linux-gpio.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, kbuild-all@lists.01.org,
	Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@linaro.org>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
	Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] gpio: mxc: Protect GPIO irqchip RMW with bgpio spinlock
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2022 02:32:27 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202207250224.XFYIB7dF-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220724171057.18549-1-marex@denx.de>

Hi Marek,

I love your patch! Yet something to improve:

[auto build test ERROR on brgl/gpio/for-next]
[also build test ERROR on linus/master v5.19-rc7 next-20220722]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Marek-Vasut/gpio-mxc-Protect-GPIO-irqchip-RMW-with-bgpio-spinlock/20220725-011230
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/brgl/linux.git gpio/for-next
config: hexagon-randconfig-r041-20220724 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220725/202207250224.XFYIB7dF-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 15.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 12fbd2d377e396ad61bce56d71c98a1eb1bebfa9)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
        wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/af6c815e16849c7ec370f755916d06a6b1e5b759
        git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
        git fetch --no-tags linux-review Marek-Vasut/gpio-mxc-Protect-GPIO-irqchip-RMW-with-bgpio-spinlock/20220725-011230
        git checkout af6c815e16849c7ec370f755916d06a6b1e5b759
        # save the config file
        mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
        COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=hexagon SHELL=/bin/bash drivers/gpio/

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

>> drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c:189:20: error: incompatible pointer types passing 'raw_spinlock_t *' (aka 'struct raw_spinlock *') to parameter of type 'spinlock_t *' (aka 'struct spinlock *') [-Werror,-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
           spin_lock_irqsave(&port->gc.bgpio_lock, flags);
                             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   include/linux/spinlock.h:379:39: note: expanded from macro 'spin_lock_irqsave'
           raw_spin_lock_irqsave(spinlock_check(lock), flags);     \
                                                ^~~~
   include/linux/spinlock.h:264:26: note: expanded from macro 'raw_spin_lock_irqsave'
                   _raw_spin_lock_irqsave(lock, flags);    \
                                          ^~~~
   include/linux/spinlock_api_up.h:69:60: note: expanded from macro '_raw_spin_lock_irqsave'
   #define _raw_spin_lock_irqsave(lock, flags)     __LOCK_IRQSAVE(lock, flags)
                                                                  ^~~~
   include/linux/spinlock_api_up.h:40:38: note: expanded from macro '__LOCK_IRQSAVE'
     do { local_irq_save(flags); __LOCK(lock); } while (0)
                                        ^~~~
   include/linux/spinlock_api_up.h:31:35: note: expanded from macro '__LOCK'
     do { preempt_disable(); ___LOCK(lock); } while (0)
                                     ^~~~
   include/linux/spinlock_api_up.h:28:32: note: expanded from macro '___LOCK'
     do { __acquire(lock); (void)(lock); } while (0)
                                  ^~~~
   include/linux/spinlock.h:322:67: note: passing argument to parameter 'lock' here
   static __always_inline raw_spinlock_t *spinlock_check(spinlock_t *lock)
                                                                     ^
   drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c:210:25: error: incompatible pointer types passing 'raw_spinlock_t *' (aka 'struct raw_spinlock *') to parameter of type 'spinlock_t *' (aka 'struct spinlock *') [-Werror,-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
           spin_unlock_irqrestore(&port->gc.bgpio_lock, flags);
                                  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   include/linux/spinlock.h:402:64: note: passing argument to parameter 'lock' here
   static __always_inline void spin_unlock_irqrestore(spinlock_t *lock, unsigned long flags)
                                                                  ^
   drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c:222:20: error: incompatible pointer types passing 'raw_spinlock_t *' (aka 'struct raw_spinlock *') to parameter of type 'spinlock_t *' (aka 'struct spinlock *') [-Werror,-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
           spin_lock_irqsave(&port->gc.bgpio_lock, flags);
                             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   include/linux/spinlock.h:379:39: note: expanded from macro 'spin_lock_irqsave'
           raw_spin_lock_irqsave(spinlock_check(lock), flags);     \
                                                ^~~~
   include/linux/spinlock.h:264:26: note: expanded from macro 'raw_spin_lock_irqsave'
                   _raw_spin_lock_irqsave(lock, flags);    \
                                          ^~~~
   include/linux/spinlock_api_up.h:69:60: note: expanded from macro '_raw_spin_lock_irqsave'
   #define _raw_spin_lock_irqsave(lock, flags)     __LOCK_IRQSAVE(lock, flags)
                                                                  ^~~~
   include/linux/spinlock_api_up.h:40:38: note: expanded from macro '__LOCK_IRQSAVE'
     do { local_irq_save(flags); __LOCK(lock); } while (0)
                                        ^~~~
   include/linux/spinlock_api_up.h:31:35: note: expanded from macro '__LOCK'
     do { preempt_disable(); ___LOCK(lock); } while (0)
                                     ^~~~
   include/linux/spinlock_api_up.h:28:32: note: expanded from macro '___LOCK'
     do { __acquire(lock); (void)(lock); } while (0)
                                  ^~~~
   include/linux/spinlock.h:322:67: note: passing argument to parameter 'lock' here
   static __always_inline raw_spinlock_t *spinlock_check(spinlock_t *lock)
                                                                     ^
   drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c:242:25: error: incompatible pointer types passing 'raw_spinlock_t *' (aka 'struct raw_spinlock *') to parameter of type 'spinlock_t *' (aka 'struct spinlock *') [-Werror,-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
           spin_unlock_irqrestore(&port->gc.bgpio_lock, flags);
                                  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   include/linux/spinlock.h:402:64: note: passing argument to parameter 'lock' here
   static __always_inline void spin_unlock_irqrestore(spinlock_t *lock, unsigned long flags)
                                                                  ^
   4 errors generated.


