linux-gpio.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
To: "Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	"Bartosz Golaszewski" <brgl@bgdev.pl>,
	"Michael Walle" <mwalle@kernel.org>,
	"Bamvor Jian Zhang" <bamv2005@gmail.com>,
	"Geert Uytterhoeven" <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
	Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>,
	"Uwe Kleine-König" <ukleinek@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org,
	 Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 04/15] gpiolib: rework the wrapper around gpio_chip::set_multiple()
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 10:57:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250220-gpio-set-retval-v2-4-bc4cfd38dae3@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250220-gpio-set-retval-v2-0-bc4cfd38dae3@linaro.org>

From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>

Make the existing wrapper around gpio_chip::set_multiple() consistent
with the one for gpio_chip::set(): make it return int, add a lockdep
assertion, warn on missing set callback and move the code a bit for
better readability.

Add return value checks in all call places.

Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
index 040b4689eb8e..b1e7d368bc7d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
@@ -3490,21 +3490,33 @@ static int gpiod_set_raw_value_commit(struct gpio_desc *desc, bool value)
  *        defines which outputs are to be changed
  * @bits: bit value array; one bit per output; BITS_PER_LONG bits per word
  *        defines the values the outputs specified by mask are to be set to
+ *
+ * Returns: 0 on success, negative error number on failure.
  */
-static void gpio_chip_set_multiple(struct gpio_chip *gc,
-				   unsigned long *mask, unsigned long *bits)
+static int gpiochip_set_multiple(struct gpio_chip *gc,
+				 unsigned long *mask, unsigned long *bits)
 {
+	unsigned int i;
+	int ret;
+
 	lockdep_assert_held(&gc->gpiodev->srcu);
 
+	if (WARN_ON(unlikely(!gc->set_multiple && !gc->set)))
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
 	if (gc->set_multiple) {
 		gc->set_multiple(gc, mask, bits);
-	} else {
-		unsigned int i;
-
-		/* set outputs if the corresponding mask bit is set */
-		for_each_set_bit(i, mask, gc->ngpio)
-			gpiochip_set(gc, i, test_bit(i, bits));
+		return 0;
 	}
+
+	/* set outputs if the corresponding mask bit is set */
+	for_each_set_bit(i, mask, gc->ngpio) {
+		ret = gpiochip_set(gc, i, test_bit(i, bits));
+		if (ret)
+			break;
+	}
+
+	return ret;
 }
 
 int gpiod_set_array_value_complex(bool raw, bool can_sleep,
@@ -3514,7 +3526,7 @@ int gpiod_set_array_value_complex(bool raw, bool can_sleep,
 				  unsigned long *value_bitmap)
 {
 	struct gpio_chip *gc;
-	int i = 0;
+	int i = 0, ret;
 
 	/*
 	 * Validate array_info against desc_array and its size.
@@ -3537,7 +3549,10 @@ int gpiod_set_array_value_complex(bool raw, bool can_sleep,
 			bitmap_xor(value_bitmap, value_bitmap,
 				   array_info->invert_mask, array_size);
 
-		gpio_chip_set_multiple(gc, array_info->set_mask, value_bitmap);
+		ret = gpiochip_set_multiple(gc, array_info->set_mask,
+					    value_bitmap);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
 
 		i = find_first_zero_bit(array_info->set_mask, array_size);
 		if (i == array_size)
@@ -3614,8 +3629,11 @@ int gpiod_set_array_value_complex(bool raw, bool can_sleep,
 		} while ((i < array_size) &&
 			 gpio_device_chip_cmp(desc_array[i]->gdev, guard.gc));
 		/* push collected bits to outputs */
-		if (count != 0)
-			gpio_chip_set_multiple(guard.gc, mask, bits);
+		if (count != 0) {
+			ret = gpiochip_set_multiple(guard.gc, mask, bits);
+			if (ret)
+				return ret;
+		}
 
 		if (mask != fastpath_mask)
 			bitmap_free(mask);

-- 
2.45.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-02-20  9:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-20  9:56 [PATCH v2 00/15] gpiolib: indicate errors in value setters Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-02-20  9:56 ` [PATCH v2 01/15] leds: aw200xx: don't use return with gpiod_set_value() variants Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-03-06 22:51   ` (subset) " Lee Jones
2025-03-07  7:03     ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-03-13 15:29       ` Lee Jones
2025-02-20  9:56 ` [PATCH v2 02/15] gpiolib: make value setters have return values Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-02-20  9:57 ` [PATCH v2 03/15] gpiolib: wrap gpio_chip::set() Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-02-20  9:57 ` Bartosz Golaszewski [this message]
2025-02-20  9:57 ` [PATCH v2 05/15] gpiolib: introduce gpio_chip setters that return values Bartosz Golaszewski
     [not found]   ` <CGME20250227140054eucas1p2bf6e3f2416e11e3c62a704682bf052bf@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
2025-02-27 14:00     ` Marek Szyprowski
2025-02-27 14:10       ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-02-20  9:57 ` [PATCH v2 06/15] gpio: sim: use value returning setters Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-02-20  9:57 ` [PATCH v2 07/15] gpio: regmap: " Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-02-20 10:08   ` Michael Walle
2025-02-20  9:57 ` [PATCH v2 08/15] gpio: pca953x: " Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-02-20  9:57 ` [PATCH v2 09/15] gpio: mockup: " Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-02-20  9:57 ` [PATCH v2 10/15] gpio: aggregator: " Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-02-20  9:57 ` [PATCH v2 11/15] gpio: max77650: " Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-02-20  9:57 ` [PATCH v2 12/15] gpio: latch: use lock guards Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-02-20  9:57 ` [PATCH v2 13/15] gpio: latch: use value returning setters Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-02-20  9:57 ` [PATCH v2 14/15] gpio: davinci: " Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-02-20  9:57 ` [PATCH v2 15/15] gpio: mvebu: " Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-02-21  9:33 ` [PATCH v2 00/15] gpiolib: indicate errors in value setters Uwe Kleine-König
2025-02-26 10:19 ` Bartosz Golaszewski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250220-gpio-set-retval-v2-4-bc4cfd38dae3@linaro.org \
    --to=brgl@bgdev.pl \
    --cc=bamv2005@gmail.com \
    --cc=bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org \
    --cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
    --cc=j-keerthy@ti.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mwalle@kernel.org \
    --cc=ukleinek@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).