linux-gpio.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kent Gibson <warthog618@gmail.com>
To: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, brgl@bgdev.pl
Cc: Kent Gibson <warthog618@gmail.com>
Subject: [libgpiod][PATCH 3/3] bindings: python: tests: add coverage of kernel reconfigure as-is behaviour
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 13:38:08 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240626053808.179457-4-warthog618@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240626053808.179457-1-warthog618@gmail.com>

The kernel's handling of reconfigure with default values, as is the
case for providing a None value as the settings to the Python bindings'
reconfigure_lines(), resets any flags set to non-default values when the
line is requested to their default values.  While the flags are cleared,
the kernel makes no corresponding change to the electrical settings -
though subsequent calls to get and set values will apply the updated
flags.

The tests for missing or None settings are extended to demonstrate the
issue for active_low and drive flags, though the issue applies to all
flags.

The tests fail unless the kernel is patched to ignore reconfiguration
of lines without direction set.

Signed-off-by: Kent Gibson <warthog618@gmail.com>
---
 bindings/python/tests/tests_line_request.py | 14 ++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/bindings/python/tests/tests_line_request.py b/bindings/python/tests/tests_line_request.py
index 2f375d6..79167f1 100644
--- a/bindings/python/tests/tests_line_request.py
+++ b/bindings/python/tests/tests_line_request.py
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ import errno
 import gpiod
 
 from . import gpiosim
-from gpiod.line import Direction, Edge, Value
+from gpiod.line import Direction, Drive, Edge, Value
 from unittest import TestCase
 
 Pull = gpiosim.Chip.Pull
@@ -462,7 +462,9 @@ class ReconfigureRequestedLines(TestCase):
         self.sim = gpiosim.Chip(num_lines=8, line_names={3: "foo", 4: "bar", 6: "baz"})
         self.chip = gpiod.Chip(self.sim.dev_path)
         self.req = self.chip.request_lines(
-            {(0, 2, "foo", "baz"): gpiod.LineSettings(direction=Direction.OUTPUT)}
+            {(0, 2, "foo", "baz"): gpiod.LineSettings(direction=Direction.OUTPUT,
+                                                      active_low=True,
+                                                      drive=Drive.OPEN_DRAIN)}
         )
 
     def tearDown(self):
@@ -511,6 +513,8 @@ class ReconfigureRequestedLines(TestCase):
     def test_reconfigure_with_default(self):
         info = self.chip.get_line_info(2)
         self.assertEqual(info.direction, Direction.OUTPUT)
+        self.assertTrue(info.active_low)
+        self.assertEqual(info.drive, Drive.OPEN_DRAIN)
         self.req.reconfigure_lines({
             0: gpiod.LineSettings(direction=Direction.INPUT),
             2: None,
@@ -520,10 +524,14 @@ class ReconfigureRequestedLines(TestCase):
         self.assertEqual(info.direction, Direction.INPUT)
         info = self.chip.get_line_info(2)
         self.assertEqual(info.direction, Direction.OUTPUT)
+        self.assertTrue(info.active_low)
+        self.assertEqual(info.drive, Drive.OPEN_DRAIN)
 
     def test_reconfigure_missing_offsets(self):
         info = self.chip.get_line_info(2)
         self.assertEqual(info.direction, Direction.OUTPUT)
+        self.assertTrue(info.active_low)
+        self.assertEqual(info.drive, Drive.OPEN_DRAIN)
         self.req.reconfigure_lines(
                 {(6, 0): gpiod.LineSettings(direction=Direction.INPUT)}
             )
@@ -531,6 +539,8 @@ class ReconfigureRequestedLines(TestCase):
         self.assertEqual(info.direction, Direction.INPUT)
         info = self.chip.get_line_info(2)
         self.assertEqual(info.direction, Direction.OUTPUT)
+        self.assertTrue(info.active_low)
+        self.assertEqual(info.drive, Drive.OPEN_DRAIN)
 
     def test_reconfigure_extra_offsets(self):
         info = self.chip.get_line_info(2)
-- 
2.39.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-06-26  5:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-26  5:38 [libgpiod][PATCH 0/3] bindings: python: more flexible reconfigure_lines() Kent Gibson
2024-06-26  5:38 ` [libgpiod][PATCH 1/3] bindings: python: tests: extend reconfiguration tests Kent Gibson
2024-06-26  5:38 ` [libgpiod][PATCH 2/3] bindings: python: more flexible reconfigure_lines() Kent Gibson
2024-06-26  5:38 ` Kent Gibson [this message]
2024-06-27 15:06   ` [libgpiod][PATCH 3/3] bindings: python: tests: add coverage of kernel reconfigure as-is behaviour Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-06-27 15:20     ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-06-28  1:26       ` Kent Gibson
2024-07-05  7:34 ` [libgpiod][PATCH 0/3] bindings: python: more flexible reconfigure_lines() Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-07-06  2:35   ` Kent Gibson
2024-07-08  9:54 ` Bartosz Golaszewski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240626053808.179457-4-warthog618@gmail.com \
    --to=warthog618@gmail.com \
    --cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).