From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Kent Gibson <warthog618@gmail.com>, Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 08/22] gpio: sysfs: use gpio_device_find() to iterate over existing devices
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 13:48:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240130124828.14678-9-brgl@bgdev.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240130124828.14678-1-brgl@bgdev.pl>
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
With the list of GPIO devices now protected with SRCU we can use
gpio_device_find() to traverse it from sysfs.
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
---
drivers/gpio/gpiolib-sysfs.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++--------------------
drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h | 1 -
3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-sysfs.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-sysfs.c
index 6bf5332136e5..3c3b8559cff5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-sysfs.c
@@ -790,11 +790,24 @@ void gpiochip_sysfs_unregister(struct gpio_device *gdev)
}
}
+static int gpiofind_sysfs_register(struct gpio_chip *gc, void *data)
+{
+ struct gpio_device *gdev = gc->gpiodev;
+ int ret;
+
+ if (gdev->mockdev)
+ return 0;
+
+ ret = gpiochip_sysfs_register(gdev);
+ if (ret)
+ chip_err(gc, "failed to register the sysfs entry: %d\n", ret);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int __init gpiolib_sysfs_init(void)
{
- int status;
- unsigned long flags;
- struct gpio_device *gdev;
+ int status;
status = class_register(&gpio_class);
if (status < 0)
@@ -806,26 +819,8 @@ static int __init gpiolib_sysfs_init(void)
* We run before arch_initcall() so chip->dev nodes can have
* registered, and so arch_initcall() can always gpiod_export().
*/
- spin_lock_irqsave(&gpio_lock, flags);
- list_for_each_entry(gdev, &gpio_devices, list) {
- if (gdev->mockdev)
- continue;
+ gpio_device_find(NULL, gpiofind_sysfs_register);
- /*
- * TODO we yield gpio_lock here because
- * gpiochip_sysfs_register() acquires a mutex. This is unsafe
- * and needs to be fixed.
- *
- * Also it would be nice to use gpio_device_find() here so we
- * can keep gpio_chips local to gpiolib.c, but the yield of
- * gpio_lock prevents us from doing this.
- */
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gpio_lock, flags);
- status = gpiochip_sysfs_register(gdev);
- spin_lock_irqsave(&gpio_lock, flags);
- }
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gpio_lock, flags);
-
- return status;
+ return 0;
}
postcore_initcall(gpiolib_sysfs_init);
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
index 93b80f3e9fe2..87d05134384e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ DEFINE_SPINLOCK(gpio_lock);
static DEFINE_MUTEX(gpio_lookup_lock);
static LIST_HEAD(gpio_lookup_list);
-LIST_HEAD(gpio_devices);
+static LIST_HEAD(gpio_devices);
/* Protects the GPIO device list against concurrent modifications. */
static DEFINE_MUTEX(gpio_devices_lock);
/* Ensures coherence during read-only accesses to the list of GPIO devices. */
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h
index d2e73eea9e92..2bf3f9e13ae4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h
@@ -136,7 +136,6 @@ int gpiod_set_array_value_complex(bool raw, bool can_sleep,
int gpiod_set_transitory(struct gpio_desc *desc, bool transitory);
extern spinlock_t gpio_lock;
-extern struct list_head gpio_devices;
void gpiod_line_state_notify(struct gpio_desc *desc, unsigned long action);
--
2.40.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-30 12:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-30 12:48 [PATCH 00/22] gpio: rework locking and object life-time control Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-30 12:48 ` [PATCH 01/22] gpio: protect the list of GPIO devices with SRCU Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-31 9:34 ` kernel test robot
2024-01-31 12:45 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-31 15:01 ` Linus Walleij
2024-01-30 12:48 ` [PATCH 02/22] gpio: of: assign and read the hog pointer atomically Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-31 17:38 ` Linus Walleij
2024-01-30 12:48 ` [PATCH 03/22] gpio: remove unused logging helpers Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-31 17:39 ` Linus Walleij
2024-01-31 18:08 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-31 20:33 ` Linus Walleij
2024-01-30 12:48 ` [PATCH 04/22] gpio: provide and use gpiod_get_label() Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-31 19:36 ` Linus Walleij
2024-01-30 12:48 ` [PATCH 05/22] gpio: don't set label from irq helpers Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-31 19:38 ` Linus Walleij
2024-01-30 12:48 ` [PATCH 06/22] gpio: add SRCU infrastructure to struct gpio_desc Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-31 19:35 ` Linus Walleij
2024-01-30 12:48 ` [PATCH 07/22] gpio: protect the descriptor label with SRCU Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-31 19:41 ` Linus Walleij
2024-01-30 12:48 ` Bartosz Golaszewski [this message]
2024-01-31 19:42 ` [PATCH 08/22] gpio: sysfs: use gpio_device_find() to iterate over existing devices Linus Walleij
2024-01-30 12:48 ` [PATCH 09/22] gpio: remove gpio_lock Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-31 19:51 ` Linus Walleij
2024-01-30 12:48 ` [PATCH 10/22] gpio: reinforce desc->flags handling Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-31 20:01 ` Linus Walleij
2024-01-31 20:35 ` Linus Walleij
2024-02-01 18:30 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-30 12:48 ` [PATCH 11/22] gpio: remove unneeded code from gpio_device_get_desc() Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-31 20:02 ` Linus Walleij
2024-01-30 12:48 ` [PATCH 12/22] gpio: sysfs: extend the critical section for unregistering sysfs devices Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-31 20:06 ` Linus Walleij
2024-01-30 12:48 ` [PATCH 13/22] gpio: sysfs: pass the GPIO device - not chip - to sysfs callbacks Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-31 20:09 ` Linus Walleij
2024-01-30 12:48 ` [PATCH 14/22] gpio: cdev: replace gpiochip_get_desc() with gpio_device_get_desc() Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-31 20:10 ` Linus Walleij
2024-01-30 12:48 ` [PATCH 15/22] gpio: cdev: don't access gdev->chip if it's not needed Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-31 20:11 ` Linus Walleij
2024-01-30 12:48 ` [PATCH 16/22] gpio: reduce the functionality of validate_desc() Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-31 20:16 ` Linus Walleij
2024-01-31 20:19 ` Linus Walleij
2024-01-30 12:48 ` [PATCH 17/22] gpio: remove unnecessary checks from gpiod_to_chip() Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-30 12:48 ` [PATCH 18/22] gpio: add the can_sleep flag to struct gpio_device Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-31 20:17 ` Linus Walleij
2024-01-30 12:48 ` [PATCH 19/22] gpio: add SRCU infrastructure " Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-30 12:48 ` [PATCH 20/22] gpio: protect the pointer to gpio_chip in gpio_device with SRCU Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-31 0:41 ` kernel test robot
2024-01-31 8:15 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-31 2:20 ` kernel test robot
2024-01-31 9:02 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-31 9:24 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-01-31 9:28 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-31 9:41 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-31 9:42 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-01-31 10:17 ` brgl
2024-01-31 11:00 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-01-31 12:23 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-31 20:23 ` Linus Walleij
2024-02-01 5:03 ` Dan Carpenter
2024-02-01 7:57 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-30 12:48 ` [PATCH 21/22] gpio: remove the RW semaphore from the GPIO device Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-31 20:24 ` Linus Walleij
2024-01-30 12:48 ` [PATCH 22/22] gpio: mark unsafe gpio_chip manipulators as deprecated Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-31 20:29 ` Linus Walleij
2024-02-01 9:14 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-31 20:32 ` [PATCH 00/22] gpio: rework locking and object life-time control Linus Walleij
2024-02-01 8:43 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240130124828.14678-9-brgl@bgdev.pl \
--to=brgl@bgdev.pl \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org \
--cc=elder@linaro.org \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=warthog618@gmail.com \
--cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).