From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
To: "Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
"Bartosz Golaszewski" <brgl@bgdev.pl>,
"Michael Walle" <mwalle@kernel.org>,
"Bamvor Jian Zhang" <bamv2005@gmail.com>,
"Geert Uytterhoeven" <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>,
"Uwe Kleine-König" <ukleinek@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 03/15] gpiolib: wrap gpio_chip::set()
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 10:57:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250220-gpio-set-retval-v2-3-bc4cfd38dae3@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250220-gpio-set-retval-v2-0-bc4cfd38dae3@linaro.org>
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
We have three places where we dereference the gpio_chip::set() callback.
In order to make it easier to incorporate the upcoming new variant of
this callback (one returning an integer value), wrap it in a helper so
that the dereferencing only happens once.
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
---
drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
index 0a47fb38dd61..040b4689eb8e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
@@ -2755,6 +2755,17 @@ int gpiod_direction_input_nonotify(struct gpio_desc *desc)
return ret;
}
+static int gpiochip_set(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset, int value)
+{
+ lockdep_assert_held(&gc->gpiodev->srcu);
+
+ if (WARN_ON(unlikely(!gc->set)))
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
+ gc->set(gc, offset, value);
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int gpiod_direction_output_raw_commit(struct gpio_desc *desc, int value)
{
int val = !!value, ret = 0;
@@ -2797,7 +2808,9 @@ static int gpiod_direction_output_raw_commit(struct gpio_desc *desc, int value)
* If we can't actively set the direction, we are some
* output-only chip, so just drive the output as desired.
*/
- guard.gc->set(guard.gc, gpio_chip_hwgpio(desc), val);
+ ret = gpiochip_set(guard.gc, gpio_chip_hwgpio(desc), val);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
}
if (!ret)
@@ -3465,9 +3478,7 @@ static int gpiod_set_raw_value_commit(struct gpio_desc *desc, bool value)
return -ENODEV;
trace_gpio_value(desc_to_gpio(desc), 0, value);
- guard.gc->set(guard.gc, gpio_chip_hwgpio(desc), value);
-
- return 0;
+ return gpiochip_set(guard.gc, gpio_chip_hwgpio(desc), value);
}
/*
@@ -3492,7 +3503,7 @@ static void gpio_chip_set_multiple(struct gpio_chip *gc,
/* set outputs if the corresponding mask bit is set */
for_each_set_bit(i, mask, gc->ngpio)
- gc->set(gc, i, test_bit(i, bits));
+ gpiochip_set(gc, i, test_bit(i, bits));
}
}
--
2.45.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-20 9:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-20 9:56 [PATCH v2 00/15] gpiolib: indicate errors in value setters Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-02-20 9:56 ` [PATCH v2 01/15] leds: aw200xx: don't use return with gpiod_set_value() variants Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-03-06 22:51 ` (subset) " Lee Jones
2025-03-07 7:03 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-03-13 15:29 ` Lee Jones
2025-02-20 9:56 ` [PATCH v2 02/15] gpiolib: make value setters have return values Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-02-20 9:57 ` Bartosz Golaszewski [this message]
2025-02-20 9:57 ` [PATCH v2 04/15] gpiolib: rework the wrapper around gpio_chip::set_multiple() Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-02-20 9:57 ` [PATCH v2 05/15] gpiolib: introduce gpio_chip setters that return values Bartosz Golaszewski
[not found] ` <CGME20250227140054eucas1p2bf6e3f2416e11e3c62a704682bf052bf@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
2025-02-27 14:00 ` Marek Szyprowski
2025-02-27 14:10 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-02-20 9:57 ` [PATCH v2 06/15] gpio: sim: use value returning setters Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-02-20 9:57 ` [PATCH v2 07/15] gpio: regmap: " Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-02-20 10:08 ` Michael Walle
2025-02-20 9:57 ` [PATCH v2 08/15] gpio: pca953x: " Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-02-20 9:57 ` [PATCH v2 09/15] gpio: mockup: " Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-02-20 9:57 ` [PATCH v2 10/15] gpio: aggregator: " Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-02-20 9:57 ` [PATCH v2 11/15] gpio: max77650: " Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-02-20 9:57 ` [PATCH v2 12/15] gpio: latch: use lock guards Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-02-20 9:57 ` [PATCH v2 13/15] gpio: latch: use value returning setters Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-02-20 9:57 ` [PATCH v2 14/15] gpio: davinci: " Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-02-20 9:57 ` [PATCH v2 15/15] gpio: mvebu: " Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-02-21 9:33 ` [PATCH v2 00/15] gpiolib: indicate errors in value setters Uwe Kleine-König
2025-02-26 10:19 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250220-gpio-set-retval-v2-3-bc4cfd38dae3@linaro.org \
--to=brgl@bgdev.pl \
--cc=bamv2005@gmail.com \
--cc=bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=j-keerthy@ti.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mwalle@kernel.org \
--cc=ukleinek@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).