From: "Marek Behún" <kabel@kernel.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>
Cc: "Gregory CLEMENT" <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>,
"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
soc@kernel.org, arm@kernel.org,
"Hans de Goede" <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
"Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>,
"Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
"Bartosz Golaszewski" <brgl@bgdev.pl>,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 3/9] platform: cznic: turris-omnia-mcu: Add support for MCU connected GPIOs
Date: Fri, 10 May 2024 10:09:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240510100946.270c00e3@dellmb> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZjtfCjAlDMMndRfv@smile.fi.intel.com>
On Wed, 8 May 2024 14:16:26 +0300
Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Wed, May 08, 2024 at 12:31:12PM +0200, Marek Behún wrote:
...
> > +static int omnia_ctl_cmd_locked(struct omnia_mcu *mcu, u8 cmd, u16 val,
> > + u16 mask)
>
> Can be one line as it's only 81 characters long.
OK
> > + if (type & IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING)
> > + mcu->rising |= bit;
> > + else
> > + mcu->rising &= ~bit;
> > +
> > + if (type & IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING)
> > + mcu->falling |= bit;
> > + else
> > + mcu->falling &= ~bit;
>
> If those variables was defined as unsigned long, these can be just
>
> __assign_bit()
> __assign_bit()
>
> And other non-atomic bitops elsewhere, like __clear_bit().
Changing this propagated to many other variables and even required
some refactoring of the omnia_gpio structure, since the bit, ctl_bit
and int_bit members are stored as a masks, but __assign_bit() /
__set_bit() / __clear_bit() requires bit numbers.
For example
if (gpio->int_bit && (mcu->is_cached & gpio->int_bit))
return !!(mcu->cached & gpio->int_bit);
needed to change to
if (gpio->has_int && (mcu->is_cached & BIT(gpio->int_bit)))
return !!(mcu->cached & BIT(gpio->int_bit));
and so on.
Moreover, I agree that the if-else statement which you commented on,
when changed to __assign_bit(), looks much nicer, but some changes that
sprouted from this are in my opinion less readable.
I have prepared the fixup patch, but I am not confident enough that
everything is done correctly. I would prefer leaving this one for
later, if it is okay with you.
> > + * Feel free to remove this function and its inverse, omnia_mask_deinterleave,
> > + * and use an appropriate bitmap_* function once such a function exists.
>
> bitmap_*()
OK
...
> > +static int omnia_read_status_word_old_fw(struct omnia_mcu *mcu, u16 *status)
> > +{
> > + int err;
> > +
> > + err = omnia_cmd_read_u16(mcu->client, OMNIA_CMD_GET_STATUS_WORD,
> > + status);
> > + if (!err)
>
> Why not traditional pattern?
>
> if (err)
> return err;
OK, also for the rest similar.
...
> > +static bool omnia_irq_read_pending(struct omnia_mcu *mcu,
> > + unsigned long *pending)
> > +{
> > + if (mcu->features & OMNIA_FEAT_NEW_INT_API)
> > + return omnia_irq_read_pending_new(mcu, pending);
> > + else
>
> 'else' is redundant, but it can be still used for indentation purposes here.
As you say, for indentation purposes I would prefer keeping it this way.
>
> > + return omnia_irq_read_pending_old(mcu, pending);
> > +}
>
> ...
>
> > +static struct attribute *omnia_mcu_gpio_attrs[] = {
> > + &dev_attr_front_button_mode.attr,
> > + NULL
> > +};
> > +
> > +const struct attribute_group omnia_mcu_gpio_group = {
> > + .attrs = omnia_mcu_gpio_attrs,
> > +};
>
> Haven't seen the rest, but here perhaps ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS().
Those define the variable as static, but I need to access it from
turris-omnia-mcu-base.c compilation unit.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-10 8:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-08 10:31 [PATCH v9 0/9] Turris Omnia MCU driver Marek Behún
2024-05-08 10:31 ` [PATCH v9 2/9] platform: cznic: Add preliminary support for Turris Omnia MCU Marek Behún
2024-05-08 10:58 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-05-08 11:07 ` Marek Behún
2024-05-08 10:31 ` [PATCH v9 3/9] platform: cznic: turris-omnia-mcu: Add support for MCU connected GPIOs Marek Behún
2024-05-08 11:16 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-05-10 8:09 ` Marek Behún [this message]
2024-05-10 13:34 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-05-08 11:17 ` [PATCH v9 0/9] Turris Omnia MCU driver Andy Shevchenko
2024-05-08 17:50 ` Marek Behún
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240510100946.270c00e3@dellmb \
--to=kabel@kernel.org \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=arm@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
--cc=gregory.clement@bootlin.com \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=soc@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).