From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D87E519ABD1; Fri, 11 Oct 2024 16:56:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1728665813; cv=none; b=XXl8t999c2NJn/EE6Y2bQPQ/v1YQYNm+BUpZLHcwuRRsv22onuT5O/9t7hbCkLhJ8LjXHD2/i6D4QBs70RIE3UH/cjxNhiqbIXXgQ9bc19Zt+SImnUWB/KSHmkWf7dMaLb5/9WetMQ+xXASyTRZplLg9OnwMqw4jDCu7utvfUEU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1728665813; c=relaxed/simple; bh=iEtHdpYrx5DVc2mfDpmhMV08XV93wcIaiwU6NFEPxW4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=KTMmDiqzRH6g1MJKBr8iayC9I4wwvv9rd6k3mpXOG8Eu3iBJj4km8WWWpVsfHqMLopr9+PzmFiMvMJsgebwLJRR4+Kbs0JaGn09EYWh4+ZDetXe0wag61SYzTCOSNkWhbKSjEEd/astHPKbDKS6U7HUTI8zUi1Xlu6QTFmCDpL4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=GiMSdH2X; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="GiMSdH2X" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B3401C4CEC7; Fri, 11 Oct 2024 16:56:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1728665812; bh=iEtHdpYrx5DVc2mfDpmhMV08XV93wcIaiwU6NFEPxW4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=GiMSdH2XoZ78kFCXCjt+1Bk9hEjlDpJ18YZd+qDVSlFtwTMWBBvles8ylKqTJ5smK vN8q3gQl06Nyr8Qblp6EeyNJvZ05rq7JpZnTrlOy7dP4Xz/w/EPeAZw1KBTegYAlMv verH1sjYtMaec26n7LYex0T8DBI0oNtVTgqAUBCL8d6UH5D9ysKzq+yBhV+9ppnGTM TBF1VQOAKhMLqcoCxMJFgHw5C7zxDYveMGo+29CyeIaAmJu5HOGHsgavO1/OXHnCfs kMUkGUbal+tatSdQir+hrWSHwrIstTvYWjoMAahOlg5CAdyih8Mcyy+JGojVlonHxI 0H4Fp0Tbr3POg== Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 11:56:40 -0500 From: Rob Herring To: Yassine Oudjana Cc: Sean Wang , Linus Walleij , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Matthias Brugger , AngeloGioacchino Del Regno , Yassine Oudjana , Andy Teng , linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/8] dt-bindings: pinctrl: mediatek,mt6779-pinctrl: Pull pinctrl node changes from MT6795 document Message-ID: <20241011165640.GA2475122-robh@kernel.org> References: <20241011120520.140318-1-y.oudjana@protonmail.com> <20241011120520.140318-2-y.oudjana@protonmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20241011120520.140318-2-y.oudjana@protonmail.com> On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 03:03:46PM +0300, Yassine Oudjana wrote: > From: Yassine Oudjana > > mediatek,pinctrl-mt6795.yaml has different node name patterns which match > bindings of other MediaTek pin controllers, ref for pinmux-node.yaml which > has a description of the pinmux property, as well as some additional > descriptions for some pin configuration properties. Pull those changes > into mediatek,mt6779-pinctrl.yaml and adjust the example DTS to match in > preparation to combine the MT6795 document into it. > > Signed-off-by: Yassine Oudjana > --- > .../pinctrl/mediatek,mt6779-pinctrl.yaml | 38 ++++++++++++++----- > 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt6779-pinctrl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt6779-pinctrl.yaml > index 3bbc00df5548d..352a88d7b135e 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt6779-pinctrl.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt6779-pinctrl.yaml > @@ -111,12 +111,12 @@ allOf: > - "#interrupt-cells" > > patternProperties: > - '-[0-9]*$': > + '-pins$': Worst case, this could be an ABI break. Best case, it's churn for mt6779. Is it worth unifying? Rob