Re: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: ocelot: Fix pincfg for lan966x

[Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>]

The 07/08/2022 10:27, Michael Walle wrote:

Hi Walle,

> 
> > -static struct pinctrl_desc luton_desc = {
> > -     .name = "luton-pinctrl",
> > -     .pins = luton_pins,
> > -     .npins = ARRAY_SIZE(luton_pins),
> > -     .pctlops = &ocelot_pctl_ops,
> > -     .pmxops = &ocelot_pmx_ops,
> > -     .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> > +static struct ocelot_match_data luton_desc = {
> > +     {
> .desc = {
> 
> Same for all the structs. 

Yes, I will do that.


> Also it looks like it is way too big
> for a stable backport:
>  "It cannot be bigger than 100 lines, with context."

Don't you think it is a little bit silly to apply that rule to this
patch. In the way that 70% of the patch is just indentation.

> 
> > +             .name = "luton-pinctrl",
> > +             .pins = luton_pins,
> > +             .npins = ARRAY_SIZE(luton_pins),
> > +             .pctlops = &ocelot_pctl_ops,
> > +             .pmxops = &ocelot_pmx_ops,
> > +             .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> > +     }
> >  };
> 
> -michael

-- 
/Horatiu