From: Colin Foster <colin.foster@in-advantage.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>,
Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@nxp.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@nxp.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Lars Povlsen <lars.povlsen@microchip.com>,
Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v4 net-next 16/23] pinctrl: microchip-sgpio: change device tree matches to use nodes instead of device
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2021 22:23:21 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211116062328.1949151-17-colin.foster@in-advantage.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211116062328.1949151-1-colin.foster@in-advantage.com>
microchip-sgpio is being updated to support being a device of a device. As
such, standard devicetree parsing functions (device_property_count_u32) are
being changed to a lower level functions like fwnode_property_count_u32.
Signed-off-by: Colin Foster <colin.foster@in-advantage.com>
---
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-microchip-sgpio.c | 72 +++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-microchip-sgpio.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-microchip-sgpio.c
index 762611f76438..10736ef5c6ca 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-microchip-sgpio.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-microchip-sgpio.c
@@ -109,6 +109,7 @@ struct sgpio_bank {
struct sgpio_priv {
struct device *dev;
+ struct device_node *dev_node;
struct sgpio_bank in;
struct sgpio_bank out;
u32 bitcount;
@@ -524,12 +525,16 @@ static int microchip_sgpio_of_xlate(struct gpio_chip *gc,
static int microchip_sgpio_get_ports(struct sgpio_priv *priv)
{
const char *range_property_name = "microchip,sgpio-port-ranges";
+ struct device_node *dev_node = priv->dev_node;
+ const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode_handle;
struct device *dev = priv->dev;
u32 range_params[64];
int i, nranges, ret;
+ fwnode_handle = of_fwnode_handle(dev_node);
+
/* Calculate port mask */
- nranges = device_property_count_u32(dev, range_property_name);
+ nranges = fwnode_property_count_u32(fwnode_handle, range_property_name);
if (nranges < 2 || nranges % 2 || nranges > ARRAY_SIZE(range_params)) {
dev_err(dev, "%s port range: '%s' property\n",
nranges == -EINVAL ? "Missing" : "Invalid",
@@ -537,7 +542,7 @@ static int microchip_sgpio_get_ports(struct sgpio_priv *priv)
return -EINVAL;
}
- ret = device_property_read_u32_array(dev, range_property_name,
+ ret = fwnode_property_read_u32_array(fwnode_handle, range_property_name,
range_params, nranges);
if (ret) {
dev_err(dev, "failed to parse '%s' property: %d\n",
@@ -804,11 +809,38 @@ static int microchip_sgpio_register_bank(struct device *dev,
return ret;
}
+static const struct of_device_id microchip_sgpio_gpio_of_match[] = {
+ {
+ .compatible = "microchip,sparx5-sgpio",
+ .data = &properties_sparx5,
+ }, {
+ .compatible = "mscc,luton-sgpio",
+ .data = &properties_luton,
+ }, {
+ .compatible = "mscc,ocelot-sgpio",
+ .data = &properties_ocelot,
+ }, {
+ /* sentinel */
+ }
+};
+
+static struct sgpio_properties
+*microchip_sgpio_match_from_node(struct device_node *node)
+{
+ const struct of_device_id *match;
+
+ match = of_match_node(of_match_ptr(microchip_sgpio_gpio_of_match), node);
+ if (match)
+ return (struct sgpio_properties *)match->data;
+ return NULL;
+}
+
static int microchip_sgpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
int div_clock = 0, ret, port, i, nbanks;
struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
- struct fwnode_handle *fwnode;
+ struct device_node *node = dev_of_node(dev);
+ struct fwnode_handle *child, *fwnode;
struct reset_control *reset;
struct sgpio_priv *priv;
struct clk *clk;
@@ -825,18 +857,21 @@ static int microchip_sgpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return -ENOMEM;
priv->dev = dev;
+ priv->dev_node = node;
+
+ fwnode = of_fwnode_handle(node);
- reset = devm_reset_control_get_optional_shared(&pdev->dev, "switch");
+ reset = devm_reset_control_get_optional_shared(dev, "switch");
if (IS_ERR(reset))
return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(reset), "Failed to get reset\n");
reset_control_reset(reset);
- clk = devm_clk_get(dev, NULL);
+ clk = devm_get_clk_from_child(dev, node, NULL);
if (IS_ERR(clk))
return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(clk), "Failed to get clock\n");
div_clock = clk_get_rate(clk);
- if (device_property_read_u32(dev, "bus-frequency", &priv->clock))
+ if (fwnode_property_read_u32(fwnode, "bus-frequency", &priv->clock))
priv->clock = 12500000;
if (priv->clock == 0 || priv->clock > (div_clock / 2)) {
dev_err(dev, "Invalid frequency %d\n", priv->clock);
@@ -852,7 +887,7 @@ static int microchip_sgpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return PTR_ERR(priv->regs);
priv->regs_offset = 0;
- priv->properties = device_get_match_data(dev);
+ priv->properties = microchip_sgpio_match_from_node(node);
priv->in.is_input = true;
/* Get rest of device properties */
@@ -860,17 +895,17 @@ static int microchip_sgpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (ret)
return ret;
- nbanks = device_get_child_node_count(dev);
+ nbanks = fwnode_get_child_node_count(fwnode);
