From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 957FEC433ED for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 08:05:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 664A160FD9 for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 08:05:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230284AbhDAIE5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Apr 2021 04:04:57 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:47648 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233445AbhDAIEl (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Apr 2021 04:04:41 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-x335.google.com (mail-wm1-x335.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::335]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE41EC061788 for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 01:04:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm1-x335.google.com with SMTP id n11-20020a05600c4f8bb029010e5cf86347so3429282wmq.1 for ; Thu, 01 Apr 2021 01:04:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=QM7rCia0E0f24qsTX0VNJrlQHlXgwo18P09kK6//nHk=; b=yhSocdsAAbgIsDtLEU0fY/HIso3rH7inzjIXLFT2uUqVzWbWlqxWe4DTcnH5D5bIVc pbOX6dPSSUEH0L3M80PSVZ2QeODWtGPyWeG/XcxOG3pti3etGR6X7WK4/bHgQKZnZAqo r83ckH4EUrq7Sz2TFI/+tHy/5ZmpTKrqS5mwYwlDzhjRr0Y9+1nEUgTkHj6aeFPWGB3H Ki0ciNfnUmMeOcHicDFUuILl2Y4l+hIeh448kEqVE2yxnoTL6XlA2sFvmt1LgNXw4IdY nrOQXR2DSdT6OXeV47OHU3h5Wa9hKX6zzPfpGJJqqQyRAXeX+IH0zjwNUHL6zgXq8J/q Yagg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to; bh=QM7rCia0E0f24qsTX0VNJrlQHlXgwo18P09kK6//nHk=; b=cQKRHohD6+682f5TXWkl1AcLUWQHh+0kqaju9Jf0bEcWixQmiileu4ib9ec2k9+JOP nKvZGvEz+Tyr01AGKSh0Pz9rNIvo2PbZwmO2Lm+eqPCJP+q41yd0D/fN1hlRYV1AaX0C YlvRDTappPzdBBfwmddtj6ezkzLx/BxpKA4mBRxQGh3pvXPDRLyJXbPk3iyYngNpKDR7 KBBFxEIFY6gsoGib0VyhJg9s812kQ8uYSrxc5cq3ZajCvupw5Za2iuyZoF55+Ua9JwK5 tdA6Ety4q/I2DC9DiSB8aKCvzjYkLcIqXoiUgtzQI9VY94fSOyFS32kx4yrZ0TybIWND YHeg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530ortDA0GY/7oG+BCLiAJRTeUuqt2trtGTbVTWjjONIKPnCT17Z d6lTw9MncFisLRbQjpqti8+GKg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx6dwsz9577eN4J57oOfqxH2Zwh01VL6NnAsjhSyoT7F4fPApt2JbXPDy0SkMUZQSINwXOEgw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:203:: with SMTP id 3mr6755143wmi.88.1617264279366; Thu, 01 Apr 2021 01:04:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dell ([91.110.221.182]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r14sm8741396wrw.91.2021.04.01.01.04.38 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 01 Apr 2021 01:04:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2021 09:04:37 +0100 From: Lee Jones To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Matthias Schiffer , Linus Walleij , Bartosz Golaszewski , "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mfd: tqmx86: add support for TQMxE40M Message-ID: <20210401080437.GM2916463@dell> References: <3c19d714645f788913956223097adc360ceb6203.1617189926.git.matthias.schiffer@ew.tq-group.com> <83d7ea27b27225727fec7b077efe1a67ba1184a9.camel@ew.tq-group.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 31 Mar 2021, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 4:33 PM Matthias Schiffer > wrote: > > On Wed, 2021-03-31 at 15:37 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 2:38 PM Matthias Schiffer > > > wrote: > > ... > > > > > + return 24000; > > > > > > AFAICS it will return 24 MHz for "Unknown" board. Is it okay to be so brave? > > > > As noted in the commit message, our hardware developers intend to use > > 24 MHz for all future x86 SoMs. > > What may go wrong in the future?.. (rhetorical question, obviously) My preference would be to be explicit. Rather than support boards implicitly i.e. by accident. -- Lee Jones [李琼斯] Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog