From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B1FC1B972; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 11:13:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.10 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710501191; cv=none; b=GMkLM8x5dbnd0GueRnU55pzgHP7SaugH8Y4vjy6vLNkWwCSjNz5yUM62ZKogbxr38oT+jpd32yOxqAUXyhAVqBVsZuyHz8nA/zbRbgPLbFD5htG7txNST8qA+cVr2Fk+Hzb7ZkafcPyxhxbVy3nuA4hSf083n7K7ulBx10h7l9M= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710501191; c=relaxed/simple; bh=g2fugJ9guH0dH0Kc//VxGG2YU3frt9CNJm8W5NG/wzA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=KBP/rj0XQmMnFkLa4ML88xW3qq/EURUm+CLac9wiXMo2yWtRZFDSR35al0MhCFzvQlt11I82+Bke3RHP9vR+galx5xdxIVnHNP8fknvXdbKyjovhqbk3tjk5FnYvSjL7gl6hgMi/aPQuelhmL6lbrUmKHxKQyazIxFL1YWr7T2c= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=Ebxw12Tx; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.10 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="Ebxw12Tx" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1710501190; x=1742037190; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=g2fugJ9guH0dH0Kc//VxGG2YU3frt9CNJm8W5NG/wzA=; b=Ebxw12TxUUsRjgCjKh8lu8j3P8Fu0wS4HEFHr+i3DFZAs3rJpWha1VrH WWyav8q5eansrvYjhK9qtZhVahsAC+k1S6MF4GcffVm+hT7NXs53ghzpW gz7e/ztbXu6eMOVoExkOaJvmRK+QazfVfRoAmVL9iFlYQZRpLnm/vrAyl ivyCKFrUmQefCK1CErDSdZ6Coth1JmHoMMEH8xENDF0mhmm3xgwl/SkWn wW7sp2RyvsU0awWZfO1JMM0JcWB51MrGuAkQfEJcuPmztghtk9PQCCuUE X9TMJhx2yPsrfrgs2TMQBHgKo5wWmjYniduB3o+ZQh6fn0lKlLRORxvFV w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11013"; a="22826050" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,128,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="22826050" Received: from orviesa009.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.149]) by orvoesa102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 15 Mar 2024 04:13:09 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,128,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="12677102" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO b21307750695) ([10.239.97.150]) by orviesa009.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 15 Mar 2024 04:13:06 -0700 Received: from kbuild by b21307750695 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1rl5Ul-000EN9-2e; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 11:13:03 +0000 Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 19:12:39 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Andy Shevchenko , Linus Walleij , AngeloGioacchino Del Regno , linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 04/11] pinctrl: aw9523: Make use of struct pinfunction and PINCTRL_PINFUNCTION() Message-ID: <202403151827.SQgOL8WH-lkp@intel.com> References: <20240313235422.180075-5-andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240313235422.180075-5-andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Hi Andy, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on linusw-pinctrl/devel] [also build test ERROR on linusw-pinctrl/for-next linus/master next-20240314] [cannot apply to v6.8] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Andy-Shevchenko/pinctrl-aw9523-Destroy-mutex-on-remove/20240314-075853 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-pinctrl.git devel patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240313235422.180075-5-andy.shevchenko%40gmail.com patch subject: [PATCH v1 04/11] pinctrl: aw9523: Make use of struct pinfunction and PINCTRL_PINFUNCTION() config: hexagon-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240315/202403151827.SQgOL8WH-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 19.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 503c55e17037436dcd45ac69dea8967e67e3f5e8) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240315/202403151827.SQgOL8WH-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202403151827.SQgOL8WH-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-aw9523.c:11: In file included from include/linux/gpio/driver.h:8: In file included from include/linux/irqchip/chained_irq.h:10: In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20: In file included from include/linux/io.h:13: In file included from arch/hexagon/include/asm/io.h:328: include/asm-generic/io.h:547:31: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 547 | val = __raw_readb(PCI_IOBASE + addr); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:560:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 560 | val = __le16_to_cpu((__le16 __force)__raw_readw(PCI_IOBASE + addr)); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/uapi/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h:37:51: note: expanded from macro '__le16_to_cpu' 37 | #define __le16_to_cpu(x) ((__force __u16)(__le16)(x)) | ^ In file included from drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-aw9523.c:11: In file included from include/linux/gpio/driver.h:8: In file included from include/linux/irqchip/chained_irq.h:10: In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20: In file included from include/linux/io.h:13: In file included from arch/hexagon/include/asm/io.h:328: include/asm-generic/io.h:573:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 573 | val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr)); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/uapi/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h:35:51: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu' 35 | #define __le32_to_cpu(x) ((__force __u32)(__le32)(x)) | ^ In file included from drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-aw9523.c:11: In file included from include/linux/gpio/driver.h:8: In file included from include/linux/irqchip/chained_irq.h:10: In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20: In file included from include/linux/io.h:13: In file included from arch/hexagon/include/asm/io.h:328: include/asm-generic/io.h:584:33: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 584 | __raw_writeb(value, PCI_IOBASE + addr); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:594:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 594 | __raw_writew((u16 __force)cpu_to_le16(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:604:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 604 | __raw_writel((u32 __force)cpu_to_le32(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ In file included from drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-aw9523.c:12: In file included from include/linux/i2c.h:19: In file included from include/linux/regulator/consumer.h:35: In file included from include/linux/suspend.h:5: In file included from include/linux/swap.h:9: In file included from include/linux/memcontrol.h:20: In file included from include/linux/mm.h:2188: include/linux/vmstat.h:522:36: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum node_stat_item' and 'enum lru_list') [-Wenum-enum-conversion] 522 | return node_stat_name(NR_LRU_BASE + lru) + 3; // skip "nr_" | ~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~ >> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-aw9523.c:170:29: error: no member named 'ngrpoups' in 'struct pinfunction'; did you mean 'ngroups'? 170 | *ngroups = aw9523_pmx[sel].ngrpoups; | ^~~~~~~~ | ngroups include/linux/pinctrl/pinctrl.h:218:9: note: 'ngroups' declared here 218 | size_t ngroups; | ^ 7 warnings and 1 error generated. vim +170 drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-aw9523.c 164 165 static int aw9523_pmx_get_groups(struct pinctrl_dev *pctl, unsigned int sel, 166 const char * const **groups, 167 unsigned int * const ngroups) 168 { 169 *groups = aw9523_pmx[sel].groups; > 170 *ngroups = aw9523_pmx[sel].ngrpoups; 171 return 0; 172 } 173 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki