linux-gpio.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Kent Gibson <warthog618@gmail.com>, Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
	"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3 08/24] gpio: sysfs: use gpio_device_find() to iterate over existing devices
Date: Thu,  8 Feb 2024 10:59:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240208095920.8035-9-brgl@bgdev.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240208095920.8035-1-brgl@bgdev.pl>

From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>

With the list of GPIO devices now protected with SRCU we can use
gpio_device_find() to traverse it from sysfs.

Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpiolib-sysfs.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++------------------
 drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c       |  2 +-
 drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h       |  1 -
 3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-sysfs.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-sysfs.c
index 6bf5332136e5..d6ff044ce887 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-sysfs.c
@@ -790,11 +790,29 @@ void gpiochip_sysfs_unregister(struct gpio_device *gdev)
 	}
 }
 
+/*
+ * We're not really looking for a device - we just want to iterate over the
+ * list and call this callback for each GPIO device. This is why this function
+ * always returns 0.
+ */
+static int gpiofind_sysfs_register(struct gpio_chip *gc, void *data)
+{
+	struct gpio_device *gdev = gc->gpiodev;
+	int ret;
+
+	if (gdev->mockdev)
+		return 0;
+
+	ret = gpiochip_sysfs_register(gdev);
+	if (ret)
+		chip_err(gc, "failed to register the sysfs entry: %d\n", ret);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int __init gpiolib_sysfs_init(void)
 {
-	int		status;
-	unsigned long	flags;
-	struct gpio_device *gdev;
+	int status;
 
 	status = class_register(&gpio_class);
 	if (status < 0)
@@ -806,26 +824,8 @@ static int __init gpiolib_sysfs_init(void)
 	 * We run before arch_initcall() so chip->dev nodes can have
 	 * registered, and so arch_initcall() can always gpiod_export().
 	 */
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&gpio_lock, flags);
-	list_for_each_entry(gdev, &gpio_devices, list) {
-		if (gdev->mockdev)
-			continue;
+	(void)gpio_device_find(NULL, gpiofind_sysfs_register);
 
-		/*
-		 * TODO we yield gpio_lock here because
-		 * gpiochip_sysfs_register() acquires a mutex. This is unsafe
-		 * and needs to be fixed.
-		 *
-		 * Also it would be nice to use gpio_device_find() here so we
-		 * can keep gpio_chips local to gpiolib.c, but the yield of
-		 * gpio_lock prevents us from doing this.
-		 */
-		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gpio_lock, flags);
-		status = gpiochip_sysfs_register(gdev);
-		spin_lock_irqsave(&gpio_lock, flags);
-	}
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gpio_lock, flags);
-
-	return status;
+	return 0;
 }
 postcore_initcall(gpiolib_sysfs_init);
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
index a87ab8f013c4..68543ab34fb6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ DEFINE_SPINLOCK(gpio_lock);
 static DEFINE_MUTEX(gpio_lookup_lock);
 static LIST_HEAD(gpio_lookup_list);
 
-LIST_HEAD(gpio_devices);
+static LIST_HEAD(gpio_devices);
 /* Protects the GPIO device list against concurrent modifications. */
 static DEFINE_MUTEX(gpio_devices_lock);
 /* Ensures coherence during read-only accesses to the list of GPIO devices. */
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h
index d2e73eea9e92..2bf3f9e13ae4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h
@@ -136,7 +136,6 @@ int gpiod_set_array_value_complex(bool raw, bool can_sleep,
 int gpiod_set_transitory(struct gpio_desc *desc, bool transitory);
 
 extern spinlock_t gpio_lock;
-extern struct list_head gpio_devices;
 
 void gpiod_line_state_notify(struct gpio_desc *desc, unsigned long action);
 
-- 
2.40.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-02-08  9:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-08  9:58 [PATCH v3 00/24] gpio: rework locking and object life-time control Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-08  9:58 ` [PATCH v3 01/24] gpio: protect the list of GPIO devices with SRCU Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-10 11:00   ` Hillf Danton
2024-02-10 11:07     ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-08  9:58 ` [PATCH v3 02/24] gpio: of: assign and read the hog pointer atomically Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-08  9:58 ` [PATCH v3 03/24] gpio: remove unused logging helpers Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-08  9:59 ` [PATCH v3 04/24] gpio: provide and use gpiod_get_label() Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-08  9:59 ` [PATCH v3 05/24] gpio: don't set label from irq helpers Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-08  9:59 ` [PATCH v3 06/24] gpio: add SRCU infrastructure to struct gpio_desc Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-08  9:59 ` [PATCH v3 07/24] gpio: protect the descriptor label with SRCU Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-12 14:56   ` kernel test robot
2024-02-13 21:16   ` Mark Brown
2024-02-13 22:07     ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-08  9:59 ` Bartosz Golaszewski [this message]
2024-02-08  9:59 ` [PATCH v3 09/24] gpio: remove gpio_lock Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-08  9:59 ` [PATCH v3 10/24] gpio: reinforce desc->flags handling Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-08  9:59 ` [PATCH v3 11/24] gpio: remove unneeded code from gpio_device_get_desc() Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-08  9:59 ` [PATCH v3 12/24] gpio: sysfs: extend the critical section for unregistering sysfs devices Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-08  9:59 ` [PATCH v3 13/24] gpio: sysfs: pass the GPIO device - not chip - to sysfs callbacks Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-08  9:59 ` [PATCH v3 14/24] gpio: cdev: replace gpiochip_get_desc() with gpio_device_get_desc() Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-08  9:59 ` [PATCH v3 15/24] gpio: cdev: don't access gdev->chip if it's not needed Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-08  9:59 ` [PATCH v3 16/24] gpio: sysfs: " Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-08 12:20   ` Linus Walleij
2024-02-08  9:59 ` [PATCH v3 17/24] gpio: don't dereference gdev->chip in gpiochip_setup_dev() Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-08 12:21   ` Linus Walleij
2024-02-08  9:59 ` [PATCH v3 18/24] gpio: reduce the functionality of validate_desc() Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-08  9:59 ` [PATCH v3 19/24] gpio: remove unnecessary checks from gpiod_to_chip() Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-08 17:39   ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-02-08 19:17     ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-08 19:24       ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-02-08 19:34         ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-09 13:59           ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-02-08  9:59 ` [PATCH v3 20/24] gpio: add the can_sleep flag to struct gpio_device Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-08  9:59 ` [PATCH v3 21/24] gpio: add SRCU infrastructure " Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-08  9:59 ` [PATCH v3 22/24] gpio: protect the pointer to gpio_chip in gpio_device with SRCU Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-12 15:09   ` kernel test robot
2024-02-12 16:56     ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-12 21:20     ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-13  8:10       ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-08  9:59 ` [PATCH v3 23/24] gpio: remove the RW semaphore from the GPIO device Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-10  5:37   ` Kent Gibson
2024-02-12  9:53     ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-12  9:57       ` Kent Gibson
2024-02-12  9:59         ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-08  9:59 ` [PATCH v3 24/24] gpio: mark unsafe gpio_chip manipulators as deprecated Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-08 17:43 ` [PATCH v3 00/24] gpio: rework locking and object life-time control Andy Shevchenko
2024-02-12 10:07 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
     [not found] ` <CGME20240213120518eucas1p2d514aac6e6d1e29bbae05f32db6724db@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
2024-02-13 12:05   ` Marek Szyprowski
2024-02-13 12:08     ` Bartosz Golaszewski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240208095920.8035-9-brgl@bgdev.pl \
    --to=brgl@bgdev.pl \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org \
    --cc=elder@linaro.org \
    --cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=warthog618@gmail.com \
    --cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).