if (nbanks != 2) {
dev_err(dev, "Must have 2 banks (have %d)\n", nbanks);
return -EINVAL;
}
i = 0;
- device_for_each_child_node(dev, fwnode) {
- ret = microchip_sgpio_register_bank(dev, priv, fwnode, i++);
+ fwnode_for_each_child_node(fwnode, child) {
+ ret = microchip_sgpio_register_bank(dev, priv, child, i++);
if (ret) {
- fwnode_handle_put(fwnode);
+ fwnode_handle_put(child);
return ret;
}
}
@@ -892,21 +927,6 @@ static int microchip_sgpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return 0;
}
-static const struct of_device_id microchip_sgpio_gpio_of_match[] = {
- {
- .compatible = "microchip,sparx5-sgpio",
- .data = &properties_sparx5,
- }, {
- .compatible = "mscc,luton-sgpio",
- .data = &properties_luton,
- }, {
- .compatible = "mscc,ocelot-sgpio",
- .data = &properties_ocelot,
- }, {
- /* sentinel */
- }
-};
-
static struct platform_driver microchip_sgpio_pinctrl_driver = {
.driver = {
.name = "pinctrl-microchip-sgpio",
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-16 6:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-16 6:23 [RFC PATCH v4 net-next 00/23] add support for VSC75XX control over SPI Colin Foster
2021-11-16 6:23 ` [RFC PATCH v4 net-next 01/23] net: dsa: ocelot: remove unnecessary pci_bar variables Colin Foster
2021-11-16 17:37 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-11-16 6:23 ` [RFC PATCH v4 net-next 02/23] net: mdio: mscc-miim: convert to a regmap implementation Colin Foster
2021-11-16 6:23 ` [RFC PATCH v4 net-next 03/23] net: dsa: ocelot: seville: utilize of_mdiobus_register Colin Foster
2021-11-16 11:21 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-11-16 23:51 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-11-16 6:23 ` [RFC PATCH v4 net-next 04/23] net: dsa: ocelot: felix: switch to mdio-mscc-miim driver for indirect mdio access Colin Foster
2021-11-16 6:23 ` [RFC PATCH v4 net-next 05/23] net: dsa: ocelot: felix: Remove requirement for PCS in felix devices Colin Foster
2021-11-16 6:23 ` [RFC PATCH v4 net-next 06/23] net: dsa: ocelot: felix: add interface for custom regmaps Colin Foster
2021-11-16 6:23 ` [RFC PATCH v4 net-next 07/23] net: dsa: ocelot: felix: add per-device-per-port quirks Colin Foster
2021-11-16 6:23 ` [RFC PATCH v4 net-next 08/23] net: mscc: ocelot: split register definitions to a separate file Colin Foster
2021-11-16 6:23 ` [RFC PATCH v4 net-next 09/23] net: mscc: ocelot: expose ocelot wm functions Colin Foster
2021-11-16 6:23 ` [RFC PATCH v4 net-next 10/23] pinctrl: ocelot: combine get resource and ioremap into single call Colin Foster
2021-11-16 6:23 ` [RFC PATCH v4 net-next 11/23] pinctrl: ocelot: update pinctrl to automatic base address Colin Foster
2021-11-16 17:36 ` Alexandre Belloni
2021-11-17 13:47 ` Clément Léger
2021-11-19 2:16 ` Colin Foster
2021-11-16 6:23 ` [RFC PATCH v4 net-next 12/23] pinctrl: ocelot: convert pinctrl to regmap Colin Foster
2021-11-16 6:23 ` [RFC PATCH v4 net-next 13/23] pinctrl: ocelot: expose ocelot_pinctrl_core_probe interface Colin Foster
2021-11-16 6:23 ` [RFC PATCH v4 net-next 14/23] pinctrl: microchip-sgpio: update to support regmap Colin Foster
2021-11-16 6:23 ` [RFC PATCH v4 net-next 15/23] device property: add helper function fwnode_get_child_node_count Colin Foster
2021-11-16 8:23 ` Heikki Krogerus
2021-11-16 6:23 ` Colin Foster [this message]
2021-11-16 6:23 ` [RFC PATCH v4 net-next 17/23] pinctrl: microchip-sgpio: expose microchip_sgpio_core_probe interface Colin Foster
2021-11-16 6:23 ` [RFC PATCH v4 net-next 18/23] net: phy: lynx: refactor Lynx PCS module to use generic phylink_pcs Colin Foster
2021-11-16 6:23 ` [RFC PATCH v4 net-next 19/23] net: dsa: felix: name change for clarity from pcs to mdio_device Colin Foster
2021-11-16 6:23 ` [RFC PATCH v4 net-next 20/23] net: dsa: seville: " Colin Foster
2021-11-16 6:23 ` [RFC PATCH v4 net-next 21/23] net: ethernet: enetc: " Colin Foster
2021-11-16 6:23 ` [RFC PATCH v4 net-next 22/23] net: pcs: lynx: use a common naming scheme for all lynx_pcs variables Colin Foster
2021-11-16 6:23 ` [RFC PATCH v4 net-next 23/23] net: dsa: ocelot: felix: add support for VSC75XX control over SPI Colin Foster
2021-11-16 10:34 ` [RFC PATCH v4 net-next 00/23] " Andy Shevchenko
2021-11-16 15:04 ` Colin Foster
2021-11-16 17:05 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-11-16 11:10 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-11-16 15:32 ` Colin Foster
2021-11-16 17:41 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-11-16 22:56 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-11-16 23:44 ` Colin Foster
2021-11-16 23:47 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-11-19 1:58 ` Linus Walleij
2021-11-19 2:14 ` Colin Foster
2021-11-21 23:59 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211116062328.1949151-17-colin.foster@in-advantage.com \
--to=colin.foster@in-advantage.com \
--cc=Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com \
--cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=claudiu.manoil@nxp.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=ioana.ciornei@nxp.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=lars.povlsen@microchip.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=vivien.didelot@gmail.com \
--cc=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).