From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
To: "Ahmad Fatoum" <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>,
"Kent Gibson" <warthog618@gmail.com>,
"Jan Lübbe" <jlu@pengutronix.de>, "Marek Vasut" <marex@denx.de>,
"Geert Uytterhoeven" <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
"Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
"Bartosz Golaszewski" <brgl@bgdev.pl>
Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH RFC/RFT 08/15] gpio: sysfs: only get the dirent reference for the value attr once
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 16:38:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250610-gpio-sysfs-chip-export-v1-8-a8c7aa4478b1@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250610-gpio-sysfs-chip-export-v1-0-a8c7aa4478b1@linaro.org>
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
There's no reason to retrieve the reference to the sysfs dirent every
time we request an interrupt, we can as well only do it once when
exporting the GPIO.
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
---
drivers/gpio/gpiolib-sysfs.c | 23 +++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-sysfs.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-sysfs.c
index a3403b963d6488aad24e47e9e28e0439676de704..642635c9f84bbd869727755e72781fae31a9cca3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-sysfs.c
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ struct gpiod_data {
struct gpio_desc *desc;
struct mutex mutex;
- struct kernfs_node *value_kn;
+ struct kernfs_node *value_class_node;
int irq;
unsigned char irq_flags;
@@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ static irqreturn_t gpio_sysfs_irq(int irq, void *priv)
{
struct gpiod_data *data = priv;
- sysfs_notify_dirent(data->value_kn);
+ sysfs_notify_dirent(data->value_class_node);
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
@@ -177,10 +177,6 @@ static int gpio_sysfs_request_irq(struct device *dev, unsigned char flags)
if (data->irq < 0)
return -EIO;
- data->value_kn = sysfs_get_dirent(dev->kobj.sd, "value");
- if (!data->value_kn)
- return -ENODEV;
-
irq_flags = IRQF_SHARED;
if (flags & GPIO_IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING) {
irq_flags |= test_bit(FLAG_ACTIVE_LOW, &desc->flags) ?
@@ -203,7 +199,7 @@ static int gpio_sysfs_request_irq(struct device *dev, unsigned char flags)
*/
ret = gpiochip_lock_as_irq(guard.gc, gpio_chip_hwgpio(desc));
if (ret < 0)
- goto err_put_kn;
+ goto err_clr_bits;
ret = request_any_context_irq(data->irq, gpio_sysfs_irq, irq_flags,
"gpiolib", data);
@@ -216,10 +212,9 @@ static int gpio_sysfs_request_irq(struct device *dev, unsigned char flags)
err_unlock:
gpiochip_unlock_as_irq(guard.gc, gpio_chip_hwgpio(desc));
-err_put_kn:
+err_clr_bits:
clear_bit(FLAG_EDGE_RISING, &desc->flags);
clear_bit(FLAG_EDGE_FALLING, &desc->flags);
- sysfs_put(data->value_kn);
return ret;
}
@@ -242,7 +237,6 @@ static void gpio_sysfs_free_irq(struct device *dev)
gpiochip_unlock_as_irq(guard.gc, gpio_chip_hwgpio(desc));
clear_bit(FLAG_EDGE_RISING, &desc->flags);
clear_bit(FLAG_EDGE_FALLING, &desc->flags);
- sysfs_put(data->value_kn);
}
static const char *const trigger_names[] = {
@@ -726,8 +720,16 @@ int gpiod_export(struct gpio_desc *desc, bool direction_may_change)
goto err_free_data;
}
+ data->value_class_node = sysfs_get_dirent(dev->kobj.sd, "value");
+ if (!data->value_class_node) {
+ status = -ENODEV;
+ goto err_unregister_device;
+ }
+
return 0;
+err_unregister_device:
+ device_unregister(dev);
err_free_data:
kfree(data);
err_clear_bit:
@@ -804,6 +806,7 @@ void gpiod_unexport(struct gpio_desc *desc)
data = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
clear_bit(FLAG_EXPORT, &desc->flags);
+ sysfs_put(data->value_class_node);
device_unregister(dev);
/*
--
2.48.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-10 14:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-10 14:38 [PATCH RFC/RFT 00/15] gpio: sysfs: add a per-chip export/unexport attribute pair Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-06-10 14:38 ` [PATCH RFC/RFT 01/15] Documentation: gpio: undocument removed behavior Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-06-11 8:15 ` Linus Walleij
2025-06-10 14:38 ` [PATCH RFC/RFT 02/15] Documentation: gpio: document the active_low field in the sysfs ABI Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-06-11 8:15 ` Linus Walleij
2025-06-10 14:38 ` [PATCH RFC/RFT 03/15] gpio: sysfs: call mutex_destroy() in gpiod_unexport() Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-06-11 8:16 ` Linus Walleij
2025-06-10 14:38 ` [PATCH RFC/RFT 04/15] gpio: sysfs: refactor the coding style Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-06-11 8:16 ` Linus Walleij
2025-06-10 14:38 ` [PATCH RFC/RFT 05/15] gpio: sysfs: remove unneeded headers Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-06-11 8:17 ` Linus Walleij
2025-06-10 14:38 ` [PATCH RFC/RFT 06/15] gpio: sysfs: remove the mockdev pointer from struct gpio_device Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-06-11 8:19 ` Linus Walleij
2025-06-10 14:38 ` [PATCH RFC/RFT 07/15] gpio: sysfs: add a parallel class device for each GPIO chip using device IDs Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-06-11 8:27 ` Linus Walleij
2025-06-23 8:02 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-06-10 14:38 ` Bartosz Golaszewski [this message]
2025-06-10 14:38 ` [PATCH RFC/RFT 09/15] gpio: sysfs: pass gpiod_data directly to internal GPIO sysfs functions Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-06-10 14:38 ` [PATCH RFC/RFT 10/15] gpio: sysfs: don't use driver data in sysfs callbacks for line attributes Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-06-10 14:38 ` [PATCH RFC/RFT 11/15] gpio: sysfs: rename the data variable in gpiod_(un)export() Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-06-10 14:38 ` [PATCH RFC/RFT 12/15] gpio: sysfs: don't look up exported lines as class devices Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-06-10 14:38 ` [PATCH RFC/RFT 13/15] gpio: sysfs: export the GPIO directory locally in the gpiochip<id> directory Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-06-10 14:38 ` [PATCH RFC/RFT 14/15] gpio: sysfs: allow disabling the legacy parts of the GPIO sysfs interface Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-06-10 14:38 ` [PATCH RFC/RFT 15/15] gpio: TODO: remove the task for the sysfs rework Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-06-13 8:02 ` [PATCH RFC/RFT 00/15] gpio: sysfs: add a per-chip export/unexport attribute pair Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-06-16 12:27 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-06-18 13:38 ` Jan Lübbe
2025-06-18 14:53 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-06-18 15:56 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-06-23 8:27 ` Jan Lübbe
2025-06-18 14:54 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-06-20 7:30 ` (subset) " Bartosz Golaszewski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250610-gpio-sysfs-chip-export-v1-8-a8c7aa4478b1@linaro.org \
--to=brgl@bgdev.pl \
--cc=a.fatoum@pengutronix.de \
--cc=bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=jlu@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marex@denx.de \
--cc=warthog618@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).