From: Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>,
Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] gpio: free irqs that are still requested when the chip is being removed
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 15:00:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240923150036.1ede7ca6@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240919135104.3583-1-brgl@bgdev.pl>
Hi Bartosz,
On Thu, 19 Sep 2024 15:51:04 +0200
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> wrote:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
>
> If we remove a GPIO chip that is also an interrupt controller with users
> not having freed some interrupts, we'll end up leaking resources as
> indicated by the following warning:
>
> remove_proc_entry: removing non-empty directory 'irq/30', leaking at least 'gpio'
>
> As there's no way of notifying interrupt users about the irqchip going
> away and the interrupt subsystem is not plugged into the driver model and
> so not all cases can be handled by devlinks, we need to make sure to free
> all interrupts before the complete the removal of the provider.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
> ---
> v1 -> v2:
> - we should actually take the request_mutex to protect the irqaction from being
> freed while we dereference it and keep the actual dereferencing under the lock
> - add some comments to explain what we're doing
>
> drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+)
Thanks for the patch.
Tested on my system and it fixes the issue.
Reviewed-by: Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>
Tested-by: Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>
My old series [1] related to the topic is no more needed and can be thrown
away.
Best regards,
Hervé
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240227113426.253232-1-herve.codina@bootlin.com/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-23 13:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-19 13:51 [PATCH v2] gpio: free irqs that are still requested when the chip is being removed Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-09-23 13:00 ` Herve Codina [this message]
2024-09-30 8:22 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-10-02 13:14 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240923150036.1ede7ca6@bootlin.com \
--to=herve.codina@bootlin.com \
--cc=bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org \
--cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).