From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Kent Gibson <warthog618@gmail.com>,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/1] gpiolib: Introduce for_each_gpio_desc_if() macro
Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 11:33:39 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210518083339.23416-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In a few places we are using a loop against all GPIO descriptors
with a given flag for a given device. Replace it with a consolidated
for_each type of macro.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
---
v2: fixed compilation issue (LKP), injected if (test_bit) into the loop
drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c | 10 ++++------
drivers/gpio/gpiolib-sysfs.c | 7 ++-----
drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 7 +++----
drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h | 7 +++++++
4 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c
index bbcc7c073f63..2f8f3f0c8373 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c
@@ -711,14 +711,12 @@ static int of_gpiochip_scan_gpios(struct gpio_chip *chip)
static void of_gpiochip_remove_hog(struct gpio_chip *chip,
struct device_node *hog)
{
- struct gpio_desc *descs = chip->gpiodev->descs;
+ struct gpio_desc *desc;
unsigned int i;
- for (i = 0; i < chip->ngpio; i++) {
- if (test_bit(FLAG_IS_HOGGED, &descs[i].flags) &&
- descs[i].hog == hog)
- gpiochip_free_own_desc(&descs[i]);
- }
+ for_each_gpio_desc_if(i, chip, desc, FLAG_IS_HOGGED)
+ if (desc->hog == hog)
+ gpiochip_free_own_desc(desc);
}
static int of_gpiochip_match_node(struct gpio_chip *chip, void *data)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-sysfs.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-sysfs.c
index ae49bb23c6ed..41b3b782bf3f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-sysfs.c
@@ -801,11 +801,8 @@ void gpiochip_sysfs_unregister(struct gpio_device *gdev)
mutex_unlock(&sysfs_lock);
/* unregister gpiod class devices owned by sysfs */
- for (i = 0; i < chip->ngpio; i++) {
- desc = &gdev->descs[i];
- if (test_and_clear_bit(FLAG_SYSFS, &desc->flags))
- gpiod_free(desc);
- }
+ for_each_gpio_desc_if(i, chip, desc, FLAG_SYSFS)
+ gpiod_free(desc);
}
static int __init gpiolib_sysfs_init(void)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
index 220a9d8dd4e3..97a69362a584 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
@@ -4012,12 +4012,11 @@ int gpiod_hog(struct gpio_desc *desc, const char *name,
*/
static void gpiochip_free_hogs(struct gpio_chip *gc)
{
+ struct gpio_desc *desc;
int id;
- for (id = 0; id < gc->ngpio; id++) {
- if (test_bit(FLAG_IS_HOGGED, &gc->gpiodev->descs[id].flags))
- gpiochip_free_own_desc(&gc->gpiodev->descs[id]);
- }
+ for_each_gpio_desc_if(id, gc, desc, FLAG_IS_HOGGED)
+ gpiochip_free_own_desc(desc);
}
/**
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h
index 30bc3f80f83e..69c96a4276de 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h
@@ -82,6 +82,13 @@ struct gpio_array {
};
struct gpio_desc *gpiochip_get_desc(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int hwnum);
+
+#define for_each_gpio_desc_if(i, gc, desc, flag) \
+ for (i = 0, desc = gpiochip_get_desc(gc, i); \
+ i < gc->ngpio; \
+ i++, desc = gpiochip_get_desc(gc, i)) \
+ if (!test_bit(flag, &desc->flags)) {} else
+
int gpiod_get_array_value_complex(bool raw, bool can_sleep,
unsigned int array_size,
struct gpio_desc **desc_array,
--
2.30.2
next reply other threads:[~2021-05-18 8:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-18 8:33 Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2021-05-18 23:41 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] gpiolib: Introduce for_each_gpio_desc_if() macro Linus Walleij
2021-05-20 8:07 ` Johan Hovold
2021-05-20 8:15 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-05-20 8:33 ` Johan Hovold
2021-05-20 9:03 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-05-20 9:07 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-05-20 9:16 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-05-20 9:41 ` Johan Hovold
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210518083339.23416-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=warthog618@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).