From: Kent Gibson <warthog618@gmail.com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [libgpiod][RFC] helper functions for basic use cases
Date: Fri, 17 May 2024 20:37:32 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240517123732.GA423787@rigel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMRc=Me9ffciaXnOKE+ABLDBVbSRzTAEHRVzpLk641eocF4q8g@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 12:53:36PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 4:14 PM Kent Gibson <warthog618@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 06:54:15AM -0700, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > >
> > > I think the code should go into ext/, the gpiod-ext.h header can go right next
> > > to gpiod.h in include/ and the examples can be in the same examples/ directory,
> > > just call them something_something_ext.c to indicate they use the simpler API.
> > >
> > > Does that sound right?
> > >
> >
> > At the moment I've made the code a conditionally compiled block in
> > line-request.c, so it can directly use the line-request internals.
> > Pretty sure that can be changed to use the core API, but isn't pimpl within
> > the library itself a tad extreme?
>
> I have a strong preference for that code to live in a separate .so
> file (and by extension - a separate compilation unit).
>
Oh, I agree - that makes total sense. The direction I was headed felt wrong,
so I figured I must've misunderstood what you meant.
I'll re-organise it into a separate unit.
Does that unit have to act through the core API, or can we give it
access to the internals?
And where do you stand wrt the idea of adding a config pointer to struct
gpiod_line_request itself?
Cheers,
Kent.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-17 12:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-07 2:21 [libgpiod][RFC] helper functions for basic use cases Kent Gibson
2024-05-10 18:37 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-05-11 1:11 ` Kent Gibson
2024-05-13 8:28 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-05-13 10:13 ` Kent Gibson
2024-05-14 13:31 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-05-14 13:38 ` Kent Gibson
2024-05-15 8:26 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-05-15 9:18 ` Kent Gibson
2024-05-15 13:37 ` Kent Gibson
2024-05-15 13:54 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-05-15 14:14 ` Kent Gibson
2024-05-16 0:19 ` Kent Gibson
2024-05-16 13:55 ` Kent Gibson
2024-05-17 10:53 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-05-17 12:37 ` Kent Gibson [this message]
2024-05-22 10:59 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-05-22 12:41 ` Kent Gibson
2024-05-24 14:20 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-05-15 7:06 ` Martin Hundebøll
2024-05-15 9:32 ` Kent Gibson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240517123732.GA423787@rigel \
--to=warthog618@gmail.com \
--cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).