* [PATCH v3 0/2] Add LPS0 check() for pinctrl-amd
@ 2025-02-27 20:50 Mario Limonciello
2025-02-27 20:50 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] pinctrl: amd: Add an LPS0 check() callback Mario Limonciello
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Mario Limonciello @ 2025-02-27 20:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mario.limonciello, Basavaraj.Natikar, linus.walleij, rafael,
Shyam-sundar.S-k
Cc: linux-acpi, linux-gpio
From: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
During suspend the pinctrl_amd driver disables the interrupts for
any GPIOs that are not marked as wake sources.
This however does not prevent them from changing the wake status
bit during suspend, it just stops the system from waking.
If the system wakes from hardware sleep for another reason (such
as plugging in the AC adapter) this wake bits might be active.
This could potentially cause problems with going back to hardware
sleep. Add an extra debugging message when PM debugging is enabled
to help identify if this is happening.
Mario Limonciello (2):
ACPI: Add missing prototype for non CONFIG_SUSPEND/CONFIG_X86 case
pinctrl: amd: Add an LPS0 check() callback
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-amd.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/acpi.h | 9 ++++++++-
2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 2/2] pinctrl: amd: Add an LPS0 check() callback
2025-02-27 20:50 [PATCH v3 0/2] Add LPS0 check() for pinctrl-amd Mario Limonciello
@ 2025-02-27 20:50 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-03-01 22:39 ` kernel test robot
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Mario Limonciello @ 2025-02-27 20:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mario.limonciello, Basavaraj.Natikar, Shyam-sundar.S-k,
linus.walleij
Cc: linux-gpio
From: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
During suspend the pinctrl_amd driver disables the interrupts for
any GPIOs that are not marked as wake sources.
This however does not prevent them from changing the wake status
bit during suspend, it just stops the system from waking.
If the system wakes from hardware sleep for another reason (such
as plugging in the AC adapter) this wake bits might be active.
This could potentially cause problems with going back to hardware
sleep. Add an extra debugging message when PM debugging is enabled
to help identify if this is happening.
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/3929
Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
---
v3:
* Add tag
---
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-amd.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-amd.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-amd.c
index 1d7fdcdec4c85..fdda8d1c4f344 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-amd.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-amd.c
@@ -37,6 +37,8 @@
#include "pinctrl-utils.h"
#include "pinctrl-amd.h"
+static struct amd_gpio *pinctrl_dev;
+
static int amd_gpio_get_direction(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned offset)
{
unsigned long flags;
@@ -909,6 +911,29 @@ static bool amd_gpio_should_save(struct amd_gpio *gpio_dev, unsigned int pin)
return false;
}
+static void amd_gpio_check_pending(void)
+{
+ struct amd_gpio *gpio_dev = pinctrl_dev;
+ struct pinctrl_desc *desc = gpio_dev->pctrl->desc;
+ int i;
+
+ if (!pm_debug_messages_on)
+ return;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < desc->npins; i++) {
+ int pin = desc->pins[i].number;
+ u32 tmp;
+
+ tmp = readl(gpio_dev->base + pin * 4);
+ if (tmp & PIN_IRQ_PENDING)
+ pm_pr_dbg("%s: GPIO %d is active: 0x%x.\n", __func__, pin, tmp);
+ }
+}
+
+static struct acpi_s2idle_dev_ops pinctrl_amd_s2idle_dev_ops = {
+ .check = amd_gpio_check_pending,
+};
+
static int amd_gpio_suspend_hibernate_common(struct device *dev, bool is_suspend)
{
struct amd_gpio *gpio_dev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
@@ -942,6 +967,7 @@ static int amd_gpio_suspend_hibernate_common(struct device *dev, bool is_suspend
static int amd_gpio_suspend(struct device *dev)
{
+ pinctrl_dev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
return amd_gpio_suspend_hibernate_common(dev, true);
}
@@ -1181,6 +1207,7 @@ static int amd_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
platform_set_drvdata(pdev, gpio_dev);
acpi_register_wakeup_handler(gpio_dev->irq, amd_gpio_check_wake, gpio_dev);
+ acpi_register_lps0_dev(&pinctrl_amd_s2idle_dev_ops);
dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "amd gpio driver loaded\n");
return ret;
@@ -1199,6 +1226,7 @@ static void amd_gpio_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
gpiochip_remove(&gpio_dev->gc);
acpi_unregister_wakeup_handler(amd_gpio_check_wake, gpio_dev);
+ acpi_unregister_lps0_dev(&pinctrl_amd_s2idle_dev_ops);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] pinctrl: amd: Add an LPS0 check() callback
2025-02-27 20:50 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] pinctrl: amd: Add an LPS0 check() callback Mario Limonciello
@ 2025-03-01 22:39 ` kernel test robot
2025-03-02 0:28 ` kernel test robot
2025-03-02 7:17 ` kernel test robot
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2025-03-01 22:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mario Limonciello, mario.limonciello, Basavaraj.Natikar,
Shyam-sundar.S-k, linus.walleij
Cc: oe-kbuild-all, linux-gpio
Hi Mario,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on linusw-pinctrl/devel]
[also build test WARNING on linusw-pinctrl/for-next rafael-pm/linux-next rafael-pm/bleeding-edge linus/master v6.14-rc4 next-20250228]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Mario-Limonciello/ACPI-Add-missing-prototype-for-non-CONFIG_SUSPEND-CONFIG_X86-case/20250228-045242
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-pinctrl.git devel
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250227205049.765309-3-superm1%40kernel.org
patch subject: [PATCH v3 2/2] pinctrl: amd: Add an LPS0 check() callback
config: mips-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250302/202503020616.j6juZTqH-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: mips-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250302/202503020616.j6juZTqH-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202503020616.j6juZTqH-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-amd.c:933:15: error: variable 'pinctrl_amd_s2idle_dev_ops' has initializer but incomplete type
933 | static struct acpi_s2idle_dev_ops pinctrl_amd_s2idle_dev_ops = {
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-amd.c:934:10: error: 'struct acpi_s2idle_dev_ops' has no member named 'check'
934 | .check = amd_gpio_check_pending,
| ^~~~~
>> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-amd.c:934:18: warning: excess elements in struct initializer
934 | .check = amd_gpio_check_pending,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-amd.c:934:18: note: (near initialization for 'pinctrl_amd_s2idle_dev_ops')
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-amd.c: In function 'amd_gpio_probe':
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-amd.c:1210:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'acpi_register_lps0_dev' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
1210 | acpi_register_lps0_dev(&pinctrl_amd_s2idle_dev_ops);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-amd.c: In function 'amd_gpio_remove':
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-amd.c:1229:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'acpi_unregister_lps0_dev' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
1229 | acpi_unregister_lps0_dev(&pinctrl_amd_s2idle_dev_ops);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-amd.c: At top level:
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-amd.c:933:35: error: storage size of 'pinctrl_amd_s2idle_dev_ops' isn't known
933 | static struct acpi_s2idle_dev_ops pinctrl_amd_s2idle_dev_ops = {
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
vim +934 drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-amd.c
932
933 static struct acpi_s2idle_dev_ops pinctrl_amd_s2idle_dev_ops = {
> 934 .check = amd_gpio_check_pending,
935 };
936
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] pinctrl: amd: Add an LPS0 check() callback
2025-02-27 20:50 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] pinctrl: amd: Add an LPS0 check() callback Mario Limonciello
2025-03-01 22:39 ` kernel test robot
@ 2025-03-02 0:28 ` kernel test robot
2025-03-02 7:17 ` kernel test robot
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2025-03-02 0:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mario Limonciello, mario.limonciello, Basavaraj.Natikar,
Shyam-sundar.S-k, linus.walleij
Cc: oe-kbuild-all, linux-gpio
Hi Mario,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on linusw-pinctrl/devel]
[also build test ERROR on linusw-pinctrl/for-next rafael-pm/linux-next rafael-pm/bleeding-edge linus/master v6.14-rc4 next-20250228]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Mario-Limonciello/ACPI-Add-missing-prototype-for-non-CONFIG_SUSPEND-CONFIG_X86-case/20250228-045242
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-pinctrl.git devel
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250227205049.765309-3-superm1%40kernel.org
patch subject: [PATCH v3 2/2] pinctrl: amd: Add an LPS0 check() callback
config: hexagon-randconfig-r062-20250302 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250302/202503020849.ZhLZ4W63-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 21.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 14170b16028c087ca154878f5ed93d3089a965c6)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250302/202503020849.ZhLZ4W63-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202503020849.ZhLZ4W63-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-amd.c:1210:2: error: call to undeclared function 'acpi_register_lps0_dev'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
1210 | acpi_register_lps0_dev(&pinctrl_amd_s2idle_dev_ops);
| ^
>> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-amd.c:1210:26: error: use of undeclared identifier 'pinctrl_amd_s2idle_dev_ops'
1210 | acpi_register_lps0_dev(&pinctrl_amd_s2idle_dev_ops);
| ^
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-amd.c:1229:2: error: call to undeclared function 'acpi_unregister_lps0_dev'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
1229 | acpi_unregister_lps0_dev(&pinctrl_amd_s2idle_dev_ops);
| ^
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-amd.c:1229:28: error: use of undeclared identifier 'pinctrl_amd_s2idle_dev_ops'
1229 | acpi_unregister_lps0_dev(&pinctrl_amd_s2idle_dev_ops);
| ^
4 errors generated.
vim +/pinctrl_amd_s2idle_dev_ops +1210 drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-amd.c
1151
1152 gpio_dev->pdev = pdev;
1153 gpio_dev->gc.get_direction = amd_gpio_get_direction;
1154 gpio_dev->gc.direction_input = amd_gpio_direction_input;
1155 gpio_dev->gc.direction_output = amd_gpio_direction_output;
1156 gpio_dev->gc.get = amd_gpio_get_value;
1157 gpio_dev->gc.set = amd_gpio_set_value;
1158 gpio_dev->gc.set_config = amd_gpio_set_config;
1159 gpio_dev->gc.dbg_show = amd_gpio_dbg_show;
1160
1161 gpio_dev->gc.base = -1;
1162 gpio_dev->gc.label = pdev->name;
1163 gpio_dev->gc.owner = THIS_MODULE;
1164 gpio_dev->gc.parent = &pdev->dev;
1165 gpio_dev->gc.ngpio = resource_size(res) / 4;
1166
1167 gpio_dev->hwbank_num = gpio_dev->gc.ngpio / 64;
1168 gpio_dev->groups = kerncz_groups;
1169 gpio_dev->ngroups = ARRAY_SIZE(kerncz_groups);
1170
1171 amd_pinctrl_desc.name = dev_name(&pdev->dev);
1172 amd_get_iomux_res(gpio_dev);
1173 gpio_dev->pctrl = devm_pinctrl_register(&pdev->dev, &amd_pinctrl_desc,
1174 gpio_dev);
1175 if (IS_ERR(gpio_dev->pctrl)) {
1176 dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Couldn't register pinctrl driver\n");
1177 return PTR_ERR(gpio_dev->pctrl);
1178 }
1179
1180 /* Disable and mask interrupts */
1181 amd_gpio_irq_init(gpio_dev);
1182
1183 girq = &gpio_dev->gc.irq;
1184 gpio_irq_chip_set_chip(girq, &amd_gpio_irqchip);
1185 /* This will let us handle the parent IRQ in the driver */
1186 girq->parent_handler = NULL;
1187 girq->num_parents = 0;
1188 girq->parents = NULL;
1189 girq->default_type = IRQ_TYPE_NONE;
1190 girq->handler = handle_simple_irq;
1191
1192 ret = gpiochip_add_data(&gpio_dev->gc, gpio_dev);
1193 if (ret)
1194 return ret;
1195
1196 ret = gpiochip_add_pin_range(&gpio_dev->gc, dev_name(&pdev->dev),
1197 0, 0, gpio_dev->gc.ngpio);
1198 if (ret) {
1199 dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to add pin range\n");
1200 goto out2;
1201 }
1202
1203 ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, gpio_dev->irq, amd_gpio_irq_handler,
1204 IRQF_SHARED | IRQF_COND_ONESHOT, KBUILD_MODNAME, gpio_dev);
1205 if (ret)
1206 goto out2;
1207
1208 platform_set_drvdata(pdev, gpio_dev);
1209 acpi_register_wakeup_handler(gpio_dev->irq, amd_gpio_check_wake, gpio_dev);
> 1210 acpi_register_lps0_dev(&pinctrl_amd_s2idle_dev_ops);
1211
1212 dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "amd gpio driver loaded\n");
1213 return ret;
1214
1215 out2:
1216 gpiochip_remove(&gpio_dev->gc);
1217
1218 return ret;
1219 }
1220
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] pinctrl: amd: Add an LPS0 check() callback
2025-02-27 20:50 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] pinctrl: amd: Add an LPS0 check() callback Mario Limonciello
2025-03-01 22:39 ` kernel test robot
2025-03-02 0:28 ` kernel test robot
@ 2025-03-02 7:17 ` kernel test robot
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2025-03-02 7:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mario Limonciello, mario.limonciello, Basavaraj.Natikar,
Shyam-sundar.S-k, linus.walleij
Cc: oe-kbuild-all, linux-gpio
Hi Mario,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on linusw-pinctrl/devel]
[also build test ERROR on linusw-pinctrl/for-next rafael-pm/linux-next rafael-pm/bleeding-edge linus/master v6.14-rc4 next-20250228]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Mario-Limonciello/ACPI-Add-missing-prototype-for-non-CONFIG_SUSPEND-CONFIG_X86-case/20250228-045242
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-pinctrl.git devel
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250227205049.765309-3-superm1%40kernel.org
patch subject: [PATCH v3 2/2] pinctrl: amd: Add an LPS0 check() callback
config: mips-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250302/202503021444.b3oW30XQ-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: mips-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250302/202503021444.b3oW30XQ-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202503021444.b3oW30XQ-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-amd.c:933:15: error: variable 'pinctrl_amd_s2idle_dev_ops' has initializer but incomplete type
933 | static struct acpi_s2idle_dev_ops pinctrl_amd_s2idle_dev_ops = {
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-amd.c:934:10: error: 'struct acpi_s2idle_dev_ops' has no member named 'check'
934 | .check = amd_gpio_check_pending,
| ^~~~~
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-amd.c:934:18: warning: excess elements in struct initializer
934 | .check = amd_gpio_check_pending,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-amd.c:934:18: note: (near initialization for 'pinctrl_amd_s2idle_dev_ops')
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-amd.c: In function 'amd_gpio_probe':
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-amd.c:1210:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'acpi_register_lps0_dev' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
1210 | acpi_register_lps0_dev(&pinctrl_amd_s2idle_dev_ops);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-amd.c: In function 'amd_gpio_remove':
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-amd.c:1229:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'acpi_unregister_lps0_dev' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
1229 | acpi_unregister_lps0_dev(&pinctrl_amd_s2idle_dev_ops);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-amd.c: At top level:
>> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-amd.c:933:35: error: storage size of 'pinctrl_amd_s2idle_dev_ops' isn't known
933 | static struct acpi_s2idle_dev_ops pinctrl_amd_s2idle_dev_ops = {
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
vim +/pinctrl_amd_s2idle_dev_ops +933 drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-amd.c
932
> 933 static struct acpi_s2idle_dev_ops pinctrl_amd_s2idle_dev_ops = {
> 934 .check = amd_gpio_check_pending,
935 };
936
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-03-02 7:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-02-27 20:50 [PATCH v3 0/2] Add LPS0 check() for pinctrl-amd Mario Limonciello
2025-02-27 20:50 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] pinctrl: amd: Add an LPS0 check() callback Mario Limonciello
2025-03-01 22:39 ` kernel test robot
2025-03-02 0:28 ` kernel test robot
2025-03-02 7:17 ` kernel test robot
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).