Re: [libgpiod][PATCH 1/3] bindings: rust: fix soundness of line_info modeling

[Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>]

On 28-09-23, 15:24, Erik Schilling wrote:
> > +/// Line info
> > +///
> > +/// This is the owned counterpart to [Info]. Due to a [Deref] implementation,
> > +/// all functions of [Info] can also be called on this type.
> > +#[derive(Debug)]
> > +pub struct InfoOwned {
> > +    info: *mut gpiod::gpiod_line_info,
> > +}
> 
> While going through all the structs in order to add missing `Send`
> implementations, it occured to me that it may be a bit confusing if
> only this one type has the `Owned` suffix, while the others are also
> "owned" but do not carry that suffix.
> 
> Not really sure how to resolve this... We could rename the non-owned
> `Info` to something like `InfoRef` and turn `InfoOwned` back into
> `Info`, but reading `&InfoRef` may be a bit weird?

I like this one and none of the others.

> Alternatively, we could rename all other structs to add the suffix...
> Then, "Owned" would maybe sound confusing - given that no un-owned
> variant exists.
> Maybe "Box" would be a more suitable suffix in that case - borrowing
> from the Box type name [1]?
> 
> Any opinions here?
> 
> [1] https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/boxed/struct.Box.html

-- 
viresh