From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Kent Gibson <warthog618@gmail.com>, Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 04/22] gpio: provide and use gpiod_get_label()
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 13:48:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240130124828.14678-5-brgl@bgdev.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240130124828.14678-1-brgl@bgdev.pl>
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
We will soon serialize access to the descriptor label using SRCU. The
write-side of the protection will require calling synchronize_srcu()
which must not be called from atomic context. We have two irq helpers:
gpiochip_lock_as_irq() and gpiochip_unlock_as_irq() that set the label
if the GPIO is not requested but is being used as interrupt. They are
called with a spinlock held from the interrupt subsystem.
They must not do it if we are to use SRCU so instead let's move the
special corner case to a dedicated getter.
First: let's implement and use the getter where it's applicable.
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
---
drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c | 4 ++--
drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 9 +++++++--
drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h | 1 +
3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c
index 34d6712fa07c..2c0a0700762d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c
@@ -2305,8 +2305,8 @@ static void gpio_desc_to_lineinfo(struct gpio_desc *desc,
if (desc->name)
strscpy(info->name, desc->name, sizeof(info->name));
- if (desc->label)
- strscpy(info->consumer, desc->label,
+ if (gpiod_get_label(desc))
+ strscpy(info->consumer, gpiod_get_label(desc),
sizeof(info->consumer));
dflags = READ_ONCE(desc->flags);
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
index 543d80457647..d0a2f014dacd 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
@@ -105,6 +105,11 @@ static void gpiochip_irqchip_free_valid_mask(struct gpio_chip *gc);
static bool gpiolib_initialized;
+const char *gpiod_get_label(struct gpio_desc *desc)
+{
+ return desc->label;
+}
+
static inline void desc_set_label(struct gpio_desc *d, const char *label)
{
d->label = label;
@@ -2382,7 +2387,7 @@ char *gpiochip_dup_line_label(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset)
*
* Until this happens, this allocation needs to be atomic.
*/
- label = kstrdup(desc->label, GFP_ATOMIC);
+ label = kstrdup(gpiod_get_label(desc), GFP_ATOMIC);
if (!label)
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
@@ -4719,7 +4724,7 @@ static void gpiolib_dbg_show(struct seq_file *s, struct gpio_device *gdev)
is_irq = test_bit(FLAG_USED_AS_IRQ, &desc->flags);
active_low = test_bit(FLAG_ACTIVE_LOW, &desc->flags);
seq_printf(s, " gpio-%-3d (%-20.20s|%-20.20s) %s %s %s%s\n",
- gpio, desc->name ?: "", desc->label,
+ gpio, desc->name ?: "", gpiod_get_label(desc),
is_out ? "out" : "in ",
value >= 0 ? (value ? "hi" : "lo") : "? ",
is_irq ? "IRQ " : "",
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h
index c3ae5bfa3f2e..1058f326fe2b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h
@@ -208,6 +208,7 @@ int gpio_set_debounce_timeout(struct gpio_desc *desc, unsigned int debounce);
int gpiod_hog(struct gpio_desc *desc, const char *name,
unsigned long lflags, enum gpiod_flags dflags);
int gpiochip_get_ngpios(struct gpio_chip *gc, struct device *dev);
+const char *gpiod_get_label(struct gpio_desc *desc);
/*
* Return the GPIO number of the passed descriptor relative to its chip
--
2.40.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-30 12:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-30 12:48 [PATCH 00/22] gpio: rework locking and object life-time control Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-30 12:48 ` [PATCH 01/22] gpio: protect the list of GPIO devices with SRCU Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-31 9:34 ` kernel test robot
2024-01-31 12:45 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-31 15:01 ` Linus Walleij
2024-01-30 12:48 ` [PATCH 02/22] gpio: of: assign and read the hog pointer atomically Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-31 17:38 ` Linus Walleij
2024-01-30 12:48 ` [PATCH 03/22] gpio: remove unused logging helpers Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-31 17:39 ` Linus Walleij
