From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
To: "Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
"Bartosz Golaszewski" <brgl@bgdev.pl>,
"Michael Walle" <mwalle@kernel.org>,
"Bamvor Jian Zhang" <bamv2005@gmail.com>,
"Geert Uytterhoeven" <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>,
"Uwe Kleine-König" <ukleinek@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 09/14] gpio: aggregator: use value returning setters
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 13:09:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250211-gpio-set-retval-v1-9-52d3d613d7d3@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250211-gpio-set-retval-v1-0-52d3d613d7d3@linaro.org>
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
struct gpio_chip now has additional variants of the set(_multiple)
driver callbacks that return an integer to indicate success or failure.
Convert the driver to using them.
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
---
drivers/gpio/gpio-aggregator.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-aggregator.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-aggregator.c
index 65f41cc3eafc..e799599a06a1 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-aggregator.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-aggregator.c
@@ -358,25 +358,30 @@ static void gpio_fwd_delay(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset, int valu
udelay(delay_us);
}
-static void gpio_fwd_set(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset, int value)
+static int gpio_fwd_set(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset, int value)
{
struct gpiochip_fwd *fwd = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
+ int ret;
if (chip->can_sleep)
- gpiod_set_value_cansleep(fwd->descs[offset], value);
+ ret = gpiod_set_value_cansleep(fwd->descs[offset], value);
else
- gpiod_set_value(fwd->descs[offset], value);
+ ret = gpiod_set_value(fwd->descs[offset], value);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
if (fwd->delay_timings)
gpio_fwd_delay(chip, offset, value);
+
+ return ret;
}
-static void gpio_fwd_set_multiple(struct gpiochip_fwd *fwd, unsigned long *mask,
- unsigned long *bits)
+static int gpio_fwd_set_multiple(struct gpiochip_fwd *fwd, unsigned long *mask,
+ unsigned long *bits)
{
struct gpio_desc **descs = fwd_tmp_descs(fwd);
unsigned long *values = fwd_tmp_values(fwd);
- unsigned int i, j = 0;
+ unsigned int i, j = 0, ret;
for_each_set_bit(i, mask, fwd->chip.ngpio) {
__assign_bit(j, values, test_bit(i, bits));
@@ -384,26 +389,31 @@ static void gpio_fwd_set_multiple(struct gpiochip_fwd *fwd, unsigned long *mask,
}
if (fwd->chip.can_sleep)
- gpiod_set_array_value_cansleep(j, descs, NULL, values);
+ ret = gpiod_set_array_value_cansleep(j, descs, NULL, values);
else
- gpiod_set_array_value(j, descs, NULL, values);
+ ret = gpiod_set_array_value(j, descs, NULL, values);
+
+ return ret;
}
-static void gpio_fwd_set_multiple_locked(struct gpio_chip *chip,
- unsigned long *mask, unsigned long *bits)
+static int gpio_fwd_set_multiple_locked(struct gpio_chip *chip,
+ unsigned long *mask, unsigned long *bits)
{
struct gpiochip_fwd *fwd = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
unsigned long flags;
+ int ret;
if (chip->can_sleep) {
mutex_lock(&fwd->mlock);
- gpio_fwd_set_multiple(fwd, mask, bits);
+ ret = gpio_fwd_set_multiple(fwd, mask, bits);
mutex_unlock(&fwd->mlock);
} else {
spin_lock_irqsave(&fwd->slock, flags);
- gpio_fwd_set_multiple(fwd, mask, bits);
+ ret = gpio_fwd_set_multiple(fwd, mask, bits);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fwd->slock, flags);
}
+
+ return ret;
}
static int gpio_fwd_set_config(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset,
@@ -533,8 +543,8 @@ static struct gpiochip_fwd *gpiochip_fwd_create(struct device *dev,
chip->direction_output = gpio_fwd_direction_output;
chip->get = gpio_fwd_get;
chip->get_multiple = gpio_fwd_get_multiple_locked;
- chip->set = gpio_fwd_set;
- chip->set_multiple = gpio_fwd_set_multiple_locked;
+ chip->set_rv = gpio_fwd_set;
+ chip->set_multiple_rv = gpio_fwd_set_multiple_locked;
chip->to_irq = gpio_fwd_to_irq;
chip->base = -1;
chip->ngpio = ngpios;
--
2.45.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-11 12:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-11 12:09 [PATCH 00/14] gpiolib: indicate errors in value setters Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-02-11 12:09 ` [PATCH 01/14] gpiolib: make value setters have return values Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-02-12 8:03 ` kernel test robot
2025-02-12 13:26 ` kernel test robot
2025-02-12 13:57 ` kernel test robot
2025-02-14 9:24 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-02-11 12:09 ` [PATCH 02/14] gpiolib: wrap gpio_chip::set() Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-02-11 12:09 ` [PATCH 03/14] gpiolib: rework the wrapper around gpio_chip::set_multiple() Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-02-11 12:09 ` [PATCH 04/14] gpiolib: introduce gpio_chip setters that return values Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-02-11 12:09 ` [PATCH 05/14] gpio: sim: use value returning setters Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-02-11 12:09 ` [PATCH 06/14] gpio: regmap: " Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-02-17 7:49 ` Michael Walle
2025-02-11 12:09 ` [PATCH 07/14] gpio: pca953x: " Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-02-11 12:09 ` [PATCH 08/14] gpio: mockup: " Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-02-11 12:09 ` Bartosz Golaszewski [this message]
2025-02-11 12:09 ` [PATCH 10/14] gpio: max77650: " Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-02-11 12:09 ` [PATCH 11/14] gpio: latch: use lock guards Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-02-11 12:09 ` [PATCH 12/14] gpio: latch: use value returning setters Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-02-11 12:09 ` [PATCH 13/14] gpio: davinci: " Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-02-11 12:09 ` [PATCH 14/14] gpio: mvebu: " Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-02-14 9:56 ` [PATCH 00/14] gpiolib: indicate errors in value setters Linus Walleij
2025-02-14 10:14 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250211-gpio-set-retval-v1-9-52d3d613d7d3@linaro.org \
--to=brgl@bgdev.pl \
--cc=bamv2005@gmail.com \
--cc=bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=j-keerthy@ti.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mwalle@kernel.org \
--cc=ukleinek@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).