From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4057C47083 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 10:43:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9510613B4 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 10:43:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231909AbhFBKo4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jun 2021 06:44:56 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43780 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231646AbhFBKo4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jun 2021 06:44:56 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-x434.google.com (mail-pf1-x434.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::434]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC407C061574 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 03:43:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf1-x434.google.com with SMTP id g18so1868423pfr.2 for ; Wed, 02 Jun 2021 03:43:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=WNy36R/oTjrtrMVEv7lR50FBdSjvXpQOmcbzPCW3S64=; b=u/elTlJ90NJwNAJUIWHjoVI2tZ8xx6ffnTLHTOMrcaE8EC+3+nQQz6Z1eeOmmPZBU0 h/pA7GsbuOyyC/jA4nGMSxLeKJYYAzfZOS3gYUIf+h3BqSOTCwS82C2/1uTHVa3S4Mvl u/kRgiBNx/fqrPQJw9ez7xOsrSGMByWpvQHpgVDlyWDQqDnu546bI30DFJozoJ6KQvL9 DYs3pIp8KeLFyf1wkCREqh+E33mJ1IxYPnf6nUocR5LohLVAv62k6sP9H7i0nUBDlLSw MlRDtB7UUZ5EDjUx18LtK4msZdOD4MwTTzX6PfM2cG679WKOI2bEezf5ZqjXP6s7UrjC OC6Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=WNy36R/oTjrtrMVEv7lR50FBdSjvXpQOmcbzPCW3S64=; b=hSy7JKaRys0TioSWb1XjmYvtJjjwTsWFpAljjVxQM0AWhGbf4QwZOxtMJXOBnoF1l0 gT6F58TY4HHBwbgEdX73yRvkr1pU046YLJ4E6PMHUuqF+YW7HtQL0vMMY9covfZCGgNW urMpcXgxuG3ilt9EFtf8HKdlxlJSHAIWCKMr2mZjb2kxj0Gia1YTdPA49kRNJn6Xwswo LIjruJBPD5Z6IRAVGEzBZ3xi8VkQb+xrQAdAgul7WIaPD2gtoEVrgvPf7KETB6PL4Cdb SctkvGwBetOgoyRx7V4Dyulo9UnEvAN5dNXm4pUfjw0BCdVaEUMPelF5KknRfTIqeLdL BUmw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531uiMne/cwg0NIcXcEbQwv0ltFl63xOp93M4FECzm8sfZ9LZTE8 9Nv7JK9X4qrm4sRZmrz3p3U= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwi3XsYuFMbBac73gnPZk9wvdDKPd3W9fAJttFe9xV2BoH2w/BleIVQUqpqAi+yI3bQLHgTqw== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:9af6:0:b029:2e9:dfed:6a59 with SMTP id y22-20020aa79af60000b02902e9dfed6a59mr12507664pfp.37.1622630591239; Wed, 02 Jun 2021 03:43:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sol (106-69-174-31.dyn.iinet.net.au. [106.69.174.31]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ig1sm494430pjb.27.2021.06.02.03.43.08 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 02 Jun 2021 03:43:10 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2021 18:43:05 +0800 From: Kent Gibson To: Bartosz Golaszewski Cc: Linus Walleij , Andy Shevchenko , "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" Subject: Re: [libgpiod][RFC v2] core: implement v2.0 API Message-ID: <20210602104305.GA202614@sol> References: <20210518191855.12647-1-brgl@bgdev.pl> <20210527112705.GA20965@sol> <20210528232320.GA5165@sol> <20210530004544.GA4498@sol> <20210602031257.GA6359@sol> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 10:36:52AM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 5:13 AM Kent Gibson wrote: > > > > [snip] > > > > > > > Ok got it. > > > > > > I think we're getting close to an agreement. :) > > > > > > > Well that makes one of us ;). > > > > Oh we don't? I thought there are only minor disagreements on naming > convention and error handling but for most part we're aligned on the > general shape of the API? > Indeed we are. My apologies for the failed humour. Cheers, Kent.