[PATCH v3 00/11] gpiolib: work towards removing gpiochip_find()

[PATCH v3 00/11] gpiolib: work towards removing gpiochip_find()

[Bartosz Golaszewski]

From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>

This is a reduced subset of patches from the initial sumbission[1]
limited only to changes inside GPIOLIB. Once this is upstream, we can
then slowly merge patches for other subsystems (like HTE) and then
eventually remove gpiochip_find() entirely.

The GPIO subsystem does not handle hot-unplug events very well. We have
recently patched the user-space part of it so that at least a rouge user
cannot crash the kernel but in-kernel users are still affected by a lot of
issues: from incorrect locking or lack thereof to using structures that are
private to GPIO drivers. Since almost all GPIO controllers can be unbound,
not to mention that we have USB devices registering GPIO expanders as well as
I2C-on-USB HID devices on which I2C GPIO expanders can live, various media
gadgets etc., we really need to make GPIO hotplug/unplug friendly.

Before we can even get to fixing the locking, we need to address a serious
abuse of the GPIO driver API - accessing struct gpio_chip by anyone who isn't
the driver owning this object. This structure is owned by the GPIO provider
and its lifetime is tied to that of that provider. It is destroyed when the
device is unregistered and this may happen at any moment. struct gpio_device
is the opaque, reference counted interface to struct gpio_chip (which is the
low-level implementation) and all access should pass through it.

The end-goal is to make all gpio_device manipulators check the existence of
gdev->chip and then lock it for the duration of any of the calls using SRCU.
Before we can get there, we need to first provide a set of functions that will
replace any gpio_chip functions and convert all in-kernel users.

This series adds several new helpers to the public GPIO API and uses
them across the core GPIO code.

Note that this does not make everything correct just yet. Especially the
GPIOLIB internal users release the reference returned by the lookup function
after getting the descriptor of interest but before requesting it. This will
eventually be addressed. This is not a regression either.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230905185309.131295-1-brgl@bgdev.pl/T/

v2 -> v3:
- use gpio_device_get_chip() consistently
- clarify comments
- fix buggy chip assignment
- check for PTR_ERR() in automatic cleanup
- rearrange code as requested by Andy

v1 -> v2:
- drop all non-GPIOLIB patches
- collect tags
- fix kernel docs
- use gpio_device_get_chip() and gpio_device_get_desc() where applicable

Bartosz Golaszewski (11):
  gpiolib: make gpio_device_get() and gpio_device_put() public
  gpiolib: add support for scope-based management to gpio_device
  gpiolib: provide gpio_device_find()
  gpiolib: provide gpio_device_find_by_label()
  gpiolib: provide gpio_device_get_desc()
  gpiolib: reluctantly provide gpio_device_get_chip()
  gpiolib: replace find_chip_by_name() with gpio_device_find_by_label()
  gpio: of: replace gpiochip_find_* with gpio_device_find_*
  gpio: acpi: replace gpiochip_find() with gpio_device_find()
  gpio: swnode: replace gpiochip_find() with gpio_device_find_by_label()
  gpio: sysfs: drop the mention of gpiochip_find() from sysfs code

 drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c   |  12 +-
 drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c     |  33 +++---
 drivers/gpio/gpiolib-swnode.c |  33 +++---
 drivers/gpio/gpiolib-sysfs.c  |   2 +-
 drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c        | 202 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h        |  10 --
 include/linux/gpio/driver.h   |  16 +++
 7 files changed, 216 insertions(+), 92 deletions(-)

-- 
2.39.2

[PATCH v3 01/11] gpiolib: make gpio_device_get() and gpio_device_put() public

[Bartosz Golaszewski]

From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>

In order to start migrating away from accessing struct gpio_chip by
users other than their owners, let's first make the reference management
functions for the opaque struct gpio_device public in the driver.h
header.

Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c      | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h      | 10 ----------
 include/linux/gpio/driver.h |  3 +++
 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
index edffa0d2acaa..f84ad54d8dbd 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
@@ -1058,6 +1058,30 @@ static struct gpio_chip *find_chip_by_name(const char *name)
 	return gpiochip_find((void *)name, gpiochip_match_name);
 }
 
+/**
+ * gpio_device_get() - Increase the reference count of this GPIO device
+ * @gdev: GPIO device to increase the refcount for
+ *
+ * Returns:
+ * Pointer to @gdev.
+ */
+struct gpio_device *gpio_device_get(struct gpio_device *gdev)
+{
+	return to_gpio_device(get_device(&gdev->dev));
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpio_device_get);
+
+/**
+ * gpio_device_put() - Decrease the reference count of this GPIO device and
+ *                     possibly free all resources associated with it.
+ * @gdev: GPIO device to decrease the reference count for
+ */
+void gpio_device_put(struct gpio_device *gdev)
+{
+	put_device(&gdev->dev);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpio_device_put);
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_GPIOLIB_IRQCHIP
 
 /*
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h
index 9bff5c2cf720..3ccacf3c1288 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h
@@ -86,16 +86,6 @@ static inline struct gpio_device *to_gpio_device(struct device *dev)
 	return container_of(dev, struct gpio_device, dev);
 }
 
-static inline struct gpio_device *gpio_device_get(struct gpio_device *gdev)
-{
-	return to_gpio_device(get_device(&gdev->dev));
-}
-
-static inline void gpio_device_put(struct gpio_device *gdev)
-{
-	put_device(&gdev->dev);
-}
-
 /* gpio suffixes used for ACPI and device tree lookup */
 static __maybe_unused const char * const gpio_suffixes[] = { "gpios", "gpio" };
 
diff --git a/include/linux/gpio/driver.h b/include/linux/gpio/driver.h
index 8f0859ba7065..a2060dc3344b 100644
--- a/include/linux/gpio/driver.h
+++ b/include/linux/gpio/driver.h
@@ -606,6 +606,9 @@ int devm_gpiochip_add_data_with_key(struct device *dev, struct gpio_chip *gc,
 struct gpio_chip *gpiochip_find(void *data,
 				int (*match)(struct gpio_chip *gc, void *data));
 
+struct gpio_device *gpio_device_get(struct gpio_device *gdev);
+void gpio_device_put(struct gpio_device *gdev);
+
 bool gpiochip_line_is_irq(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset);
 int gpiochip_reqres_irq(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset);
 void gpiochip_relres_irq(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset);
-- 
2.39.2

[PATCH v3 02/11] gpiolib: add support for scope-based management to gpio_device

[Bartosz Golaszewski]

From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>

As the few users that need to get the reference to the GPIO device often
release it right after inspecting its properties, let's add support for
the automatic reference release to struct gpio_device.

Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
---
 include/linux/gpio/driver.h | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/linux/gpio/driver.h b/include/linux/gpio/driver.h
index a2060dc3344b..1cedbc3d3200 100644
--- a/include/linux/gpio/driver.h
+++ b/include/linux/gpio/driver.h
@@ -3,6 +3,8 @@
 #define __LINUX_GPIO_DRIVER_H
 
 #include <linux/bits.h>
+#include <linux/cleanup.h>
+#include <linux/err.h>
 #include <linux/irqchip/chained_irq.h>
 #include <linux/irqdomain.h>
 #include <linux/irqhandler.h>
@@ -609,6 +611,9 @@ struct gpio_chip *gpiochip_find(void *data,
 struct gpio_device *gpio_device_get(struct gpio_device *gdev);
 void gpio_device_put(struct gpio_device *gdev);
 
+DEFINE_FREE(gpio_device_put, struct gpio_device *,
+	    if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(_T)) gpio_device_put(_T));
+
 bool gpiochip_line_is_irq(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset);
 int gpiochip_reqres_irq(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset);
 void gpiochip_relres_irq(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset);
-- 
2.39.2

[PATCH v3 03/11] gpiolib: provide gpio_device_find()

[Bartosz Golaszewski]

From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>

gpiochip_find() is wrong and its kernel doc is misleading as the
function doesn't return a reference to the gpio_chip but just a raw
pointer. The chip itself is not guaranteed to stay alive, in fact it can
be deleted at any point. Also: other than GPIO drivers themselves,
nobody else has any business accessing gpio_chip structs.

Provide a new gpio_device_find() function that returns a real reference
to the opaque gpio_device structure that is guaranteed to stay alive for
as long as there are active users of it.

Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c      | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 include/linux/gpio/driver.h |  3 ++
 2 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
index f84ad54d8dbd..0371d23f0a46 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
@@ -1014,16 +1014,10 @@ void gpiochip_remove(struct gpio_chip *gc)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpiochip_remove);
 
-/**
- * gpiochip_find() - iterator for locating a specific gpio_chip
- * @data: data to pass to match function
- * @match: Callback function to check gpio_chip
+/*
+ * FIXME: This will be removed soon.
  *
- * Similar to bus_find_device.  It returns a reference to a gpio_chip as
- * determined by a user supplied @match callback.  The callback should return
- * 0 if the device doesn't match and non-zero if it does.  If the callback is
- * non-zero, this function will return to the caller and not iterate over any
- * more gpio_chips.
+ * This function is depracated, don't use.
  */
 struct gpio_chip *gpiochip_find(void *data,
 				int (*match)(struct gpio_chip *gc,
@@ -1031,21 +1025,62 @@ struct gpio_chip *gpiochip_find(void *data,
 {
 	struct gpio_device *gdev;
 	struct gpio_chip *gc = NULL;
-	unsigned long flags;
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&gpio_lock, flags);
-	list_for_each_entry(gdev, &gpio_devices, list)
-		if (gdev->chip && match(gdev->chip, data)) {
-			gc = gdev->chip;
-			break;
-		}
-
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gpio_lock, flags);
+	gdev = gpio_device_find(data, match);
+	if (gdev) {
+		gc = gdev->chip;
+		gpio_device_put(gdev);
+	}
 
 	return gc;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpiochip_find);
 
