From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Kent Gibson <warthog618@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Subject: [RFC PATCH] gpiolib: remove extra_checks
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2023 21:11:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231219201102.41639-1-brgl@bgdev.pl> (raw)
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
extra_checks is only used in a few places. It also depends on
a non-standard DEBUG define one needs to add to the source file. The
overhead of removing it should be minimal (we already use pure
might_sleep() in the code anyway) so drop it.
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
---
drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 31 +++++++++----------------------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
index c9ca809b55de..837e9919bf07 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
@@ -47,19 +47,6 @@
* GPIOs can sometimes cost only an instruction or two per bit.
*/
-
-/* When debugging, extend minimal trust to callers and platform code.
- * Also emit diagnostic messages that may help initial bringup, when
- * board setup or driver bugs are most common.
- *
- * Otherwise, minimize overhead in what may be bitbanging codepaths.
- */
-#ifdef DEBUG
-#define extra_checks 1
-#else
-#define extra_checks 0
-#endif
-
/* Device and char device-related information */
static DEFINE_IDA(gpio_ida);
static dev_t gpio_devt;
@@ -2351,7 +2338,7 @@ void gpiod_free(struct gpio_desc *desc)
return;
if (!gpiod_free_commit(desc))
- WARN_ON(extra_checks);
+ WARN_ON(1);
module_put(desc->gdev->owner);
gpio_device_put(desc->gdev);
@@ -3729,7 +3716,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpiochip_line_is_persistent);
*/
int gpiod_get_raw_value_cansleep(const struct gpio_desc *desc)
{
- might_sleep_if(extra_checks);
+ might_sleep();
VALIDATE_DESC(desc);
return gpiod_get_raw_value_commit(desc);
}
@@ -3748,7 +3735,7 @@ int gpiod_get_value_cansleep(const struct gpio_desc *desc)
{
int value;
- might_sleep_if(extra_checks);
+ might_sleep();
VALIDATE_DESC(desc);
value = gpiod_get_raw_value_commit(desc);
if (value < 0)
@@ -3779,7 +3766,7 @@ int gpiod_get_raw_array_value_cansleep(unsigned int array_size,
struct gpio_array *array_info,
unsigned long *value_bitmap)
{
- might_sleep_if(extra_checks);
+ might_sleep();
if (!desc_array)
return -EINVAL;
return gpiod_get_array_value_complex(true, true, array_size,
@@ -3805,7 +3792,7 @@ int gpiod_get_array_value_cansleep(unsigned int array_size,
struct gpio_array *array_info,
unsigned long *value_bitmap)
{
- might_sleep_if(extra_checks);
+ might_sleep();
if (!desc_array)
return -EINVAL;
return gpiod_get_array_value_complex(false, true, array_size,
@@ -3826,7 +3813,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpiod_get_array_value_cansleep);
*/
void gpiod_set_raw_value_cansleep(struct gpio_desc *desc, int value)
{
- might_sleep_if(extra_checks);
+ might_sleep();
VALIDATE_DESC_VOID(desc);
gpiod_set_raw_value_commit(desc, value);
}
@@ -3844,7 +3831,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpiod_set_raw_value_cansleep);
*/
void gpiod_set_value_cansleep(struct gpio_desc *desc, int value)
{
- might_sleep_if(extra_checks);
+ might_sleep();
VALIDATE_DESC_VOID(desc);
gpiod_set_value_nocheck(desc, value);
}
@@ -3867,7 +3854,7 @@ int gpiod_set_raw_array_value_cansleep(unsigned int array_size,
struct gpio_array *array_info,
unsigned long *value_bitmap)
{
- might_sleep_if(extra_checks);
+ might_sleep();
if (!desc_array)
return -EINVAL;
return gpiod_set_array_value_complex(true, true, array_size, desc_array,
@@ -3909,7 +3896,7 @@ int gpiod_set_array_value_cansleep(unsigned int array_size,
struct gpio_array *array_info,
unsigned long *value_bitmap)
{
- might_sleep_if(extra_checks);
+ might_sleep();
if (!desc_array)
return -EINVAL;
return gpiod_set_array_value_complex(false, true, array_size,
--
2.40.1
next reply other threads:[~2023-12-19 20:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-19 20:11 Bartosz Golaszewski [this message]
2023-12-20 11:35 ` [RFC PATCH] gpiolib: remove extra_checks Linus Walleij
2023-12-20 14:03 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-12-20 14:08 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2023-12-20 15:28 ` Linus Walleij
2023-12-21 9:26 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2023-12-21 12:52 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-12-21 13:00 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2023-12-21 16:13 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-12-21 18:50 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2023-12-27 14:59 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-16 18:23 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-01-16 21:41 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-16 22:34 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-01-17 8:51 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231219201102.41639-1-brgl@bgdev.pl \
--to=brgl@bgdev.pl \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=warthog618@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).