From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
To: "Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
"Bartosz Golaszewski" <brgl@bgdev.pl>,
"Michael Walle" <mwalle@kernel.org>,
"Bamvor Jian Zhang" <bamv2005@gmail.com>,
"Geert Uytterhoeven" <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>,
"Uwe Kleine-König" <ukleinek@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 03/14] gpiolib: rework the wrapper around gpio_chip::set_multiple()
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 13:09:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250211-gpio-set-retval-v1-3-52d3d613d7d3@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250211-gpio-set-retval-v1-0-52d3d613d7d3@linaro.org>
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Make the existing wrapper around gpio_chip::set_multiple() consistent
with the one for gpio_chip::set(): make it return int, add a lockdep
assertion, warn on missing set callback and move the code a bit for
better readability.
Add return value checks in all call places.
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
---
drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
index 7826bfb72104..1f078a20ce3d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
@@ -3468,19 +3468,32 @@ static int gpiod_set_raw_value_commit(struct gpio_desc *desc, bool value)
* defines which outputs are to be changed
* @bits: bit value array; one bit per output; BITS_PER_LONG bits per word
* defines the values the outputs specified by mask are to be set to
+ *
+ * Returns: 0 on success, negative error number on failure.
*/
-static void gpio_chip_set_multiple(struct gpio_chip *gc,
- unsigned long *mask, unsigned long *bits)
+static int gpiochip_set_multiple(struct gpio_chip *gc,
+ unsigned long *mask, unsigned long *bits)
{
+ unsigned int i;
+
+ lockdep_assert_held(&gc->gpiodev->srcu);
+
+ if (WARN_ON(unlikely(!gc->set_multiple && !gc->set)))
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
if (gc->set_multiple) {
gc->set_multiple(gc, mask, bits);
- } else {
- unsigned int i;
-
- /* set outputs if the corresponding mask bit is set */
- for_each_set_bit(i, mask, gc->ngpio)
- gpiochip_set(gc, i, test_bit(i, bits));
+ return 0;
}
+
+ /* set outputs if the corresponding mask bit is set */
+ for_each_set_bit(i, mask, gc->ngpio) {
+ ret = gpiochip_set(gc, i, test_bit(i, bits));
+ if (ret)
+ break;
+ }
+
+ return ret;
}
int gpiod_set_array_value_complex(bool raw, bool can_sleep,
@@ -3489,7 +3502,7 @@ int gpiod_set_array_value_complex(bool raw, bool can_sleep,
struct gpio_array *array_info,
unsigned long *value_bitmap)
{
- int i = 0;
+ int i = 0, ret;
/*
* Validate array_info against desc_array and its size.
@@ -3506,8 +3519,11 @@ int gpiod_set_array_value_complex(bool raw, bool can_sleep,
bitmap_xor(value_bitmap, value_bitmap,
array_info->invert_mask, array_size);
- gpio_chip_set_multiple(array_info->chip, array_info->set_mask,
- value_bitmap);
+ ret = gpiochip_set_multiple(array_info->chip,
+ array_info->set_mask,
+ value_bitmap);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
i = find_first_zero_bit(array_info->set_mask, array_size);
if (i == array_size)
@@ -3584,8 +3600,11 @@ int gpiod_set_array_value_complex(bool raw, bool can_sleep,
} while ((i < array_size) &&
gpio_device_chip_cmp(desc_array[i]->gdev, guard.gc));
/* push collected bits to outputs */
- if (count != 0)
- gpio_chip_set_multiple(guard.gc, mask, bits);
+ if (count != 0) {
+ ret = gpiochip_set_multiple(guard.gc, mask, bits);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ }
if (mask != fastpath_mask)
bitmap_free(mask);
--
2.45.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-11 12:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-11 12:09 [PATCH 00/14] gpiolib: indicate errors in value setters Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-02-11 12:09 ` [PATCH 01/14] gpiolib: make value setters have return values Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-02-12 8:03 ` kernel test robot
2025-02-12 13:26 ` kernel test robot
2025-02-12 13:57 ` kernel test robot
2025-02-14 9:24 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-02-11 12:09 ` [PATCH 02/14] gpiolib: wrap gpio_chip::set() Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-02-11 12:09 ` Bartosz Golaszewski [this message]
2025-02-11 12:09 ` [PATCH 04/14] gpiolib: introduce gpio_chip setters that return values Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-02-11 12:09 ` [PATCH 05/14] gpio: sim: use value returning setters Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-02-11 12:09 ` [PATCH 06/14] gpio: regmap: " Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-02-17 7:49 ` Michael Walle
2025-02-11 12:09 ` [PATCH 07/14] gpio: pca953x: " Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-02-11 12:09 ` [PATCH 08/14] gpio: mockup: " Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-02-11 12:09 ` [PATCH 09/14] gpio: aggregator: " Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-02-11 12:09 ` [PATCH 10/14] gpio: max77650: " Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-02-11 12:09 ` [PATCH 11/14] gpio: latch: use lock guards Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-02-11 12:09 ` [PATCH 12/14] gpio: latch: use value returning setters Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-02-11 12:09 ` [PATCH 13/14] gpio: davinci: " Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-02-11 12:09 ` [PATCH 14/14] gpio: mvebu: " Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-02-14 9:56 ` [PATCH 00/14] gpiolib: indicate errors in value setters Linus Walleij
2025-02-14 10:14 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250211-gpio-set-retval-v1-3-52d3d613d7d3@linaro.org \
--to=brgl@bgdev.pl \
--cc=bamv2005@gmail.com \
--cc=bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=j-keerthy@ti.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mwalle@kernel.org \
--cc=ukleinek@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).