linux-gpio.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Kent Gibson <warthog618@gmail.com>, Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
	"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3 20/24] gpio: add the can_sleep flag to struct gpio_device
Date: Thu,  8 Feb 2024 10:59:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240208095920.8035-21-brgl@bgdev.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240208095920.8035-1-brgl@bgdev.pl>

From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>

Duplicating the can_sleep value in GPIO device will allow us to not
needlessly dereference the chip pointer in several places and reduce the
number of SRCU read-only critical sections.

Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 11 ++++++-----
 drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h |  3 +++
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
index 140a44dec0be..6b696087c7f5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
@@ -901,6 +901,7 @@ int gpiochip_add_data_with_key(struct gpio_chip *gc, void *data,
 	}
 
 	gdev->ngpio = gc->ngpio;
+	gdev->can_sleep = gc->can_sleep;
 
 	scoped_guard(mutex, &gpio_devices_lock) {
 		/*
@@ -3072,7 +3073,7 @@ int gpiod_get_raw_value(const struct gpio_desc *desc)
 {
 	VALIDATE_DESC(desc);
 	/* Should be using gpiod_get_raw_value_cansleep() */
-	WARN_ON(desc->gdev->chip->can_sleep);
+	WARN_ON(desc->gdev->can_sleep);
 	return gpiod_get_raw_value_commit(desc);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpiod_get_raw_value);
@@ -3093,7 +3094,7 @@ int gpiod_get_value(const struct gpio_desc *desc)
 
 	VALIDATE_DESC(desc);
 	/* Should be using gpiod_get_value_cansleep() */
-	WARN_ON(desc->gdev->chip->can_sleep);
+	WARN_ON(desc->gdev->can_sleep);
 
 	value = gpiod_get_raw_value_commit(desc);
 	if (value < 0)
@@ -3366,7 +3367,7 @@ void gpiod_set_raw_value(struct gpio_desc *desc, int value)
 {
 	VALIDATE_DESC_VOID(desc);
 	/* Should be using gpiod_set_raw_value_cansleep() */
-	WARN_ON(desc->gdev->chip->can_sleep);
+	WARN_ON(desc->gdev->can_sleep);
 	gpiod_set_raw_value_commit(desc, value);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpiod_set_raw_value);
@@ -3407,7 +3408,7 @@ void gpiod_set_value(struct gpio_desc *desc, int value)
 {
 	VALIDATE_DESC_VOID(desc);
 	/* Should be using gpiod_set_value_cansleep() */
-	WARN_ON(desc->gdev->chip->can_sleep);
+	WARN_ON(desc->gdev->can_sleep);
 	gpiod_set_value_nocheck(desc, value);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpiod_set_value);
@@ -3471,7 +3472,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpiod_set_array_value);
 int gpiod_cansleep(const struct gpio_desc *desc)
 {
 	VALIDATE_DESC(desc);
-	return desc->gdev->chip->can_sleep;
+	return desc->gdev->can_sleep;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpiod_cansleep);
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h
index 9b7afe87f1bd..43ff4931e2c3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h
@@ -34,6 +34,8 @@
  * @descs: array of ngpio descriptors.
  * @ngpio: the number of GPIO lines on this GPIO device, equal to the size
  * of the @descs array.
+ * @can_sleep: indicate whether the GPIO chip driver's callbacks can sleep
+ * implying that they cannot be used from atomic context
  * @base: GPIO base in the DEPRECATED global Linux GPIO numberspace, assigned
  * at device creation time.
  * @label: a descriptive name for the GPIO device, such as the part number
@@ -64,6 +66,7 @@ struct gpio_device {
 	struct gpio_desc	*descs;
 	int			base;
 	u16			ngpio;
+	bool			can_sleep;
 	const char		*label;
 	void			*data;
 	struct list_head        list;
-- 
2.40.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-02-08  9:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-08  9:58 [PATCH v3 00/24] gpio: rework locking and object life-time control Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-08  9:58 ` [PATCH v3 01/24] gpio: protect the list of GPIO devices with SRCU Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-10 11:00   ` Hillf Danton
2024-02-10 11:07     ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-08  9:58 ` [PATCH v3 02/24] gpio: of: assign and read the hog pointer atomically Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-08  9:58 ` [PATCH v3 03/24] gpio: remove unused logging helpers Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-08  9:59 ` [PATCH v3 04/24] gpio: provide and use gpiod_get_label() Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-08  9:59 ` [PATCH v3 05/24] gpio: don't set label from irq helpers Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-08  9:59 ` [PATCH v3 06/24] gpio: add SRCU infrastructure to struct gpio_desc Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-08  9:59 ` [PATCH v3 07/24] gpio: protect the descriptor label with SRCU Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-12 14:56   ` kernel test robot
2024-02-13 21:16   ` Mark Brown
2024-02-13 22:07     ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-08  9:59 ` [PATCH v3 08/24] gpio: sysfs: use gpio_device_find() to iterate over existing devices Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-08  9:59 ` [PATCH v3 09/24] gpio: remove gpio_lock Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-08  9:59 ` [PATCH v3 10/24] gpio: reinforce desc->flags handling Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-08  9:59 ` [PATCH v3 11/24] gpio: remove unneeded code from gpio_device_get_desc() Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-08  9:59 ` [PATCH v3 12/24] gpio: sysfs: extend the critical section for unregistering sysfs devices Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-08  9:59 ` [PATCH v3 13/24] gpio: sysfs: pass the GPIO device - not chip - to sysfs callbacks Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-08  9:59 ` [PATCH v3 14/24] gpio: cdev: replace gpiochip_get_desc() with gpio_device_get_desc() Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-08  9:59 ` [PATCH v3 15/24] gpio: cdev: don't access gdev->chip if it's not needed Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-08  9:59 ` [PATCH v3 16/24] gpio: sysfs: " Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-08 12:20   ` Linus Walleij
2024-02-08  9:59 ` [PATCH v3 17/24] gpio: don't dereference gdev->chip in gpiochip_setup_dev() Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-08 12:21   ` Linus Walleij
2024-02-08  9:59 ` [PATCH v3 18/24] gpio: reduce the functionality of validate_desc() Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-08  9:59 ` [PATCH v3 19/24] gpio: remove unnecessary checks from gpiod_to_chip() Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-08 17:39   ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-02-08 19:17     ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-08 19:24       ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-02-08 19:34         ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-09 13:59           ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-02-08  9:59 ` Bartosz Golaszewski [this message]
2024-02-08  9:59 ` [PATCH v3 21/24] gpio: add SRCU infrastructure to struct gpio_device Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-08  9:59 ` [PATCH v3 22/24] gpio: protect the pointer to gpio_chip in gpio_device with SRCU Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-12 15:09   ` kernel test robot
2024-02-12 16:56     ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-12 21:20     ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-13  8:10       ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-08  9:59 ` [PATCH v3 23/24] gpio: remove the RW semaphore from the GPIO device Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-10  5:37   ` Kent Gibson
2024-02-12  9:53     ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-12  9:57       ` Kent Gibson
2024-02-12  9:59         ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-08  9:59 ` [PATCH v3 24/24] gpio: mark unsafe gpio_chip manipulators as deprecated Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-08 17:43 ` [PATCH v3 00/24] gpio: rework locking and object life-time control Andy Shevchenko
2024-02-12 10:07 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
     [not found] ` <CGME20240213120518eucas1p2d514aac6e6d1e29bbae05f32db6724db@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
2024-02-13 12:05   ` Marek Szyprowski
2024-02-13 12:08     ` Bartosz Golaszewski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240208095920.8035-21-brgl@bgdev.pl \
    --to=brgl@bgdev.pl \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org \
    --cc=elder@linaro.org \
    --cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=warthog618@gmail.com \
    --cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).