From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8922860DE7; Fri, 22 Mar 2024 17:58:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.16 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711130319; cv=none; b=N3TGhSRoWzYkjrH7U0KfGlC0YpRJhK4qk1fiCFC1/L3Sz8TuPVyH1ml7k3CJnfTj5yAE1RTRCroS3GiRU4glTEnMstd12SH6HZ3X5KICNU9QyhbAYVk5UfpjQrvW25JjRl3GHApcJyODYRQ/pdLegpd4QgbBDQqx7jWR3YZH46c= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711130319; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Fg2DTIIIhUQNFpW2Iw3rokXpLJlP9QgdMt0GMxWljz4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Pch37pcZD3OUkEPikFQCTMl/gBFIq4anY4m79sJ4pgacNjnWj0LKOdnYIsrEL9Iq1Ak5m2dXfLtwi/CjiYobGlBnMyzy46tFvs6X5pQQORjXSwSQwRolu7LHVil0zn++brJbDGf45Qe9aD2BIWwEITW0IUeCtVYZH7mw2U8IeCQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=ek39tlHb; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.16 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="ek39tlHb" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1711130317; x=1742666317; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=Fg2DTIIIhUQNFpW2Iw3rokXpLJlP9QgdMt0GMxWljz4=; b=ek39tlHbe26aMIDREYKIeDgNvXGTPg7L3B9pWojODgDRisNRGSlq51mc ks0lo5owd6TrWjOf0rT/dX68yOUU0K/jIFJD8yf+Ni2NT80kzqQppC3DC GA7BlJFaxCi3yOxCUXBQzt5oanX9Uwz1Y8c8figcEhNfewhXuL49DaB2d m36gr8NVQXglZGiK5hYRFgtlo8RNo7PLIRqz5qNDy9eKSrD53r3vgqJYW RR5vXrZw0m8ndvL68ecyX54/Gi8ATk6nIYk2mraeQ4nkST9tFXYWglZsi wB5Vax2EEGVD6UN41JctHUuICe/++S+8ediwxxbxPrCVeY0Ung1fH/86A g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11020"; a="6308430" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,146,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="6308430" Received: from fmviesa003.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.143]) by orvoesa108.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Mar 2024 10:58:37 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,146,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="19551738" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO b21307750695) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmviesa003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 22 Mar 2024 10:58:33 -0700 Received: from kbuild by b21307750695 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1rnj9y-000KVr-2a; Fri, 22 Mar 2024 17:58:30 +0000 Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2024 01:58:17 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Alex Bee , Lee Jones , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Heiko Stuebner , Linus Walleij , Liam Girdwood , Mark Brown Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Chris Zhong , Zhang Qing , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, Alex Bee Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] mfd: rk8xx: Add RK816 support Message-ID: <202403230131.AhHTZiEx-lkp@intel.com> References: <20240321143911.90210-5-knaerzche@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240321143911.90210-5-knaerzche@gmail.com> Hi Alex, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on lee-mfd/for-mfd-next] [also build test WARNING on lee-mfd/for-mfd-fixes broonie-regulator/for-next robh/for-next linus/master v6.8 next-20240322] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Alex-Bee/dt-bindings-mfd-Add-rk816-binding/20240321-224318 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lee/mfd.git for-mfd-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240321143911.90210-5-knaerzche%40gmail.com patch subject: [PATCH 2/5] mfd: rk8xx: Add RK816 support config: i386-randconfig-062-20240322 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240323/202403230131.AhHTZiEx-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240323/202403230131.AhHTZiEx-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202403230131.AhHTZiEx-lkp@intel.com/ sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) >> drivers/mfd/rk8xx-core.c:573:24: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different modifiers) @@ expected unsigned int ( *get_irq_reg )( ... ) @@ got unsigned int ( const * )( ... ) @@ drivers/mfd/rk8xx-core.c:573:24: sparse: expected unsigned int ( *get_irq_reg )( ... ) drivers/mfd/rk8xx-core.c:573:24: sparse: got unsigned int ( const * )( ... ) vim +573 drivers/mfd/rk8xx-core.c 567 568 static const struct regmap_irq_chip rk816_irq_chip = { 569 .name = "rk816", 570 .irqs = rk816_irqs, 571 .num_irqs = ARRAY_SIZE(rk816_irqs), 572 .num_regs = 3, > 573 .get_irq_reg = rk816_get_irq_reg, 574 .status_base = RK816_INT_STS_REG1, 575 .mask_base = RK816_INT_STS_MSK_REG1, 576 .ack_base = RK816_INT_STS_REG1, 577 .init_ack_masked = true, 578 }; 579 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki