:44 ` Shawn Guo
2021-03-02 10:36 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-03-03 9:47 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-03-04 19:32 ` Hans de Goede
2021-03-04 20:16 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-03-05 1:14 ` Shawn Guo
2021-03-05 9:10 ` Hans de Goede
2021-03-05 10:08 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-03-05 10:10 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-03-05 11:26 ` Shawn Guo
2021-03-05 12:12 ` Hans de Goede
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210303094300.GB17424@dragon \
--to=shawn.guo@linaro.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=jhugo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).