Re: [libgpiod][PATCH 0/8] tools: tests: fix shellcheck warnings

[Kent Gibson <warthog618@gmail.com>]

On Mon, Jun 03, 2024 at 06:43:08PM +0800, Kent Gibson wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 03, 2024 at 12:40:37PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 3:45 PM Kent Gibson <warthog618@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Following up on recent discussions, this series fixes all the warnings
> > > detected by shellcheck.  The resulting tools test script is now clean,
> > > at least from the perspective of shellcheck.
> > >
> > > These fixes do not correct any known issue, other than shellcheck
> > > reporting them as potential problems, the intent is to remove common
> > > shell issues that may impact future changes, and to simplify checking
> > > that any subsequent changes to the test script constitute "good" shell.
> > >
> > > All the patches other than Patch 8 address a particular warning.
> > > They are reasonably self-explanatory, but each commit comment includes a
> > > link to the relevant warning(s) which describes the issue and the
> > > appropriate corrections.
> > >
> > > Patch 8 addresses a number of warnings, all related to word splitting
> > > and globbing, and those constitute the bulk of the changes.
> > > Some of the earlier patches also address trivial splitting/globbing
> > > issues where that would prevent a line being modified multiple times.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Kent.
> > >
> > > Kent Gibson (8):
> > >   tools: tests: don't mix string and array
> > >   tools: tests: don't declare and assign separately
> > >   tools: tests: fix unused variables
> > >   tools: tests: use read -r to avoid mangling backslashes
> > >   tools: tests: don't use variables in printf format string
> > >   tools: tests: check exit code directly
> > >   tools: tests: shellcheck don't follow sourced file
> > >   tools: tests: avoid splitting and globbing
> > >
> > >  tools/gpio-tools-test.bash | 459 +++++++++++++++++++------------------
> > >  1 file changed, 234 insertions(+), 225 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > --
> > > 2.39.2
> > >
> >
> > Ugh, you added links after the SoB and it messes up with b4. Can you
> > resend it with links before any tags? Or better yet: make [x] into
> > Link: [x] so that b4 can interpret it correctly?
> >
>
> hehe, yeah I wondered about that after I'd sent it.
> I'll fix for v2.
>

Can I confirm this is the format you want:

    Link: [1] https://www.shellcheck.net/wiki/SC2145

cos that makes checkpatch.pl unhappy.

Thanks,
Kent.