From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com, linus.walleij@linaro.org,
brgl@bgdev.pl, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 11/59] gpiolib: acpi: Do not set the IRQ type if the IRQ is already in use
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2022 21:46:12 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220118024701.1952911-11-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220118024701.1952911-1-sashal@kernel.org>
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
[ Upstream commit bdfd6ab8fdccd8b138837efff66f4a1911496378 ]
If the IRQ is already in use, then acpi_dev_gpio_irq_get_by() really
should not change the type underneath the current owner.
I specifically hit an issue with this an a Chuwi Hi8 Super (CWI509) Bay
Trail tablet, when the Boot OS selection in the BIOS is set to Android.
In this case _STA for a MAX17047 ACPI I2C device wrongly returns 0xf and
the _CRS resources for this device include a GpioInt pointing to a GPIO
already in use by an _AEI handler, with a different type then specified
in the _CRS for the MAX17047 device. Leading to the acpi_dev_gpio_irq_get()
call done by the i2c-core-acpi.c code changing the type breaking the
_AEI handler.
Now this clearly is a bug in the DSDT of this tablet (in Android mode),
but in general calling irq_set_irq_type() on an IRQ which already is
in use seems like a bad idea.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c | 15 +++++++++++----
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c
index b018909a4e46c..47cdc1f89e3fb 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c
@@ -904,10 +904,17 @@ int acpi_dev_gpio_irq_get(struct acpi_device *adev, int index)
irq_flags = acpi_dev_get_irq_type(info.triggering,
info.polarity);
- /* Set type if specified and different than the current one */
- if (irq_flags != IRQ_TYPE_NONE &&
- irq_flags != irq_get_trigger_type(irq))
- irq_set_irq_type(irq, irq_flags);
+ /*
+ * If the IRQ is not already in use then set type
+ * if specified and different than the current one.
+ */
+ if (can_request_irq(irq, irq_flags)) {
+ if (irq_flags != IRQ_TYPE_NONE &&
+ irq_flags != irq_get_trigger_type(irq))
+ irq_set_irq_type(irq, irq_flags);
+ } else {
+ dev_dbg(&adev->dev, "IRQ %d already in use\n", irq);
+ }
return irq;
}
--
2.34.1
parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-18 3:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
[parent not found: <20220118024701.1952911-1-sashal@kernel.org>]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220118024701.1952911-11-sashal@kernel.org \
--to=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).