+/**
+ * gpio_device_find() - find a specific GPIO device
+ * @data: data to pass to match function
+ * @match: Callback function to check gpio_chip
+ *
+ * Returns:
+ * New reference to struct gpio_device.
+ *
+ * Similar to bus_find_device(). It returns a reference to a gpio_device as
+ * determined by a user supplied @match callback. The callback should return
+ * 0 if the device doesn't match and non-zero if it does. If the callback
+ * returns non-zero, this function will return to the caller and not iterate
+ * over any more gpio_devices.
+ *
+ * The callback takes the GPIO chip structure as argument. During the execution
+ * of the callback function the chip is protected from being freed. TODO: This
+ * actually has yet to be implemented.
+ *
+ * If the function returns non-NULL, the returned reference must be freed by
+ * the caller using gpio_device_put().
+ */
+struct gpio_device *gpio_device_find(void *data,
+				     int (*match)(struct gpio_chip *gc,
+						  void *data))
+{
+	struct gpio_device *gdev;
+
+	/*
+	 * Not yet but in the future the spinlock below will become a mutex.
+	 * Annotate this function before anyone tries to use it in interrupt
+	 * context like it happened with gpiochip_find().
+	 */
+	might_sleep();
+
+	guard(spinlock_irqsave)(&gpio_lock);
+
+	list_for_each_entry(gdev, &gpio_devices, list) {
+		if (gdev->chip && match(gdev->chip, data))
+			return gpio_device_get(gdev);
+	}
+
+	return NULL;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpio_device_find);
+
 static int gpiochip_match_name(struct gpio_chip *gc, void *data)
 {
 	const char *name = data;
diff --git a/include/linux/gpio/driver.h b/include/linux/gpio/driver.h
index 1cedbc3d3200..6ad1f1a8ef2e 100644
--- a/include/linux/gpio/driver.h
+++ b/include/linux/gpio/driver.h
@@ -608,6 +608,9 @@ int devm_gpiochip_add_data_with_key(struct device *dev, struct gpio_chip *gc,
 struct gpio_chip *gpiochip_find(void *data,
 				int (*match)(struct gpio_chip *gc, void *data));
 
+struct gpio_device *gpio_device_find(void *data,
+				int (*match)(struct gpio_chip *gc, void *data));
+
 struct gpio_device *gpio_device_get(struct gpio_device *gdev);
 void gpio_device_put(struct gpio_device *gdev);
 
-- 
2.39.2

[PATCH v3 04/11] gpiolib: provide gpio_device_find_by_label()

[Bartosz Golaszewski]

From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>

By far the most common way of looking up GPIO devices is using their
label. Provide a helpers for that to avoid every user implementing their
own matching function.

Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c      | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/gpio/driver.h |  1 +
 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
index 0371d23f0a46..9f20311e4c1a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
 #include <linux/seq_file.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 #include <linux/spinlock.h>
+#include <linux/string.h>
 
 #include <linux/gpio.h>
 #include <linux/gpio/driver.h>
@@ -1081,6 +1082,26 @@ struct gpio_device *gpio_device_find(void *data,
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpio_device_find);
 
+static int gpio_chip_match_by_label(struct gpio_chip *gc, void *label)
+{
+	return gc->label && !strcmp(gc->label, label);
+}
+
+/**
+ * gpio_device_find_by_label() - wrapper around gpio_device_find() finding the
+ *                               GPIO device by its backing chip's label
+ * @label: Label to lookup
+ *
+ * Returns:
+ * Reference to the GPIO device or NULL. Reference must be released with
+ * gpio_device_put().
+ */
+struct gpio_device *gpio_device_find_by_label(const char *label)
+{
+	return gpio_device_find((void *)label, gpio_chip_match_by_label);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpio_device_find_by_label);
+
 static int gpiochip_match_name(struct gpio_chip *gc, void *data)
 {
 	const char *name = data;
diff --git a/include/linux/gpio/driver.h b/include/linux/gpio/driver.h
index 6ad1f1a8ef2e..24996cba6465 100644
--- a/include/linux/gpio/driver.h
+++ b/include/linux/gpio/driver.h
@@ -610,6 +610,7 @@ struct gpio_chip *gpiochip_find(void *data,
 
 struct gpio_device *gpio_device_find(void *data,
 				int (*match)(struct gpio_chip *gc, void *data));
+struct gpio_device *gpio_device_find_by_label(const char *label);
 
 struct gpio_device *gpio_device_get(struct gpio_device *gdev);
 void gpio_device_put(struct gpio_device *gdev);
-- 
2.39.2

[PATCH v3 05/11] gpiolib: provide gpio_device_get_desc()

[Bartosz Golaszewski]

From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>

Getting the GPIO descriptor directly from the gpio_chip struct is
dangerous as we don't take the reference to the underlying GPIO device.
In order to start working towards removing gpiochip_get_desc(), let's
provide a safer variant that works with an existing reference to struct
gpio_device.

Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c      | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 include/linux/gpio/driver.h |  2 ++
 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
index 9f20311e4c1a..7d2574b3dbe5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
@@ -147,27 +147,49 @@ struct gpio_desc *gpio_to_desc(unsigned gpio)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpio_to_desc);
 
-/**
- * gpiochip_get_desc - get the GPIO descriptor corresponding to the given
- *                     hardware number for this chip
- * @gc: GPIO chip
- * @hwnum: hardware number of the GPIO for this chip
- *
- * Returns:
- * A pointer to the GPIO descriptor or ``ERR_PTR(-EINVAL)`` if no GPIO exists
- * in the given chip for the specified hardware number.
- */
+/* This function is deprecated and will be removed soon, don't use. */
 struct gpio_desc *gpiochip_get_desc(struct gpio_chip *gc,
 				    unsigned int hwnum)
 {
-	struct gpio_device *gdev = gc->gpiodev;
+	return gpio_device_get_desc(gc->gpiodev, hwnum);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpiochip_get_desc);
+
+/**
+ * gpio_device_get_desc() - get the GPIO descriptor corresponding to the given
+ *                          hardware number for this GPIO device
+ * @gdev: GPIO device to get the descriptor from
+ * @hwnum: hardware number of the GPIO for this chip
+ *
+ * Returns:
+ * A pointer to the GPIO descriptor or %EINVAL if no GPIO exists in the given
+ * chip for the specified hardware number or %ENODEV if the underlying chip
+ * already vanished.
+ *
+ * The reference count of struct gpio_device is *NOT* increased like when the
+ * GPIO is being requested for exclusive usage. It's up to the caller to make
+ * sure the GPIO device will stay alive together with the descriptor returned
+ * by this function.
+ */
+struct gpio_desc *
+gpio_device_get_desc(struct gpio_device *gdev, unsigned int hwnum)
+{
+	struct gpio_chip *gc;
+
+	/*
+	 * FIXME: This will be locked once we protect gdev->chip everywhere
+	 * with SRCU.
+	 */
+	gc = gdev->chip;
+	if (!gc)
+		return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
 
 	if (hwnum >= gdev->ngpio)
 		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
 
 	return &gdev->descs[hwnum];
 }
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpiochip_get_desc);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpio_device_get_desc);
 
 /**
  * desc_to_gpio - convert a GPIO descriptor to the integer namespace
diff --git a/include/linux/gpio/driver.h b/include/linux/gpio/driver.h
index 24996cba6465..3fdf3f14bb13 100644
--- a/include/linux/gpio/driver.h
+++ b/include/linux/gpio/driver.h
@@ -770,6 +770,8 @@ struct gpio_desc *gpiochip_request_own_desc(struct gpio_chip *gc,
 void gpiochip_free_own_desc(struct gpio_desc *desc);
 
 struct gpio_desc *gpiochip_get_desc(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int hwnum);
+struct gpio_desc *
+gpio_device_get_desc(struct gpio_device *gdev, unsigned int hwnum);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_GPIOLIB
 
-- 
2.39.2

[PATCH v3 06/11] gpiolib: reluctantly provide gpio_device_get_chip()

[Bartosz Golaszewski]

From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>

The process of converting all unauthorized users of struct gpio_chip to
using dedicated struct gpio_device function will be long so in the
meantime we must provide a way of retrieving the pointer to struct
gpio_chip from a GPIO device.

Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c      | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/gpio/driver.h |  2 ++
 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
index 7d2574b3dbe5..e26cbd10a246 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
@@ -220,6 +220,27 @@ struct gpio_chip *gpiod_to_chip(const struct gpio_desc *desc)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpiod_to_chip);
 
+/**
+ * gpio_device_get_chip() - Get the gpio_chip implementation of this GPIO device
+ * @gdev: GPIO device
+ *
+ * Returns:
+ * Address of the GPIO chip backing this device.
+ *
+ * Until we can get rid of all non-driver users of struct gpio_chip, we must
+ * provide a way of retrieving the pointer to it from struct gpio_device. This
+ * is *NOT* safe as the GPIO API is considered to be hot-unpluggable and the
+ * chip can dissapear at any moment (unlike reference-counted struct
+ * gpio_device).
+ *
+ * Use at your own risk.
+ */
+struct gpio_chip *gpio_device_get_chip(struct gpio_device *gdev)
+{
+	return gdev->chip;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpio_device_get_chip);
+
 /* dynamic allocation of GPIOs, e.g. on a hotplugged device */
 static int gpiochip_find_base(int ngpio)
 {
diff --git a/include/linux/gpio/driver.h b/include/linux/gpio/driver.h
index 3fdf3f14bb13..f8ad7f40100c 100644
--- a/include/linux/gpio/driver.h
+++ b/include/linux/gpio/driver.h
@@ -773,6 +773,8 @@ struct gpio_desc *gpiochip_get_desc(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int hwnum);
 struct gpio_desc *
 gpio_device_get_desc(struct gpio_device *gdev, unsigned int hwnum);
 
+struct gpio_chip *gpio_device_get_chip(struct gpio_device *gdev);
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_GPIOLIB
 
 /* lock/unlock as IRQ */
-- 
2.39.2

[PATCH v3 07/11] gpiolib: replace find_chip_by_name() with gpio_device_find_by_label()

[Bartosz Golaszewski]

From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>

Remove all remaining uses of find_chip_by_name() (and subsequently:
gpiochip_find()) from gpiolib.c and use the new
gpio_device_find_by_label() instead.

Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 33 ++++++++++++---------------------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
index e26cbd10a246..4c734bfe6d32 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
@@ -1145,18 +1145,6 @@ struct gpio_device *gpio_device_find_by_label(const char *label)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpio_device_find_by_label);
 
-static int gpiochip_match_name(struct gpio_chip *gc, void *data)
-{
-	const char *name = data;
-
-	return !strcmp(gc->label, name);
-}
-
-static struct gpio_chip *find_chip_by_name(const char *name)
-{
-	return gpiochip_find((void *)name, gpiochip_match_name);
-}
-
 /**
  * gpio_device_get() - Increase the reference count of this GPIO device
  * @gdev: GPIO device to increase the refcount for
@@ -3908,21 +3896,22 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpiod_remove_lookup_table);
  */
 void gpiod_add_hogs(struct gpiod_hog *hogs)
 {
-	struct gpio_chip *gc;
 	struct gpiod_hog *hog;
 
 	mutex_lock(&gpio_machine_hogs_mutex);
 
 	for (hog = &hogs[0]; hog->chip_label; hog++) {
+		struct gpio_device *gdev __free(gpio_device_put) = NULL;
+
 		list_add_tail(&hog->list, &gpio_machine_hogs);
 
 		/*
 		 * The chip may have been registered earlier, so check if it
 		 * exists and, if so, try to hog the line now.
 		 */
-		gc = find_chip_by_name(hog->chip_label);
-		if (gc)
-			gpiochip_machine_hog(gc, hog);
+		gdev = gpio_device_find_by_label(hog->chip_label);
+		if (gdev)
+			gpiochip_machine_hog(gpio_device_get_chip(gdev), hog);
 	}
 
 	mutex_unlock(&gpio_machine_hogs_mutex);
@@ -3977,13 +3966,14 @@ static struct gpio_desc *gpiod_find(struct device *dev, const char *con_id,
 	struct gpio_desc *desc = ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
 	struct gpiod_lookup_table *table;
 	struct gpiod_lookup *p;
+	struct gpio_chip *gc;
 
 	table = gpiod_find_lookup_table(dev);
 	if (!table)
 		return desc;
 
 	for (p = &table->table[0]; p->key; p++) {
-		struct gpio_chip *gc;
+		struct gpio_device *gdev __free(gpio_device_put) = NULL;
 
 		/* idx must always match exactly */
 		if (p->idx != idx)
@@ -4005,9 +3995,8 @@ static struct gpio_desc *gpiod_find(struct device *dev, const char *con_id,
 			return ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
 		}
 
-		gc = find_chip_by_name(p->key);
-
-		if (!gc) {
+		gdev = gpio_device_find_by_label(p->key);
+		if (!gdev) {
 			/*
 			 * As the lookup table indicates a chip with
 			 * p->key should exist, assume it may
@@ -4020,6 +4009,8 @@ static struct gpio_desc *gpiod_find(struct device *dev, const char *con_id,
 			return ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
 		}
 
+		gc = gpio_device_get_chip(gdev);
+
 		if (gc->ngpio <= p->chip_hwnum) {
 			dev_err(dev,
 				"requested GPIO %u (%u) is out of range [0..%u] for chip %s\n",
@@ -4028,7 +4019,7 @@ static struct gpio_desc *gpiod_find(struct device *dev, const char *con_id,
 			return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
 		}
 
-		desc = gpiochip_get_desc(gc, p->chip_hwnum);
+		desc = gpio_device_get_desc(gdev, p->chip_hwnum);
 		*flags = p->flags;
 
 		return desc;
-- 
2.39.2

[PATCH v3 08/11] gpio: of: replace gpiochip_find_* with gpio_device_find_*

[Bartosz Golaszewski]

From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>

We're porting all users of gpiochip_find() to using gpio_device_find().
Update the OF GPIO code.

Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c
index 5515f32cf19b..4987c86010c1 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c
@@ -127,10 +127,10 @@ static int of_gpiochip_match_node_and_xlate(struct gpio_chip *chip, void *data)
 				chip->of_xlate(chip, gpiospec, NULL) >= 0;
 }
 
-static struct gpio_chip *of_find_gpiochip_by_xlate(
-					struct of_phandle_args *gpiospec)
+static struct gpio_device *
+of_find_gpio_device_by_xlate(struct of_phandle_args *gpiospec)
 {
-	return gpiochip_find(gpiospec, of_gpiochip_match_node_and_xlate);
+	return gpio_device_find(gpiospec, of_gpiochip_match_node_and_xlate);
 }
 
 static struct gpio_desc *of_xlate_and_get_gpiod_flags(struct gpio_chip *chip,
@@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ static void of_gpio_flags_quirks(const struct device_node *np,
 static struct gpio_desc *of_get_named_gpiod_flags(const struct device_node *np,
 		     const char *propname, int index, enum of_gpio_flags *flags)
 {
+	struct gpio_device *gdev __free(gpio_device_put) = NULL;
 	struct of_phandle_args gpiospec;
-	struct gpio_chip *chip;
 	struct gpio_desc *desc;
 	int ret;
 
@@ -375,13 +375,14 @@ static struct gpio_desc *of_get_named_gpiod_flags(const struct device_node *np,
 		return ERR_PTR(ret);
 	}
 
-	chip = of_find_gpiochip_by_xlate(&gpiospec);
-	if (!chip) {
+	gdev = of_find_gpio_device_by_xlate(&gpiospec);
+	if (!gdev) {
 		desc = ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
 		goto out;
 	}
 
-	desc = of_xlate_and_get_gpiod_flags(chip, &gpiospec, flags);
+	desc = of_xlate_and_get_gpiod_flags(gpio_device_get_chip(gdev),
+					    &gpiospec, flags);
 	if (IS_ERR(desc))
 		goto out;
 
@@ -813,16 +814,16 @@ static int of_gpiochip_match_node(struct gpio_chip *chip, void *data)
 	return device_match_of_node(&chip->gpiodev->dev, data);
 }
 
-static struct gpio_chip *of_find_gpiochip_by_node(struct device_node *np)
+static struct gpio_device *of_find_gpio_device_by_node(struct device_node *np)
 {
-	return gpiochip_find(np, of_gpiochip_match_node);
+	return gpio_device_find(np, of_gpiochip_match_node);
 }
 
 static int of_gpio_notify(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long action,
 			  void *arg)
 {
+	struct gpio_device *gdev __free(gpio_device_put) = NULL;
 	struct of_reconfig_data *rd = arg;
-	struct gpio_chip *chip;
 	int ret;
 
 	/*
@@ -839,11 +840,11 @@ static int of_gpio_notify(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long action,
 		if (of_node_test_and_set_flag(rd->dn, OF_POPULATED))
 			return NOTIFY_DONE;
 
-		chip = of_find_gpiochip_by_node(rd->dn->parent);
-		if (chip == NULL)
+		gdev = of_find_gpio_device_by_node(rd->dn->parent);
+		if (!gdev)
 			return NOTIFY_DONE;	/* not for us */
 
-		ret = of_gpiochip_add_hog(chip, rd->dn);
+		ret = of_gpiochip_add_hog(gpio_device_get_chip(gdev), rd->dn);
 		if (ret < 0) {
 			pr_err("%s: failed to add hogs for %pOF\n", __func__,
 			       rd->dn);
@@ -856,11 +857,11 @@ static int of_gpio_notify(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long action,
 		if (!of_node_check_flag(rd->dn, OF_POPULATED))
 			return NOTIFY_DONE;	/* already depopulated */
 
-		chip = of_find_gpiochip_by_node(rd->dn->parent);
-		if (chip == NULL)
+		gdev = of_find_gpio_device_by_node(rd->dn->parent);
+		if (!gdev)
 			return NOTIFY_DONE;	/* not for us */
 
-		of_gpiochip_remove_hog(chip, rd->dn);
+		of_gpiochip_remove_hog(gpio_device_get_chip(gdev), rd->dn);
 		of_node_clear_flag(rd->dn, OF_POPULATED);
 		return NOTIFY_OK;
 	}
-- 
2.39.2

[PATCH v3 09/11] gpio: acpi: replace gpiochip_find() with gpio_device_find()

[Bartosz Golaszewski]

From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>

We're porting all users of gpiochip_find() to using gpio_device_find().
Update the ACPI GPIO code.

Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c | 12 ++++++++----
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c
index 17a86bdd9609..2378e1e7e8b9 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c
@@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ static int acpi_gpiochip_find(struct gpio_chip *gc, void *data)
  */
 static struct gpio_desc *acpi_get_gpiod(char *path, unsigned int pin)
 {
-	struct gpio_chip *chip;
+	struct gpio_device *gdev __free(gpio_device_put) = NULL;
 	acpi_handle handle;
 	acpi_status status;
 
@@ -151,11 +151,15 @@ static struct gpio_desc *acpi_get_gpiod(char *path, unsigned int pin)
 	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
 
-	chip = gpiochip_find(handle, acpi_gpiochip_find);
-	if (!chip)
+	gdev = gpio_device_find(handle, acpi_gpiochip_find);
+	if (!gdev)
 		return ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
 
-	return gpiochip_get_desc(chip, pin);
+	/*
+	 * FIXME: keep track of the reference to the GPIO device somehow
+	 * instead of putting it here.
+	 */
+	return gpio_device_get_desc(gdev, pin);
 }
 
 /**
-- 
2.39.2

[PATCH v3 10/11] gpio: swnode: replace gpiochip_find() with gpio_device_find_by_label()

[Bartosz Golaszewski]

From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>

We're porting all users of gpiochip_find() to using gpio_device_find().
Update the swnode GPIO code.

Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpiolib-swnode.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-swnode.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-swnode.c
index b5a6eaf3729b..33c4b1a6c3c1 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-swnode.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-swnode.c
@@ -31,31 +31,26 @@ static void swnode_format_propname(const char *con_id, char *propname,
 		strscpy(propname, "gpios", max_size);
 }
 
-static int swnode_gpiochip_match_name(struct gpio_chip *chip, void *data)
+static struct gpio_device *swnode_get_gpio_device(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
 {
-	return !strcmp(chip->label, data);
-}
+	const struct software_node *gdev_node;
+	struct gpio_device *gdev;
 
-static struct gpio_chip *swnode_get_chip(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
-{
-	const struct software_node *chip_node;
-	struct gpio_chip *chip;
-
-	chip_node = to_software_node(fwnode);
-	if (!chip_node || !chip_node->name)
+	gdev_node = to_software_node(fwnode);
+	if (!gdev_node || !gdev_node->name)
 		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
 
-	chip = gpiochip_find((void *)chip_node->name, swnode_gpiochip_match_name);
-	return chip ?: ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
+	gdev = gpio_device_find_by_label((void *)gdev_node->name);
+	return gdev ?: ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
 }
 
 struct gpio_desc *swnode_find_gpio(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
 				   const char *con_id, unsigned int idx,
 				   unsigned long *flags)
 {
+	struct gpio_device *gdev __free(gpio_device_put) = NULL;
 	const struct software_node *swnode;
 	struct fwnode_reference_args args;
-	struct gpio_chip *chip;
 	struct gpio_desc *desc;
 	char propname[32]; /* 32 is max size of property name */
 	int error;
@@ -77,12 +72,16 @@ struct gpio_desc *swnode_find_gpio(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
 		return ERR_PTR(error);
 	}
 
-	chip = swnode_get_chip(args.fwnode);
+	gdev = swnode_get_gpio_device(args.fwnode);
 	fwnode_handle_put(args.fwnode);
-	if (IS_ERR(chip))
-		return ERR_CAST(chip);
+	if (IS_ERR(gdev))
+		return ERR_CAST(gdev);
 
-	desc = gpiochip_get_desc(chip, args.args[0]);
+	/*
+	 * FIXME: The GPIO device reference is put at return but the descriptor
+	 * is passed on. Find a proper solution.
+	 */
+	desc = gpio_device_get_desc(gdev, args.args[0]);
 	*flags = args.args[1]; /* We expect native GPIO flags */
 
 	pr_debug("%s: parsed '%s' property of node '%pfwP[%d]' - status (%d)\n",
-- 
2.39.2

[PATCH v3 11/11] gpio: sysfs: drop the mention of gpiochip_find() from sysfs code

[Bartosz Golaszewski]

From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>

We have removed all callers of gpiochip_find() so don't mention it in
gpiolib-sysfs.c.

Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpiolib-sysfs.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-sysfs.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-sysfs.c
index 50503a4525eb..6f309a3b2d9a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-sysfs.c
@@ -814,7 +814,7 @@ static int __init gpiolib_sysfs_init(void)
 		 * gpiochip_sysfs_register() acquires a mutex. This is unsafe
 		 * and needs to be fixed.
 		 *
-		 * Also it would be nice to use gpiochip_find() here so we
+		 * Also it would be nice to use gpio_device_find() here so we
 		 * can keep gpio_chips local to gpiolib.c, but the yield of
 		 * gpio_lock prevents us from doing this.
 		 */
-- 
2.39.2

Re: [PATCH v3 09/11] gpio: acpi: replace gpiochip_find() with gpio_device_find()

[Mika Westerberg]

On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 05:03:24PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
> 
> We're porting all users of gpiochip_find() to using gpio_device_find().
> Update the ACPI GPIO code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

Re: [PATCH v3 04/11] gpiolib: provide gpio_device_find_by_label()

[Andy Shevchenko]

On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 05:03:19PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
> 
> By far the most common way of looking up GPIO devices is using their
> label. Provide a helpers for that to avoid every user implementing their
> own matching function.

...

> +static int gpio_chip_match_by_label(struct gpio_chip *gc, void *label)
> +{
> +	return gc->label && !strcmp(gc->label, label);
> +}

I am still wondering if we can oblige providers to have label to be non-empty.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

Re: [PATCH v3 07/11] gpiolib: replace find_chip_by_name() with gpio_device_find_by_label()

[Andy Shevchenko]

On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 05:03:22PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
> 
> Remove all remaining uses of find_chip_by_name() (and subsequently:
> gpiochip_find()) from gpiolib.c and use the new
> gpio_device_find_by_label() instead.

...

> -static int gpiochip_match_name(struct gpio_chip *gc, void *data)
> -{
> -	const char *name = data;
> -
> -	return !strcmp(gc->label, name);

And this we had no check for the label being NULL...

...

>  	for (p = &table->table[0]; p->key; p++) {
> +		struct gpio_device *gdev __free(gpio_device_put) = NULL;

> +		gdev = gpio_device_find_by_label(p->key);
> +		if (!gdev) {

I haven't got the fix for gpio-sim, shouldn't we have the same here, i.e.
definition being done together with the assignment when __free() is in use?

>  		}

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

Re: [PATCH v3 10/11] gpio: swnode: replace gpiochip_find() with gpio_device_find_by_label()

[Andy Shevchenko]

On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 05:03:25PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
> 
> We're porting all users of gpiochip_find() to using gpio_device_find().
> Update the swnode GPIO code.

...

> +	gdev = gpio_device_find_by_label((void *)gdev_node->name);

Why do you need casting here?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

Re: [PATCH v3 07/11] gpiolib: replace find_chip_by_name() with gpio_device_find_by_label()

[Bartosz Golaszewski]

On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 9:23 AM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 05:03:22PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
> >
> > Remove all remaining uses of find_chip_by_name() (and subsequently:
> > gpiochip_find()) from gpiolib.c and use the new
> > gpio_device_find_by_label() instead.
>
> ...
>
> > -static int gpiochip_match_name(struct gpio_chip *gc, void *data)
> > -{
> > -     const char *name = data;
> > -
> > -     return !strcmp(gc->label, name);
>
> And this we had no check for the label being NULL...
>

Yeah, it was wrong. But maybe all kernel users already do assign it in
which case we should be safe just adding a check in
gpiochip_add_data_with_key() that would return EINVAL if they don't.

> ...
>
> >       for (p = &table->table[0]; p->key; p++) {
> > +             struct gpio_device *gdev __free(gpio_device_put) = NULL;
>
> > +             gdev = gpio_device_find_by_label(p->key);
> > +             if (!gdev) {
>
> I haven't got the fix for gpio-sim, shouldn't we have the same here, i.e.
> definition being done together with the assignment when __free() is in use?
>

It should but I only got yelled at by Linus under the gpio-sim patch
after I sent this one.

Bart

> >               }
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
>
>

Re: [PATCH v3 10/11] gpio: swnode: replace gpiochip_find() with gpio_device_find_by_label()

[Bartosz Golaszewski]

On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 9:26 AM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 05:03:25PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
> >
> > We're porting all users of gpiochip_find() to using gpio_device_find().
> > Update the swnode GPIO code.
>
> ...
>
> > +     gdev = gpio_device_find_by_label((void *)gdev_node->name);
>
> Why do you need casting here?
>

Most likely not, I'll check later.

Bart

> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
>
>

Re: [PATCH v3 07/11] gpiolib: replace find_chip_by_name() with gpio_device_find_by_label()

[Linus Walleij]

On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 10:03 AM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 9:23 AM Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:

> > >       for (p = &table->table[0]; p->key; p++) {
> > > +             struct gpio_device *gdev __free(gpio_device_put) = NULL;
> >
> > > +             gdev = gpio_device_find_by_label(p->key);
> > > +             if (!gdev) {
> >
> > I haven't got the fix for gpio-sim, shouldn't we have the same here, i.e.
> > definition being done together with the assignment when __free() is in use?
>
> It should but I only got yelled at by Linus under the gpio-sim patch
> after I sent this one.

That happens, it's all new.
I guess ideally we should patch checkpatch to just moan about
this, I wonder how hard that could be (I've only patched it once in
my life...)

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Re: [PATCH v3 04/11] gpiolib: provide gpio_device_find_by_label()

[Bartosz Golaszewski]

On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 9:19 AM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 05:03:19PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
> >
> > By far the most common way of looking up GPIO devices is using their
> > label. Provide a helpers for that to avoid every user implementing their
> > own matching function.
>
> ...
>
> > +static int gpio_chip_match_by_label(struct gpio_chip *gc, void *label)
> > +{
> > +     return gc->label && !strcmp(gc->label, label);
> > +}
>
> I am still wondering if we can oblige providers to have label to be non-empty.
>

Of course we can. Just bail out of gpiochip_add_data_with_key() if it
is. But that's material for a different patch.

Bart

Re: [PATCH v3 04/11] gpiolib: provide gpio_device_find_by_label()

[Andy Shevchenko]

On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 01:22:36PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 9:19 AM Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 05:03:19PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
> > >
> > > By far the most common way of looking up GPIO devices is using their
> > > label. Provide a helpers for that to avoid every user implementing their
> > > own matching function.

...

> > > +static int gpio_chip_match_by_label(struct gpio_chip *gc, void *label)
> > > +{
> > > +     return gc->label && !strcmp(gc->label, label);
> > > +}
> >
> > I am still wondering if we can oblige providers to have label to be non-empty.
> 
> Of course we can. Just bail out of gpiochip_add_data_with_key() if it
> is. But that's material for a different patch.

Yes, but my point here is that
1) the current users are already following this requirement;
2) the enforcement can be done explicitly somewhere (in the register function).

Is the 1) incorrect assumption?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

Re: [PATCH v3 04/11] gpiolib: provide gpio_device_find_by_label()

[Bartosz Golaszewski]

On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 2:33 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 01:22:36PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 9:19 AM Andy Shevchenko
> > <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 05:03:19PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > > > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
> > > >
> > > > By far the most common way of looking up GPIO devices is using their
> > > > label. Provide a helpers for that to avoid every user implementing their
> > > > own matching function.
>
> ...
>
> > > > +static int gpio_chip_match_by_label(struct gpio_chip *gc, void *label)
> > > > +{
> > > > +     return gc->label && !strcmp(gc->label, label);
> > > > +}
> > >
> > > I am still wondering if we can oblige providers to have label to be non-empty.
> >
> > Of course we can. Just bail out of gpiochip_add_data_with_key() if it
> > is. But that's material for a different patch.
>
> Yes, but my point here is that
> 1) the current users are already following this requirement;
> 2) the enforcement can be done explicitly somewhere (in the register function).
>
> Is the 1) incorrect assumption?
>

I remember doing a quick glance over GPIO providers and it looks like
ALL of them set the label. But I may have missed something. I would
start with a warning.

Bart

Re: [PATCH v3 04/11] gpiolib: provide gpio_device_find_by_label()

[Andy Shevchenko]

On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 02:42:28PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 2:33 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 01:22:36PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 9:19 AM Andy Shevchenko
> > > <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 05:03:19PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > > > > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>

...

> > > > > +static int gpio_chip_match_by_label(struct gpio_chip *gc, void *label)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > +     return gc->label && !strcmp(gc->label, label);
> > > > > +}
> > > >
> > > > I am still wondering if we can oblige providers to have label to be non-empty.
> > >
> > > Of course we can. Just bail out of gpiochip_add_data_with_key() if it
> > > is. But that's material for a different patch.
> >
> > Yes, but my point here is that
> > 1) the current users are already following this requirement;
> > 2) the enforcement can be done explicitly somewhere (in the register function).
> >
> > Is the 1) incorrect assumption?
> 
> I remember doing a quick glance over GPIO providers and it looks like
> ALL of them set the label. But I may have missed something. I would
> start with a warning.

For now I would drop the NULL check. We will have a few weeks to see
if somebody screams about. Meanwhile we can add the real error message
patch if no-one complains.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

Re: [PATCH v3 04/11] gpiolib: provide gpio_device_find_by_label()

[Bartosz Golaszewski]

On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 3:48 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 02:42:28PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 2:33 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 01:22:36PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 9:19 AM Andy Shevchenko
> > > > <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 05:03:19PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > > > > > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
>
> ...
>
> > > > > > +static int gpio_chip_match_by_label(struct gpio_chip *gc, void *label)
> > > > > > +{
> > > > > > +     return gc->label && !strcmp(gc->label, label);
> > > > > > +}
> > > > >
> > > > > I am still wondering if we can oblige providers to have label to be non-empty.
> > > >
> > > > Of course we can. Just bail out of gpiochip_add_data_with_key() if it
> > > > is. But that's material for a different patch.
> > >
> > > Yes, but my point here is that
> > > 1) the current users are already following this requirement;
> > > 2) the enforcement can be done explicitly somewhere (in the register function).
> > >
> > > Is the 1) incorrect assumption?
> >
> > I remember doing a quick glance over GPIO providers and it looks like
> > ALL of them set the label. But I may have missed something. I would
> > start with a warning.
>
> For now I would drop the NULL check. We will have a few weeks to see
> if somebody screams about. Meanwhile we can add the real error message
> patch if no-one complains.

No, I'm not going to potentially break stuff like that as a way to
detect bugs. That's not a hot path, we're not gaining much. Let's add
a warning first, wait for some time, make it an error and then remove
the check.

Bart