vim +189 drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c

   145	
   146	static int gpio_set_irq_type(struct irq_data *d, u32 type)
   147	{
   148		struct irq_chip_generic *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
   149		struct mxc_gpio_port *port = gc->private;
   150		unsigned long flags;
   151		u32 bit, val;
   152		u32 gpio_idx = d->hwirq;
   153		int edge;
   154		void __iomem *reg = port->base;
   155	
   156		port->both_edges &= ~(1 << gpio_idx);
   157		switch (type) {
   158		case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING:
   159			edge = GPIO_INT_RISE_EDGE;
   160			break;
   161		case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING:
   162			edge = GPIO_INT_FALL_EDGE;
   163			break;
   164		case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH:
   165			if (GPIO_EDGE_SEL >= 0) {
   166				edge = GPIO_INT_BOTH_EDGES;
   167			} else {
   168				val = port->gc.get(&port->gc, gpio_idx);
   169				if (val) {
   170					edge = GPIO_INT_LOW_LEV;
   171					pr_debug("mxc: set GPIO %d to low trigger\n", gpio_idx);
   172				} else {
   173					edge = GPIO_INT_HIGH_LEV;
   174					pr_debug("mxc: set GPIO %d to high trigger\n", gpio_idx);
   175				}
   176				port->both_edges |= 1 << gpio_idx;
   177			}
   178			break;
   179		case IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW:
   180			edge = GPIO_INT_LOW_LEV;
   181			break;
   182		case IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH:
   183			edge = GPIO_INT_HIGH_LEV;
   184			break;
   185		default:
   186			return -EINVAL;
   187		}
   188	
 > 189		spin_lock_irqsave(&port->gc.bgpio_lock, flags);
   190	
   191		if (GPIO_EDGE_SEL >= 0) {
   192			val = readl(port->base + GPIO_EDGE_SEL);
   193			if (edge == GPIO_INT_BOTH_EDGES)
   194				writel(val | (1 << gpio_idx),
   195					port->base + GPIO_EDGE_SEL);
   196			else
   197				writel(val & ~(1 << gpio_idx),
   198					port->base + GPIO_EDGE_SEL);
   199		}
   200	
   201		if (edge != GPIO_INT_BOTH_EDGES) {
   202			reg += GPIO_ICR1 + ((gpio_idx & 0x10) >> 2); /* lower or upper register */
   203			bit = gpio_idx & 0xf;
   204			val = readl(reg) & ~(0x3 << (bit << 1));
   205			writel(val | (edge << (bit << 1)), reg);
   206		}
   207	
   208		writel(1 << gpio_idx, port->base + GPIO_ISR);
   209	
   210		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&port->gc.bgpio_lock, flags);
   211	
   212		return 0;
   213	}
   214	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://01.org/lkp

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-07-24 18:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-24 17:10 [PATCH v3 1/2] gpio: mxc: Protect GPIO irqchip RMW with bgpio spinlock Marek Vasut
2022-07-24 17:10 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] gpio: mxc: Always set GPIOs used as interrupt source to INPUT mode Marek Vasut
2022-07-25 20:36   ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-07-25 21:26     ` Marek Vasut
2022-07-26  8:22     ` Linus Walleij
2022-07-24 17:50 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] gpio: mxc: Protect GPIO irqchip RMW with bgpio spinlock Marc Zyngier
2022-07-24 18:15   ` Marek Vasut
2022-07-25  6:53     ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-25  9:57       ` Marek Vasut
2022-07-25 10:06         ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-24 18:32 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2022-07-24 18:42 ` kernel test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202207250224.XFYIB7dF-lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
    --cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=loic.poulain@linaro.org \
    --cc=marex@denx.de \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=peng.fan@nxp.com \
    --cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).