From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
To: "Ahmad Fatoum" <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>,
"Kent Gibson" <warthog618@gmail.com>,
"Jan Lübbe" <jlu@pengutronix.de>, "Marek Vasut" <marex@denx.de>,
"Geert Uytterhoeven" <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
"Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
"Bartosz Golaszewski" <brgl@bgdev.pl>
Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH RFC/RFT 12/15] gpio: sysfs: don't look up exported lines as class devices
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 16:38:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250610-gpio-sysfs-chip-export-v1-12-a8c7aa4478b1@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250610-gpio-sysfs-chip-export-v1-0-a8c7aa4478b1@linaro.org>
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
In preparation for adding a parallel, per-chip attribute group for
exported GPIO lines, stop using class device APIs to refer to it in the
code. When unregistering the chip, don't call class_find_device() but
instead store exported lines in a linked list inside the GPIO chip data
object and look it up there.
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
---
drivers/gpio/gpiolib-sysfs.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-sysfs.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-sysfs.c
index 398cefb4be9e389a820dd53f79c82fa70783b5e0..aa998d9e96cce5d64784645eea73f987471c7285 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-sysfs.c
@@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ enum {
struct gpiod_data {
struct gpio_desc *desc;
+ struct device *dev;
struct mutex mutex;
struct kernfs_node *value_class_node;
@@ -58,12 +59,15 @@ struct gpiod_data {
struct attribute *attrs[GPIO_SYSFS_LINE_ATTR_SIZE];
struct attribute_group attr_group;
const struct attribute_group *attr_groups[2];
+
+ struct list_head list;
};
struct gpiodev_data {
struct gpio_device *gdev;
struct device *cdev_base; /* Class device by GPIO base */
struct device *cdev_id; /* Class device by GPIO device ID */
+ struct list_head exported_lines;
};
/*
@@ -686,10 +690,10 @@ static void gpiod_attr_init(struct device_attribute *dev_attr, const char *name,
*/
int gpiod_export(struct gpio_desc *desc, bool direction_may_change)
{
+ struct gpiodev_data *gdev_data;
struct gpiod_data *desc_data;
struct gpio_device *gdev;
struct attribute **attrs;
- struct device *dev;
int status;
/* can't export until sysfs is available ... */
@@ -751,25 +755,40 @@ int gpiod_export(struct gpio_desc *desc, bool direction_may_change)
desc_data->attr_group.attrs = desc_data->attrs;
desc_data->attr_groups[0] = &desc_data->attr_group;
- dev = device_create_with_groups(&gpio_class, &gdev->dev,
- MKDEV(0, 0), desc_data,
- desc_data->attr_groups,
- "gpio%u", desc_to_gpio(desc));
- if (IS_ERR(dev)) {
- status = PTR_ERR(dev);
+ /*
+ * Note: we need to continue passing desc_data here as there's still
+ * at least one known user of gpiod_export_link() in the tree. This
+ * function still uses class_find_device() internally.
+ */
+ desc_data->dev = device_create_with_groups(&gpio_class, &gdev->dev,
+ MKDEV(0, 0), desc_data,
+ desc_data->attr_groups,
+ "gpio%u",
+ desc_to_gpio(desc));
+ if (IS_ERR(desc_data->dev)) {
+ status = PTR_ERR(desc_data->dev);
goto err_free_data;
}
- desc_data->value_class_node = sysfs_get_dirent(dev->kobj.sd, "value");
+ desc_data->value_class_node = sysfs_get_dirent(desc_data->dev->kobj.sd,
+ "value");
if (!desc_data->value_class_node) {
status = -ENODEV;
goto err_unregister_device;
}
+ gdev_data = gdev_get_data(gdev);
+ if (!gdev_data) {
+ status = -ENODEV;
+ goto err_unregister_device;
+ }
+
+ list_add(&desc_data->list, &gdev_data->exported_lines);
+
return 0;
err_unregister_device:
- device_unregister(dev);
+ device_unregister(desc_data->dev);
err_free_data:
kfree(desc_data);
err_clear_bit:
@@ -828,8 +847,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpiod_export_link);
*/
void gpiod_unexport(struct gpio_desc *desc)
{
- struct gpiod_data *desc_data;
- struct device *dev;
+ struct gpiod_data *desc_data = NULL;
+ struct gpiodev_data *gdev_data;
+ struct gpio_device *gdev;
if (!desc) {
pr_warn("%s: invalid GPIO\n", __func__);
@@ -840,14 +860,22 @@ void gpiod_unexport(struct gpio_desc *desc)
if (!test_bit(FLAG_EXPORT, &desc->flags))
return;
- dev = class_find_device(&gpio_class, NULL, desc, match_export);
- if (!dev)
+ gdev = gpiod_to_gpio_device(desc);
+ gdev_data = gdev_get_data(gdev);
+ if (!gdev_data)
return;
- desc_data = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+ list_for_each_entry(desc_data, &gdev_data->exported_lines, list)
+ if (desc == desc_data->desc)
+ break;
+
+ if (!desc_data)
+ return;
+
+ list_del(&desc_data->list);
clear_bit(FLAG_EXPORT, &desc->flags);
sysfs_put(desc_data->value_class_node);
- device_unregister(dev);
+ device_unregister(desc_data->dev);
/*
* Release irq after deregistration to prevent race with
@@ -857,7 +885,6 @@ void gpiod_unexport(struct gpio_desc *desc)
gpio_sysfs_free_irq(desc_data);
}
- put_device(dev);
mutex_destroy(&desc_data->mutex);
kfree(desc_data);
}
@@ -898,6 +925,7 @@ int gpiochip_sysfs_register(struct gpio_device *gdev)
return -ENOMEM;
data->gdev = gdev;
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&data->exported_lines);
guard(mutex)(&sysfs_lock);
--
2.48.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-10 14:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-10 14:38 [PATCH RFC/RFT 00/15] gpio: sysfs: add a per-chip export/unexport attribute pair Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-06-10 14:38 ` [PATCH RFC/RFT 01/15] Documentation: gpio: undocument removed behavior Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-06-11 8:15 ` Linus Walleij
2025-06-10 14:38 ` [PATCH RFC/RFT 02/15] Documentation: gpio: document the active_low field in the sysfs ABI Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-06-11 8:15 ` Linus Walleij
2025-06-10 14:38 ` [PATCH RFC/RFT 03/15] gpio: sysfs: call mutex_destroy() in gpiod_unexport() Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-06-11 8:16 ` Linus Walleij
2025-06-10 14:38 ` [PATCH RFC/RFT 04/15] gpio: sysfs: refactor the coding style Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-06-11 8:16 ` Linus Walleij
2025-06-10 14:38 ` [PATCH RFC/RFT 05/15] gpio: sysfs: remove unneeded headers Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-06-11 8:17 ` Linus Walleij
2025-06-10 14:38 ` [PATCH RFC/RFT 06/15] gpio: sysfs: remove the mockdev pointer from struct gpio_device Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-06-11 8:19 ` Linus Walleij
2025-06-10 14:38 ` [PATCH RFC/RFT 07/15] gpio: sysfs: add a parallel class device for each GPIO chip using device IDs Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-06-11 8:27 ` Linus Walleij
2025-06-23 8:02 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-06-10 14:38 ` [PATCH RFC/RFT 08/15] gpio: sysfs: only get the dirent reference for the value attr once Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-06-10 14:38 ` [PATCH RFC/RFT 09/15] gpio: sysfs: pass gpiod_data directly to internal GPIO sysfs functions Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-06-10 14:38 ` [PATCH RFC/RFT 10/15] gpio: sysfs: don't use driver data in sysfs callbacks for line attributes Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-06-10 14:38 ` [PATCH RFC/RFT 11/15] gpio: sysfs: rename the data variable in gpiod_(un)export() Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-06-10 14:38 ` Bartosz Golaszewski [this message]
2025-06-10 14:38 ` [PATCH RFC/RFT 13/15] gpio: sysfs: export the GPIO directory locally in the gpiochip<id> directory Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-06-10 14:38 ` [PATCH RFC/RFT 14/15] gpio: sysfs: allow disabling the legacy parts of the GPIO sysfs interface Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-06-10 14:38 ` [PATCH RFC/RFT 15/15] gpio: TODO: remove the task for the sysfs rework Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-06-13 8:02 ` [PATCH RFC/RFT 00/15] gpio: sysfs: add a per-chip export/unexport attribute pair Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-06-16 12:27 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-06-18 13:38 ` Jan Lübbe
2025-06-18 14:53 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-06-18 15:56 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-06-23 8:27 ` Jan Lübbe
2025-06-18 14:54 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-06-20 7:30 ` (subset) " Bartosz Golaszewski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250610-gpio-sysfs-chip-export-v1-12-a8c7aa4478b1@linaro.org \
--to=brgl@bgdev.pl \
--cc=a.fatoum@pengutronix.de \
--cc=bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=jlu@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marex@denx.de \
--cc=warthog618@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).