From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6609FEEB585 for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2023 10:07:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230449AbjIIKHM (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Sep 2023 06:07:12 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49932 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229529AbjIIKHM (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Sep 2023 06:07:12 -0400 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.55.52.136]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4E099D; Sat, 9 Sep 2023 03:07:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1694254027; x=1725790027; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=E5kgblMB7JiKmXG1Rz+9maFmsoais6/+oJ9GGpqltdg=; b=H/zNgIzAU40KtyB5CmKaUyFvMAm/hQtwXfTVyXGuLgLEGjXsnzFJvLPe 7Kj7BzxMXGhuI9H9ed80KbQ/Um5w7/3smAyb3t41egZOMe//wtu0wHeEU fxPm+M28Q2trpU3GyJENrdtOrRqvhT56WLTmhys5c3ElufpHEhxG9EXqc wLJ9XK9Ys++FlWsGjUaprXGtvbhcxTCQXLJgli9LLWcxy2siLQkcV35G+ f3xRAMHObaTjk+26+hUtmTqZGLuCWq67/zVnjJ+c7vZxaERXEHrduHN8o uGX+Vccjud8MO9PV/Wb7rKZY0DkNMSx+s/TJO7Yeiu/lpD/lrkKWnlr/4 g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10827"; a="357275530" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.02,239,1688454000"; d="scan'208";a="357275530" Received: from fmsmga007.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.52]) by fmsmga106.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Sep 2023 03:07:07 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10827"; a="745868179" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.02,239,1688454000"; d="scan'208";a="745868179" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 59b3c6e06877) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmsmga007.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 09 Sep 2023 03:07:05 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 59b3c6e06877 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1qeurn-0003He-0V; Sat, 09 Sep 2023 10:07:03 +0000 Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2023 18:06:18 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Jernej Skrabec , linus.walleij@linaro.org Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jernej Skrabec Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: pinmux: Use dev_err_probe() in pin_request() Message-ID: <202309091724.tJzAxzS5-lkp@intel.com> References: <20230909063613.2867-3-jernej.skrabec@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230909063613.2867-3-jernej.skrabec@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org Hi Jernej, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on linusw-pinctrl/devel] [also build test ERROR on linusw-pinctrl/for-next linus/master v6.5 next-20230908] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Jernej-Skrabec/pinctrl-pinmux-Remove-duplicate-error-message-in-pin_request/20230909-143817 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-pinctrl.git devel patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230909063613.2867-3-jernej.skrabec%40gmail.com patch subject: [PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: pinmux: Use dev_err_probe() in pin_request() config: hexagon-randconfig-002-20230909 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230909/202309091724.tJzAxzS5-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 17.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git 4a5ac14ee968ff0ad5d2cc1ffa0299048db4c88a) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230909/202309091724.tJzAxzS5-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202309091724.tJzAxzS5-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): >> drivers/pinctrl/pinmux.c:191:31: error: incompatible pointer to integer conversion passing 'char[23]' to parameter of type 'int' [-Wint-conversion] 191 | dev_err_probe(pctldev->dev, "pin-%d (%s) status %d\n", | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/device.h:1218:64: note: passing argument to parameter 'err' here 1218 | __printf(3, 4) int dev_err_probe(const struct device *dev, int err, const char *fmt, ...); | ^ >> drivers/pinctrl/pinmux.c:192:10: error: incompatible integer to pointer conversion passing 'int' to parameter of type 'const char *' [-Wint-conversion] 192 | pin, owner, status); | ^~~ include/linux/device.h:1218:81: note: passing argument to parameter 'fmt' here 1218 | __printf(3, 4) int dev_err_probe(const struct device *dev, int err, const char *fmt, ...); | ^ 2 errors generated. vim +191 drivers/pinctrl/pinmux.c 101 102 /** 103 * pin_request() - request a single pin to be muxed in, typically for GPIO 104 * @pctldev: the associated pin controller device 105 * @pin: the pin number in the global pin space 106 * @owner: a representation of the owner of this pin; typically the device 107 * name that controls its mux function, or the requested GPIO name 108 * @gpio_range: the range matching the GPIO pin if this is a request for a 109 * single GPIO pin 110 */ 111 static int pin_request(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, 112 int pin, const char *owner, 113 struct pinctrl_gpio_range *gpio_range) 114 { 115 struct pin_desc *desc; 116 const struct pinmux_ops *ops = pctldev->desc->pmxops; 117 int status = -EINVAL; 118 119 desc = pin_desc_get(pctldev, pin); 120 if (desc == NULL) { 121 dev_err(pctldev->dev, 122 "pin %d is not registered so it cannot be requested\n", 123 pin); 124 goto out; 125 } 126 127 dev_dbg(pctldev->dev, "request pin %d (%s) for %s\n", 128 pin, desc->name, owner); 129 130 if ((!gpio_range || ops->strict) && 131 desc->mux_usecount && strcmp(desc->mux_owner, owner)) { 132 dev_err(pctldev->dev, 133 "pin %s already requested by %s; cannot claim for %s\n", 134 desc->name, desc->mux_owner, owner); 135 goto out; 136 } 137 138 if ((gpio_range || ops->strict) && desc->gpio_owner) { 139 dev_err(pctldev->dev, 140 "pin %s already requested by %s; cannot claim for %s\n", 141 desc->name, desc->gpio_owner, owner); 142 goto out; 143 } 144 145 if (gpio_range) { 146 desc->gpio_owner = owner; 147 } else { 148 desc->mux_usecount++; 149 if (desc->mux_usecount > 1) 150 return 0; 151 152 desc->mux_owner = owner; 153 } 154 155 /* Let each pin increase references to this module */ 156 if (!try_module_get(pctldev->owner)) { 157 dev_err(pctldev->dev, 158 "could not increase module refcount for pin %d\n", 159 pin); 160 status = -EINVAL; 161 goto out_free_pin; 162 } 163 164 /* 165 * If there is no kind of request function for the pin we just assume 166 * we got it by default and proceed. 167 */ 168 if (gpio_range && ops->gpio_request_enable) 169 /* This requests and enables a single GPIO pin */ 170 status = ops->gpio_request_enable(pctldev, gpio_range, pin); 171 else if (ops->request) 172 status = ops->request(pctldev, pin); 173 else 174 status = 0; 175 176 if (status) 177 module_put(pctldev->owner); 178 179 out_free_pin: 180 if (status) { 181 if (gpio_range) { 182 desc->gpio_owner = NULL; 183 } else { 184 desc->mux_usecount--; 185 if (!desc->mux_usecount) 186 desc->mux_owner = NULL; 187 } 188 } 189 out: 190 if (status) > 191 dev_err_probe(pctldev->dev, "pin-%d (%s) status %d\n", > 192 pin, owner, status); 193 194 return status; 195 } 196 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki