From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 594F62B2D7; Sun, 2 Mar 2025 03:44:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.15 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1740887061; cv=none; b=kBJc2ue46cRdPwcbP15sxW2vrDXRNpa3yizOlAg5I3+/AoZ7oh4i6WhDOLRz7aUqwc5fEyVN+Cqpq15RdwDdLfVy9xaOaS4qKL8Ex7nnzgYkFnDdzap7kPzckADPereOS+/8czc26E9VvvqhyQhm0sgmLP9qRwrcb6/Cifern1w= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1740887061; c=relaxed/simple; bh=m3N4VQ/oe6q2C/cxszgUZu9Og5nAv5g4t/VlK/KxkVI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=jbq253OW6sWbnrTNQCVLCZjdW3ovSVsKluMcZ0Iw8yFBC452A1ixLUzX7h555eQp9pWfh4vMFGm3vfZNbXMm53SnP8551qctqhTU1jSDtxxhgDyb6Ke8lP0kmotyW/9V1C4768WZ2uzwZSiboxuaxUDgY7ImIppbeMHLD1YbkAE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=hY8T9ApX; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.15 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="hY8T9ApX" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1740887059; x=1772423059; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=m3N4VQ/oe6q2C/cxszgUZu9Og5nAv5g4t/VlK/KxkVI=; b=hY8T9ApXGsQafUP6wOMdO2jH29agq74h7F9KcVPAVt0j4/5R3i9uxYKh b6xpPsD7/T+SuGcMRYIEIsunMWrVYB8xAzpQx7YGYoHnTCCnMyHnTgnB1 wtOo/dRUCNDSgcf2aFKay6AbOhidfZ/yrs+m7/qEzFlWNVbFuD1Kj3uD2 zvnOMzxWwTLxdGnMcTgchdVzY1exp44jx4ftr6Yyh4j35kG5ITPygu7J2 s6hwk4aOHmjSicxE8iOLCS19dz+TDfZ54G6j8wN6XpsEFtNA1XrVhvkNP SrpXgt3ABYA/eTxLwxznQ4OHWe34cQ+qmsVxSqLsVuqhPgI6sPJZSAOmx w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: UBpKiwJKTmipPfzZHeNIZw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: RqKUJ26KRryq2x2I7Air2w== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11360"; a="41905486" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.13,326,1732608000"; d="scan'208";a="41905486" Received: from fmviesa009.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.149]) by fmvoesa109.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 01 Mar 2025 19:44:18 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: HXhVAiSRSJqyyC01ZRIg1A== X-CSE-MsgGUID: wEDPsAapQt+6rQTrafEGGw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.13,326,1732608000"; d="scan'208";a="118371674" Received: from lkp-server02.sh.intel.com (HELO 76cde6cc1f07) ([10.239.97.151]) by fmviesa009.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 01 Mar 2025 19:44:14 -0800 Received: from kbuild by 76cde6cc1f07 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1toaFA-000H0c-0N; Sun, 02 Mar 2025 03:44:03 +0000 Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2025 11:42:56 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Pratap Nirujogi , linus.walleij@linaro.org Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, benjamin.chan@amd.com, Pratap Nirujogi Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: amd: isp411: Add amdisp GPIO pinctrl Message-ID: <202503021137.LAkq3bMU-lkp@intel.com> References: <20250228165749.3476210-1-pratap.nirujogi@amd.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250228165749.3476210-1-pratap.nirujogi@amd.com> Hi Pratap, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on linusw-pinctrl/devel] [also build test WARNING on linusw-pinctrl/for-next linus/master v6.14-rc4 next-20250228] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Pratap-Nirujogi/pinctrl-amd-isp411-Add-amdisp-GPIO-pinctrl/20250301-011050 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-pinctrl.git devel patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250228165749.3476210-1-pratap.nirujogi%40amd.com patch subject: [PATCH] pinctrl: amd: isp411: Add amdisp GPIO pinctrl config: um-randconfig-r112-20250302 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250302/202503021137.LAkq3bMU-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 21.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 14170b16028c087ca154878f5ed93d3089a965c6) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250302/202503021137.LAkq3bMU-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202503021137.LAkq3bMU-lkp@intel.com/ sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) >> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-amdisp.c:113:26: sparse: sparse: symbol 'amdisp_pinctrl_ops' was not declared. Should it be static? vim +/amdisp_pinctrl_ops +113 drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-amdisp.c 112 > 113 const struct pinctrl_ops amdisp_pinctrl_ops = { 114 .get_groups_count = amdisp_get_groups_count, 115 .get_group_name = amdisp_get_group_name, 116 .get_group_pins = amdisp_get_group_pins, 117 }; 118 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki