linux-gpio.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Kent Gibson <warthog618@gmail.com>, Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
	"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>,
	kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] gpio: use rcu_dereference_protected() to make lockdep happy
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 10:31:08 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240213093108.13922-4-brgl@bgdev.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240213093108.13922-1-brgl@bgdev.pl>

From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>

Lockdep with CONFIG_PROVE_RCU enabled reports false positives about
suspicious rcu_dereference() usage. Let's silence it by using
rcu_dereference_protected().

Fixes: d83cee3d2bb1 ("gpio: protect the pointer to gpio_chip in gpio_device with SRCU")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202402122234.d85cca9b-lkp@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 12 ++++++++----
 drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h |  4 +++-
 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
index c1391a9a0af6..d7503376b918 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
@@ -109,7 +109,8 @@ const char *gpiod_get_label(struct gpio_desc *desc)
 		return "interrupt";
 
 	return test_bit(FLAG_REQUESTED, &flags) ?
-			rcu_dereference(desc->label) : NULL;
+			rcu_dereference_protected(desc->label,
+					lockdep_is_held(&desc->srcu)) : NULL;
 }
 
 static int desc_set_label(struct gpio_desc *desc, const char *label)
@@ -2978,7 +2979,8 @@ static int gpiod_get_raw_value_commit(const struct gpio_desc *desc)
 
 	guard(srcu)(&gdev->srcu);
 
-	gc = rcu_dereference(gdev->chip);
+	gc = rcu_dereference_protected(gdev->chip,
+				       lockdep_is_held(&gdev->srcu));
 	if (!gc)
 		return -ENODEV;
 
@@ -3012,7 +3014,8 @@ static bool gpio_device_chip_cmp(struct gpio_device *gdev, struct gpio_chip *gc)
 {
 	guard(srcu)(&gdev->srcu);
 
-	return gc == rcu_dereference(gdev->chip);
+	return gc == rcu_dereference_protected(gdev->chip,
+					       lockdep_is_held(&gdev->srcu));
 }
 
 int gpiod_get_array_value_complex(bool raw, bool can_sleep,
@@ -3593,7 +3596,8 @@ int gpiod_to_irq(const struct gpio_desc *desc)
 	gdev = desc->gdev;
 	/* FIXME Cannot use gpio_chip_guard due to const desc. */
 	guard(srcu)(&gdev->srcu);
-	gc = rcu_dereference(gdev->chip);
+	gc = rcu_dereference_protected(gdev->chip,
+				       lockdep_is_held(&gdev->srcu));
 	if (!gc)
 		return -ENODEV;
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h
index 07443d26cbca..a857848b8955 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
 #include <linux/err.h>
 #include <linux/gpio/consumer.h> /* for enum gpiod_flags */
 #include <linux/gpio/driver.h>
+#include <linux/lockdep.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/notifier.h>
 #include <linux/srcu.h>
@@ -202,7 +203,8 @@ DEFINE_CLASS(gpio_chip_guard,
 
 		_guard.gdev = desc->gdev;
 		_guard.idx = srcu_read_lock(&_guard.gdev->srcu);
-		_guard.gc = rcu_dereference(_guard.gdev->chip);
+		_guard.gc = rcu_dereference_protected(_guard.gdev->chip,
+					lockdep_is_held(&_guard.gdev->srcu));
 
 		_guard;
 	     }),
-- 
2.40.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-02-13  9:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-13  9:31 [PATCH 0/3] gpio: fix SRCU bugs Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-13  9:31 ` [PATCH 1/3] gpio: take the SRCU read lock in gpiod_hog() Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-13 21:29   ` Linus Walleij
2024-02-13  9:31 ` [PATCH 2/3] gpio: cdev: use correct pointer accessors with SRCU Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-13 21:33   ` Linus Walleij
2024-02-13  9:31 ` Bartosz Golaszewski [this message]
2024-02-13 12:03   ` [PATCH 3/3] gpio: use rcu_dereference_protected() to make lockdep happy Paul E. McKenney
2024-02-13 12:06     ` Bartosz Golaszewski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240213093108.13922-4-brgl@bgdev.pl \
    --to=brgl@bgdev.pl \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org \
    --cc=elder@linaro.org \
    --cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=warthog618@gmail.com \
    --cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).