2024-01-31 18:08 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-31 20:33 ` Linus Walleij
2024-01-30 12:48 ` Bartosz Golaszewski [this message]
2024-01-31 19:36 ` [PATCH 04/22] gpio: provide and use gpiod_get_label() Linus Walleij
2024-01-30 12:48 ` [PATCH 05/22] gpio: don't set label from irq helpers Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-31 19:38 ` Linus Walleij
2024-01-30 12:48 ` [PATCH 06/22] gpio: add SRCU infrastructure to struct gpio_desc Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-31 19:35 ` Linus Walleij
2024-01-30 12:48 ` [PATCH 07/22] gpio: protect the descriptor label with SRCU Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-31 19:41 ` Linus Walleij
2024-01-30 12:48 ` [PATCH 08/22] gpio: sysfs: use gpio_device_find() to iterate over existing devices Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-31 19:42 ` Linus Walleij
2024-01-30 12:48 ` [PATCH 09/22] gpio: remove gpio_lock Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-31 19:51 ` Linus Walleij
2024-01-30 12:48 ` [PATCH 10/22] gpio: reinforce desc->flags handling Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-31 20:01 ` Linus Walleij
2024-01-31 20:35 ` Linus Walleij
2024-02-01 18:30 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-30 12:48 ` [PATCH 11/22] gpio: remove unneeded code from gpio_device_get_desc() Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-31 20:02 ` Linus Walleij
2024-01-30 12:48 ` [PATCH 12/22] gpio: sysfs: extend the critical section for unregistering sysfs devices Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-31 20:06 ` Linus Walleij
2024-01-30 12:48 ` [PATCH 13/22] gpio: sysfs: pass the GPIO device - not chip - to sysfs callbacks Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-31 20:09 ` Linus Walleij
2024-01-30 12:48 ` [PATCH 14/22] gpio: cdev: replace gpiochip_get_desc() with gpio_device_get_desc() Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-31 20:10 ` Linus Walleij
2024-01-30 12:48 ` [PATCH 15/22] gpio: cdev: don't access gdev->chip if it's not needed Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-31 20:11 ` Linus Walleij
2024-01-30 12:48 ` [PATCH 16/22] gpio: reduce the functionality of validate_desc() Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-31 20:16 ` Linus Walleij
2024-01-31 20:19 ` Linus Walleij
2024-01-30 12:48 ` [PATCH 17/22] gpio: remove unnecessary checks from gpiod_to_chip() Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-30 12:48 ` [PATCH 18/22] gpio: add the can_sleep flag to struct gpio_device Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-31 20:17 ` Linus Walleij
2024-01-30 12:48 ` [PATCH 19/22] gpio: add SRCU infrastructure " Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-30 12:48 ` [PATCH 20/22] gpio: protect the pointer to gpio_chip in gpio_device with SRCU Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-31 0:41 ` kernel test robot
2024-01-31 8:15 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-31 2:20 ` kernel test robot
2024-01-31 9:02 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-31 9:24 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-01-31 9:28 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-31 9:41 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-31 9:42 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-01-31 10:17 ` brgl
2024-01-31 11:00 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-01-31 12:23 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-31 20:23 ` Linus Walleij
2024-02-01 5:03 ` Dan Carpenter
2024-02-01 7:57 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-30 12:48 ` [PATCH 21/22] gpio: remove the RW semaphore from the GPIO device Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-31 20:24 ` Linus Walleij
2024-01-30 12:48 ` [PATCH 22/22] gpio: mark unsafe gpio_chip manipulators as deprecated Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-31 20:29 ` Linus Walleij
2024-02-01 9:14 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-31 20:32 ` [PATCH 00/22] gpio: rework locking and object life-time control Linus Walleij
2024-02-01 8:43 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240130124828.14678-5-brgl@bgdev.pl \
--to=brgl@bgdev.pl \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org \
--cc=elder@linaro.org \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=warthog618@gmail.com \
--cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).