From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BA2415956D; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 16:30:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706545852; cv=none; b=dv/jj1WY1+0Q6DI+oHEyFO2N2E1a8qrAnip93s7JBYfTnw+CJy02JlmaQvi4nBrE+KN1yxXNSCdJAa9ayfwPuQ8NyNknlZP2TuQpBPhWr/BN1vp/C8oJomSVmT+qRhSNht3xiXYTAA4f9YX6sR7DOUY2brGSXL0+cuEZMWPWSeE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706545852; c=relaxed/simple; bh=W6TMqRtC+7055PVNc/k+MoT8M6gVLJlYB+nOkTGTGBE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=kZLV/jwypAnlWnIwyo1rB/V4RWgCDrWGVUx6EnIhxphpsbIfj6CHOb63gfxyJSTvpqvYGBttjl5ERr08+ltWP17gARWiAmF50GfSkKw9XLSLgFXzs9DWvQT00fPpjpj9i8eYd2iha4IJZeaL5GTM+Y5R8V2pxQSmq6o9/4y5eQk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A95ADA7; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 08:31:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from bogus (unknown [10.57.78.35]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C67DC3F738; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 08:30:45 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 16:30:43 +0000 From: Sudeep Holla To: Peng Fan Cc: Cristian Marussi , Rob Herring , Sudeep Holla , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Oleksii Moisieiev , Linus Walleij , Shawn Guo , Sascha Hauer , Pengutronix Kernel Team , Fabio Estevam , NXP Linux Team , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, AKASHI Takahiro , Peng Fan , Rob Herring Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] firmware: arm_scmi: Add SCMI v3.2 pincontrol protocol basic support Message-ID: <20240129163043.if5jj4kyacqfe2n5@bogus> References: <20240121-pinctrl-scmi-v3-0-8d94ba79dca8@nxp.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 08:36:50PM +0800, Peng Fan wrote: > Hi Sudeep, Cristian > > Would you pick up patch 1-4? I will for v6.9 sometime. > And for i.MX95 OEM extenstion, do you have any suggestions? > I have two points: > 1. use vendor compatible. This would also benefit when supporting vendor > protocol. May be, but that was never on plate for standard protocols. So I don't like that approach either. > 2. Introduce a property saying supporting-generic-pinconf > I am not sure what you mean by that. But that doesn't sound right especial in context of SCMI. So I would say no. > How do you think? > I don't have any other suggestions than fix your driver to use the pinmux properly with features in the upstream pinmux subsystem. -- Regards, Sudeep