linux-gpio.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
To: "Ahmad Fatoum" <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>,
	"Kent Gibson" <warthog618@gmail.com>,
	"Jan Lübbe" <jlu@pengutronix.de>, "Marek Vasut" <marex@denx.de>,
	"Geert Uytterhoeven" <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
	"Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	"Bartosz Golaszewski" <brgl@bgdev.pl>
Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH RFC/RFT 12/15] gpio: sysfs: don't look up exported lines as class devices
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 16:38:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250610-gpio-sysfs-chip-export-v1-12-a8c7aa4478b1@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250610-gpio-sysfs-chip-export-v1-0-a8c7aa4478b1@linaro.org>

From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>

In preparation for adding a parallel, per-chip attribute group for
exported GPIO lines, stop using class device APIs to refer to it in the
code. When unregistering the chip, don't call class_find_device() but
instead store exported lines in a linked list inside the GPIO chip data
object and look it up there.

Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpiolib-sysfs.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-sysfs.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-sysfs.c
index 398cefb4be9e389a820dd53f79c82fa70783b5e0..aa998d9e96cce5d64784645eea73f987471c7285 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-sysfs.c
@@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ enum {
 
 struct gpiod_data {
 	struct gpio_desc *desc;
+	struct device *dev;
 
 	struct mutex mutex;
 	struct kernfs_node *value_class_node;
@@ -58,12 +59,15 @@ struct gpiod_data {
 	struct attribute *attrs[GPIO_SYSFS_LINE_ATTR_SIZE];
 	struct attribute_group attr_group;
 	const struct attribute_group *attr_groups[2];
+
+	struct list_head list;
 };
 
 struct gpiodev_data {
 	struct gpio_device *gdev;
 	struct device *cdev_base; /* Class device by GPIO base */
 	struct device *cdev_id; /* Class device by GPIO device ID */
+	struct list_head exported_lines;
 };
 
 /*
@@ -686,10 +690,10 @@ static void gpiod_attr_init(struct device_attribute *dev_attr, const char *name,
  */
 int gpiod_export(struct gpio_desc *desc, bool direction_may_change)
 {
+	struct gpiodev_data *gdev_data;
 	struct gpiod_data *desc_data;
 	struct gpio_device *gdev;
 	struct attribute **attrs;
-	struct device *dev;
 	int status;
 
 	/* can't export until sysfs is available ... */
@@ -751,25 +755,40 @@ int gpiod_export(struct gpio_desc *desc, bool direction_may_change)
 	desc_data->attr_group.attrs = desc_data->attrs;
 	desc_data->attr_groups[0] = &desc_data->attr_group;
 
-	dev = device_create_with_groups(&gpio_class, &gdev->dev,
-					MKDEV(0, 0), desc_data,
-					desc_data->attr_groups,
-					"gpio%u", desc_to_gpio(desc));
-	if (IS_ERR(dev)) {
-		status = PTR_ERR(dev);
+	/*
+	 * Note: we need to continue passing desc_data here as there's still
+	 * at least one known user of gpiod_export_link() in the tree. This
+	 * function still uses class_find_device() internally.
+	 */
+	desc_data->dev = device_create_with_groups(&gpio_class, &gdev->dev,
+						   MKDEV(0, 0), desc_data,
+						   desc_data->attr_groups,
+						   "gpio%u",
+						   desc_to_gpio(desc));
+	if (IS_ERR(desc_data->dev)) {
+		status = PTR_ERR(desc_data->dev);
 		goto err_free_data;
 	}
 
-	desc_data->value_class_node = sysfs_get_dirent(dev->kobj.sd, "value");
+	desc_data->value_class_node = sysfs_get_dirent(desc_data->dev->kobj.sd,
+						       "value");
 	if (!desc_data->value_class_node) {
 		status = -ENODEV;
 		goto err_unregister_device;
 	}
 
+	gdev_data = gdev_get_data(gdev);
+	if (!gdev_data) {
+		status = -ENODEV;
+		goto err_unregister_device;
+	}
+
+	list_add(&desc_data->list, &gdev_data->exported_lines);
+
 	return 0;
 
 err_unregister_device:
-	device_unregister(dev);
+	device_unregister(desc_data->dev);
 err_free_data:
 	kfree(desc_data);
 err_clear_bit:
@@ -828,8 +847,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpiod_export_link);
  */
 void gpiod_unexport(struct gpio_desc *desc)
 {
-	struct gpiod_data *desc_data;
-	struct device *dev;
+	struct gpiod_data *desc_data = NULL;
+	struct gpiodev_data *gdev_data;
+	struct gpio_device *gdev;
 
 	if (!desc) {
 		pr_warn("%s: invalid GPIO\n", __func__);
@@ -840,14 +860,22 @@ void gpiod_unexport(struct gpio_desc *desc)
 		if (!test_bit(FLAG_EXPORT, &desc->flags))
 			return;
 
