linux-gpio.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Chengfeng Ye <dg573847474@gmail.com>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>,
	Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
	linus.walleij@linaro.org, brgl@bgdev.pl,
	linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.15 07/10] gpio: timberdale: Fix potential deadlock on &tgpio->lock
Date: Sat,  7 Oct 2023 20:49:46 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231008004950.3768189-7-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231008004950.3768189-1-sashal@kernel.org>

From: Chengfeng Ye <dg573847474@gmail.com>

[ Upstream commit 9e8bc2dda5a7a8e2babc9975f4b11c9a6196e490 ]

As timbgpio_irq_enable()/timbgpio_irq_disable() callback could be
executed under irq context, it could introduce double locks on
&tgpio->lock if it preempts other execution units requiring
the same locks.

timbgpio_gpio_set()
--> timbgpio_update_bit()
--> spin_lock(&tgpio->lock)
<interrupt>
   --> timbgpio_irq_disable()
   --> spin_lock_irqsave(&tgpio->lock)

This flaw was found by an experimental static analysis tool I am
developing for irq-related deadlock.

To prevent the potential deadlock, the patch uses spin_lock_irqsave()
on &tgpio->lock inside timbgpio_gpio_set() to prevent the possible
deadlock scenario.

Signed-off-by: Chengfeng Ye <dg573847474@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpio-timberdale.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-timberdale.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-timberdale.c
index de14949a3fe5a..92c1f2baa4bff 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-timberdale.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-timberdale.c
@@ -43,9 +43,10 @@ static int timbgpio_update_bit(struct gpio_chip *gpio, unsigned index,
 	unsigned offset, bool enabled)
 {
 	struct timbgpio *tgpio = gpiochip_get_data(gpio);
+	unsigned long flags;
 	u32 reg;
 
-	spin_lock(&tgpio->lock);
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&tgpio->lock, flags);
 	reg = ioread32(tgpio->membase + offset);
 
 	if (enabled)
@@ -54,7 +55,7 @@ static int timbgpio_update_bit(struct gpio_chip *gpio, unsigned index,
 		reg &= ~(1 << index);
 
 	iowrite32(reg, tgpio->membase + offset);
-	spin_unlock(&tgpio->lock);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tgpio->lock, flags);
 
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.40.1


           reply	other threads:[~2023-10-08  0:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed
 [parent not found: <20231008004950.3768189-1-sashal@kernel.org>]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231008004950.3768189-7-sashal@kernel.org \
    --to=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=andy@kernel.org \
    --cc=bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org \
    --cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
    --cc=dg573847474@gmail.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).