From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BA5618801F; Fri, 18 Oct 2024 20:39:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.15 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729283947; cv=none; b=YXwVarFbG24qmJFPLjk3ffnMB86e3po0WjmZ5UpR0t+nSApCxBOz6VnunkXTR5eVA0iXu+g0EKoxke4JeDXbbcDTyLCRUZndoIm21/8bCJKthu/herIff4bu8j6UyH0XbB9xJzfo8BNXCnbVc/pxXhTKn7G+lh+JIeOZj9ZiDOA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729283947; c=relaxed/simple; bh=UFgY7nQ/+9Kk9FAvomP/z0BzB/J5FmyIv+Qtu5xS03g=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=tko4zFAGDMwDyhE5t9Uuc5sT1W8uVBgzhvjkbyIE0Z9HXDsMHggJZUe/rCIAYXI96xy2wKJncax9E7Yhs2PD2CMRfo3dqtqVBhyKQDnXGgxnV5m5oyw35U20/Tjurs8vZuAixZRv0PWu35t1HeKkpHKanHaKHu78FUyHLdLJs54= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=Ga4kn+CN; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.15 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="Ga4kn+CN" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1729283946; x=1760819946; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=UFgY7nQ/+9Kk9FAvomP/z0BzB/J5FmyIv+Qtu5xS03g=; b=Ga4kn+CNWq49SAIVIA4wcapxm8Vsj+41BFYuq9bKZ3iOh1MsHFt4xFYO 6LNiO8F7j/YRfXq8KhH2XzhqsTySh/zHCsAngyXj1Z768lFCnI7JjJ5Ba 98iIUFdFXSM3NR/YdOvOysNdtPwMxa+b0kJIJ4kFxYSrD8AZT3XGRR0kD EgDWwN2y8Q8qv7AhUFcoTVB5I6li3SJ3AYSWwIlORb4Wlm4QVf0HO0Pjb 81SohH223t6bU0ZRIgbI7a2HatHcC/W4QGQRhZvsdrDRWtQM+ZCg6m3cF 3Qe1CJ7DLtCyoYtDL/LFLL0GSH2S+Lb+383SGGrxYrqM6f1nHyt8q2NFq g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: /H5wU2VTT3mi/GERzY4zMw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: O+IVOup9Q3ulmRK/oTXeAw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11222"; a="32515118" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.11,199,1725346800"; d="scan'208";a="32515118" Received: from orviesa002.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.142]) by orvoesa107.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 18 Oct 2024 13:39:05 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: rAB6xkV6RViK06qQGjQlrg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: XZBQz+AGRmuplNxQnYCQxw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.11,214,1725346800"; d="scan'208";a="109796431" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO a48cf1aa22e8) ([10.239.97.150]) by orviesa002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 18 Oct 2024 13:39:02 -0700 Received: from kbuild by a48cf1aa22e8 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1t1tkR-000OI1-11; Fri, 18 Oct 2024 20:38:59 +0000 Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2024 04:38:28 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Prabhakar , Linus Walleij , Geert Uytterhoeven , Magnus Damm , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, Prabhakar , Biju Das , Fabrizio Castro , Lad Prabhakar Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] pinctrl: pinmux: Introduce API to check if a pin is requested Message-ID: <202410190448.yDDAKyxt-lkp@intel.com> References: <20241017113942.139712-7-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20241017113942.139712-7-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> Hi Prabhakar, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on geert-renesas-drivers/renesas-pinctrl] [also build test WARNING on linusw-pinctrl/devel linusw-pinctrl/for-next geert-renesas-devel/next linus/master v6.12-rc3 next-20241018] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Prabhakar/arm64-dts-renesas-rzg3s-smarc-Drop-hogging-of-GPIO-pins/20241017-194200 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/geert/renesas-drivers.git renesas-pinctrl patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241017113942.139712-7-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj%40bp.renesas.com patch subject: [PATCH 6/7] pinctrl: pinmux: Introduce API to check if a pin is requested config: arm-pxa3xx_defconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241019/202410190448.yDDAKyxt-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc (GCC) 13.3.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241019/202410190448.yDDAKyxt-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202410190448.yDDAKyxt-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from drivers/pinctrl/core.c:38: >> drivers/pinctrl/pinmux.h:104:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'pin_requested' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 104 | bool pin_requested(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, int pin) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ vim +/pin_requested +104 drivers/pinctrl/pinmux.h 103 > 104 bool pin_requested(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, int pin) 105 { 106 return false; 107 } 108 #endif 109 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki