From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54C12C433ED for ; Mon, 17 May 2021 22:13:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31E5B6105A for ; Mon, 17 May 2021 22:13:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238349AbhEQWPM (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 May 2021 18:15:12 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60960 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234563AbhEQWPL (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 May 2021 18:15:11 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-x1035.google.com (mail-pj1-x1035.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1035]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBD92C061573 for ; Mon, 17 May 2021 15:13:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pj1-x1035.google.com with SMTP id b9-20020a17090a9909b029015cf9effaeaso385455pjp.5 for ; Mon, 17 May 2021 15:13:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=beagleboard-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=9nkes+7je4/CgFuKfX3S6PTZeGuUNJXutzMU6gtvMZM=; b=tkpR4KeT1MErkkeRPj9smQOPw8XIv98ro9W2tLtfn9TNiodgFH758pS+ocwxMCYq8T x207PAYePtAkpyRf+/IvdgNqRvDLnDfeY8dt34Sp03lK1mpjGs57M6TbkFF6Ic+I3nNa pAW4SqUJUiCM8rUv1U7ZMlfymn7qkrGX5gP1A7Ca92ls5jZy+7PWeYydPVmpTTUxj6/X WDJlW8pD5s0s+AAUYhoYmgmJ8wwtk/l5reqCWBRG46JBv1hvBjRoR6YRxfmb3jEIvKOV Kk3xXE8bUE4am2+fr3tozs/JIJE/zeBxB8dwEt8Sl3fhZDT6TQQWhwyCiGYi/867VCum z8Vw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=9nkes+7je4/CgFuKfX3S6PTZeGuUNJXutzMU6gtvMZM=; b=T5/cdk62KOGAJda17x3rtuUVMCZiXH+CLhb91qi9W2MRDtupCl8o9AbHobwSbKUgbt ydHiBirskHa/3m5V2aSN7y6pPrOlAjLLlKT/du1UlPl7tE5jRw9rVgNeVDs3TW7tSSdD sQhOAYPlBDD1mH2KBYTmBycA9ZOSFn4mwyk+23JdH6DVgRtmWMmn0YuoAmhDF+z9TBP1 sJ2EdBjdHUmmYM+sRLY/UQmdnXqDwx5GXmh3N7JjKC/UUTHWvmuyWWsdby2cPhkb08ht 6r3UA/Bx2YfYe7Oyngiv7gUK5exiCiVmErfOkBjv91Gtrop2hPN1TfhamrzbS4aoNHCp 7IaQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5321UEe1qalcLowlmyhAijREFlHbvukct/DshrbdiHRYwkzV9V4t AQqGdYu2A/a1kzFMrgmoaeXLcw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxZw4sBD+Ll1ihn9gQ+NIvgpZUiUsnDv8m2RDbSOGtyLKnf3rXvXy8qO22+d6wxwlN1+obOCQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:7144:b029:f0:d8e7:95a3 with SMTP id u4-20020a1709027144b02900f0d8e795a3mr716705plm.52.1621289626023; Mon, 17 May 2021 15:13:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from x1 ([2601:1c0:4701:ae70:aa60:5ddf:388a:f8f7]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g202sm3814538pfb.54.2021.05.17.15.13.44 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 17 May 2021 15:13:45 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 17 May 2021 15:13:43 -0700 From: Drew Fustini To: Mauri Sandberg Cc: andy.shevchenko@gmail.com, bgolaszewski@baylibre.com, geert+renesas@glider.be, linus.walleij@linaro.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] gpio: add generic gpio input multiplexer Message-ID: <20210517221343.GA2936462@x1> References: <20210325122832.119147-1-sandberg@mailfence.com> <20210517165847.206316-1-sandberg@mailfence.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210517165847.206316-1-sandberg@mailfence.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 07:58:45PM +0300, Mauri Sandberg wrote: > Hello all! > > This patch set is closely related to another thread at [4], which I abandoned > against better judgement and created this one. > > Here I am sending revised versions of the patches. It builds on v2 and adopts > managed device resources as suggested by Andy on the thread mentioned > above [5]. > > I have tested the functionality on a NXP 74HC153 dual 4-way muxer. Drew, did > you find the time to have a go with this [6] and if so, did it work as expected? I ordered the parts but did not get around to trying it. I will try it out tomorrow with this patch series. Thanks, Drew