-		dev = class_find_device(&gpio_class, NULL, desc, match_export);
-		if (!dev)
+		gdev = gpiod_to_gpio_device(desc);
+		gdev_data = gdev_get_data(gdev);
+		if (!gdev_data)
 			return;
 
-		desc_data = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+		list_for_each_entry(desc_data, &gdev_data->exported_lines, list)
+			if (desc == desc_data->desc)
+				break;
+
+		if (!desc_data)
+			return;
+
+		list_del(&desc_data->list);
 		clear_bit(FLAG_EXPORT, &desc->flags);
 		sysfs_put(desc_data->value_class_node);
-		device_unregister(dev);
+		device_unregister(desc_data->dev);
 
 		/*
 		 * Release irq after deregistration to prevent race with
@@ -857,7 +885,6 @@ void gpiod_unexport(struct gpio_desc *desc)
 			gpio_sysfs_free_irq(desc_data);
 	}
 
-	put_device(dev);
 	mutex_destroy(&desc_data->mutex);
 	kfree(desc_data);
 }
@@ -898,6 +925,7 @@ int gpiochip_sysfs_register(struct gpio_device *gdev)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
 	data->gdev = gdev;
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&data->exported_lines);
 
 	guard(mutex)(&sysfs_lock);
 

-- 
2.48.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-06-10 14:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-10 14:38 [PATCH RFC/RFT 00/15] gpio: sysfs: add a per-chip export/unexport attribute pair Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-06-10 14:38 ` [PATCH RFC/RFT 01/15] Documentation: gpio: undocument removed behavior Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-06-11  8:15   ` Linus Walleij
2025-06-10 14:38 ` [PATCH RFC/RFT 02/15] Documentation: gpio: document the active_low field in the sysfs ABI Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-06-11  8:15   ` Linus Walleij
2025-06-10 14:38 ` [PATCH RFC/RFT 03/15] gpio: sysfs: call mutex_destroy() in gpiod_unexport() Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-06-11  8:16   ` Linus Walleij
2025-06-10 14:38 ` [PATCH RFC/RFT 04/15] gpio: sysfs: refactor the coding style Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-06-11  8:16   ` Linus Walleij
2025-06-10 14:38 ` [PATCH RFC/RFT 05/15] gpio: sysfs: remove unneeded headers Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-06-11  8:17   ` Linus Walleij
2025-06-10 14:38 ` [PATCH RFC/RFT 06/15] gpio: sysfs: remove the mockdev pointer from struct gpio_device Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-06-11  8:19   ` Linus Walleij
2025-06-10 14:38 ` [PATCH RFC/RFT 07/15] gpio: sysfs: add a parallel class device for each GPIO chip using device IDs Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-06-11  8:27   ` Linus Walleij
2025-06-23  8:02     ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-06-10 14:38 ` [PATCH RFC/RFT 08/15] gpio: sysfs: only get the dirent reference for the value attr once Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-06-10 14:38 ` [PATCH RFC/RFT 09/15] gpio: sysfs: pass gpiod_data directly to internal GPIO sysfs functions Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-06-10 14:38 ` [PATCH RFC/RFT 10/15] gpio: sysfs: don't use driver data in sysfs callbacks for line attributes Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-06-10 14:38 ` [PATCH RFC/RFT 11/15] gpio: sysfs: rename the data variable in gpiod_(un)export() Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-06-10 14:38 ` Bartosz Golaszewski [this message]
2025-06-10 14:38 ` [PATCH RFC/RFT 13/15] gpio: sysfs: export the GPIO directory locally in the gpiochip<id> directory Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-06-10 14:38 ` [PATCH RFC/RFT 14/15] gpio: sysfs: allow disabling the legacy parts of the GPIO sysfs interface Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-06-10 14:38 ` [PATCH RFC/RFT 15/15] gpio: TODO: remove the task for the sysfs rework Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-06-13  8:02 ` [PATCH RFC/RFT 00/15] gpio: sysfs: add a per-chip export/unexport attribute pair Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-06-16 12:27   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-06-18 13:38 ` Jan Lübbe
2025-06-18 14:53   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-06-18 15:56   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-06-23  8:27     ` Jan Lübbe
2025-06-18 14:54 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-06-20  7:30 ` (subset) " Bartosz Golaszewski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250610-gpio-sysfs-chip-export-v1-12-a8c7aa4478b1@linaro.org \
    --to=brgl@bgdev.pl \
    --cc=a.fatoum@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org \
    --cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
    --cc=jlu@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marex@denx.de \
    --cc=warthog618@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).