From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81BA1C001DF for ; Fri, 21 Jul 2023 15:40:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231725AbjGUPkZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Jul 2023 11:40:25 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42332 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230509AbjGUPkY (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Jul 2023 11:40:24 -0400 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66D211BF7; Fri, 21 Jul 2023 08:40:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B870761CAD; Fri, 21 Jul 2023 15:40:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A232CC433CA; Fri, 21 Jul 2023 15:40:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1689954021; bh=L/8ROPKn5FRlN87/a9hvfNMvi9wPkopmqeGrLx/LYvE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=RbGHQxLzzcyM3GtLL7UE2QCJDHJhtvK+SwyVPMZgvQy5dGI1sdaVucZWNShHf0F8I nm1ijlgOQkn2DVDlBEcowN0pKLflTtZAVH7TGmBfb0nuTt5JyiWmsGwgbC+iDQw4vJ E79Y4YTLqARhR0XIZe+q66KZdBmIHFn3vqJpSRkc= Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2023 17:40:18 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Hugo Villeneuve Cc: Andy Shevchenko , robh+dt@kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, jirislaby@kernel.org, jringle@gridpoint.com, tomasz.mon@camlingroup.com, l.perczak@camlintechnologies.com, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, Hugo Villeneuve , stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 5/9] serial: sc16is7xx: fix regression with GPIO configuration Message-ID: <2023072152-traffic-skype-8765@gregkh> References: <20230620113312.882d8f0c7d5603b1c93f33fb@hugovil.com> <20230620114209.fb5272ad8cf5c5e2895d68b1@hugovil.com> <20230620121645.512b31a872306b43a276bbac@hugovil.com> <20230719144048.4f340b8aa0a29ab65a274273@hugovil.com> <2023071922-rigor-collage-804e@gregkh> <2023072040-clock-waltz-a5f2@gregkh> <20230721112517.38ab9a40cdf6a0eddf074615@hugovil.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20230721112517.38ab9a40cdf6a0eddf074615@hugovil.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 11:25:17AM -0400, Hugo Villeneuve wrote: > On Thu, 20 Jul 2023 21:38:21 +0200 > Greg KH wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 09:14:23PM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 02:40:48PM -0400, Hugo Villeneuve wrote: > > > > On Tue, 20 Jun 2023 12:16:45 -0400 > > > > Hugo Villeneuve wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 20 Jun 2023 18:45:51 +0300 > > > > > Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 6:42 PM Hugo Villeneuve wrote: > > > > > > > On Tue, 20 Jun 2023 18:35:48 +0300 > > > > > > > Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 6:33 PM Hugo Villeneuve wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 20 Jun 2023 18:18:12 +0300 > > > > > > > > > Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 5:08 PM Hugo Villeneuve wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, 4 Jun 2023 22:31:04 +0300 > > > > > > > > > > > Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > did you have a chance to look at V8 (sent two weks ago) which fixed all > > > > > > > > > > > of what we discussed? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The patch 6 already has my tag, anything specific you want me to do? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Andy, > > > > > > > > > I forgot to remove your "Reviewed-by: Andy..." tag before sending V8 > > > > > > > > > since there were some changes involved in patch 6 and I wanted you to > > > > > > > > > review them. Can you confirm if the changes are correct? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I also added a new patch "remove obsolete out_thread label". It has no > > > > > > > > > real impact on the code generation itself, but maybe you can review and > > > > > > > > > confirm if tags are ok or not, based on commit message and also > > > > > > > > > additional commit message. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Both are fine to me. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > Ok, thank you for reviewing this. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I guess now we are good to go with this series if the stable tags and > > > > > > > patches order are good after Greg's review? > > > > > > > > > > > > Taking into account that we are at rc7, and even with Fixes tags in > > > > > > your series I think Greg might take this after v6.5-0rc1 is out. It's > > > > > > up to him how to proceed with that. Note, he usually has thousands of > > > > > > patches in backlog, you might need to respin it after the above > > > > > > mentioned rc1. > > > > > > > > > > Ok, understood. > > > > > > > > > > Let's wait then. > > > > > > > > Hi Andy/Greg, > > > > we are now at v6.5-rc2 and I still do not see any of our patches in > > > > linus or gregkh_tty repos. > > > > > > > > Is there something missing from my part (or someone else) to go forward > > > > with integrating these patches (v8) for v6.5? > > > > > > My queue is huge right now, please be patient, I want to have them all > > > handled by the end of next week... > > > > > > You can always help out by reviewing other patches on the mailing list > > > to reduce my review load. > > > > Wait, no, this series was superseeded by v8, and in there you said you > > were going to send a new series. So please, fix it up and send the > > updated version of the series, this one isn't going to be applied for > > obvious reasons. > > Hi Greg, > I never said that I would resend another update for this current > serie (unless of course if it was to address a new comment). Re-reading > that email made me realise that it was maybe not perfectly clear the > way I wrote it. > > What I said was that, once V8 was finally applied and > incorporated in the kernel, then I would send a completely new and > different serie to address issues/concerns/improvements/suggestions > noted during the review of this serie (example: conversion of bindings > to YAML and improve DTS node names, etc). We already agreed with some > maintainers (ex: Conor Dooley) that it was reasonnable to do so. > > That is why I asked Andy if we were good to go with V8 and he > confirmed that, and that it was now up to you to integrate it if your > review was satisfactory. > > Hope this clears things and we can integrate it soon. I don't have any of your series in my review queue at all, so please resend them. thanks, greg k-h