From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13252C07E95 for ; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 21:46:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2B9061351 for ; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 21:46:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235118AbhGMVts (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jul 2021 17:49:48 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59984 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234947AbhGMVts (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jul 2021 17:49:48 -0400 Received: from mail-ej1-x631.google.com (mail-ej1-x631.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::631]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F4E1C0613DD for ; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 14:46:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ej1-x631.google.com with SMTP id hr1so44192505ejc.1 for ; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 14:46:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=essensium.com; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=Ywm+gK026pGNqzZzWkXHXl/JmzlRHZrhjXMr5NX3cc0=; b=NmxD/HNs6vP9G6kBa5010BhawkLJ0E+t1PxwUo++bNEg3K+yK6M8c7qa8sh0qZe5km 1XKYbr7iHmmNSIRjgkN1zhOhFO+wBaqaCkGBVpLbxxEW0PpeTQ1XoJdE/glewttWdOlJ +odZ9msQgDrAn6CroCU9E4I3QDKNBXQr0wjapdJJRffpAdoeShrKVgJ08KqYTQzz/qyP kZSXKJf8ZHOB1Go0Dmfeodfkpg8WTRpF95YbN1P1x1onxKfCYkD9S3MXDVdIHN6ZYd9O JWUTC/E3OoMU+XghrMf+3AgkG2V3iaaTYK/hJpOA6rUG3b2j71uhxusTR7luFhXq2aKk pcvA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=Ywm+gK026pGNqzZzWkXHXl/JmzlRHZrhjXMr5NX3cc0=; b=bGfT+EA5lYYl86iiuxVQen1A306ctWj8ELqZFrFibo5g5ltZ8mf02X5AUYDz9wDfWC QPKfTMYys3YSshTov/ExkbOTqxpQvQGfAYXrldIGwAj7yeOo38nJZyeSNaZ2jrenV0aW cv+5TUpOJehPsysHft1gALgvYF83ZPGmzeYT8tDyKMLfHv7KKlsoxDCe9hbut43LIcOZ mGGecBemru/dNr9+bbVhvhb637HP4zadYmzdS/hwPn/ZQdI4uMuXSAcGBqF/HttWJF6k 913EK9tZP31DtA2Mrubtj4BIJXvD3hitHxl71b0WxdwPOLDpiqNdOnSw3t3iB8TSPCIf DwWQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530TRLZG751cDiX+Vo6e+MyAVUDpXGqjU/zwSky00c8Zr+iagY66 iPNIWPmy3ka1w3u4YwlRNILReOHbKTZvdQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzKdvUTgjjfyVGzJGMejotv6kft+3euqhURDDWSE3NlX1c/huX/a0G8NTNJ74Qrpqm3x9gBNQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:b794:: with SMTP id dt20mr8240824ejb.431.1626212814818; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 14:46:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cephalopod (168.7-181-91.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be. [91.181.7.168]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ee29sm104299edb.39.2021.07.13.14.46.54 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 13 Jul 2021 14:46:54 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2021 23:46:52 +0200 From: Ben Hutchings To: Bartosz Golaszewski Cc: "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" Subject: Re: [libgpiod] How stable is the v2 API? Message-ID: <20210713214651.GB8031@cephalopod> References: <20210712210836.GA3636@cephalopod> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 10:10:12PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: [...] > While - as you already assumed - there are no commitments to any API & > ABI stability yet, the interface should not change very much. I have a > single set of API changes in my queue that we discussed while > reviewing the C++ bindings and I don't expect there to be many more > coming after that. Is that single set of API changes the same as or do you have more beyond that? > Again: this is an estimation, not a promise. Understood. Thanks, Ben.