From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@oss.nxp.com>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Cc: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>,
Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@nxp.com>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>, Jacky Bai <ping.bai@nxp.com>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
"arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org" <arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
"imx@lists.linux.dev" <imx@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] firmware: arm_scmi: bus: Bypass setting fwnode for scmi cpufreq
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 11:58:16 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250620035816.GA21846@nxa18884-linux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250422-vigorous-cockatoo-of-growth-bacdb7@sudeepholla>
Hi Sudeep,
On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 11:16:44AM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>On Sun, Apr 20, 2025 at 10:09:44PM +0800, Peng Fan wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 03:26:42PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>>
>> >Revert to old behaviour and driver request fw_devlink dependencies to
>> >be created if they rely on them. I am not sure if that is better approach.
>>
>> This requires to update various drivers(clk,power,perf,pinctrl,regulator) to
>> set the flag SCMI_DEV_SET_FWNODE.
>>
>> Using SCMI_DEV_NO_FWNODE would avoid updating the various drivers.
>>
>
>Agreed and good point.
>
>> Anyway, you decide which to go :)
>
>Still undecided 🙁
Is this still in you list?
Thanks,
Peng.
>
>--
>Regards,
>Sudeep
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-20 2:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-25 8:20 [PATCH 0/4] scmi: Bypass set fwnode to address devlink issue Peng Fan (OSS)
2024-12-25 8:20 ` [PATCH 1/4] firmware: arm_scmi: bus: Bypass setting fwnode for scmi cpufreq Peng Fan (OSS)
2024-12-27 15:13 ` Sudeep Holla
2024-12-30 2:05 ` Peng Fan
2024-12-31 18:07 ` Cristian Marussi
2025-01-02 7:38 ` Peng Fan
2025-01-02 17:06 ` Cristian Marussi
2025-01-06 4:37 ` Peng Fan
2025-02-11 17:13 ` Sudeep Holla
2025-02-12 7:01 ` Peng Fan
2025-02-12 10:48 ` Sudeep Holla
2025-02-13 8:03 ` Saravana Kannan
2025-02-13 20:23 ` Cristian Marussi
2025-02-18 1:09 ` Peng Fan
2025-02-18 10:24 ` Sudeep Holla
2025-02-18 13:36 ` Peng Fan
2025-02-19 10:17 ` Sudeep Holla
2025-02-20 0:59 ` Peng Fan
2025-03-10 9:29 ` Sudeep Holla
2025-03-10 10:45 ` Peng Fan
2025-03-10 11:59 ` Sudeep Holla
2025-03-10 13:41 ` Sudeep Holla
2025-03-11 8:36 ` Peng Fan
2025-03-11 11:12 ` Peng Fan
2025-03-11 11:23 ` Sudeep Holla
2025-03-12 10:52 ` Sudeep Holla
2025-03-12 11:28 ` Sudeep Holla
2025-03-13 5:23 ` Peng Fan
2025-04-09 3:50 ` Peng Fan
2025-04-09 11:14 ` Sudeep Holla
2025-04-17 14:26 ` Sudeep Holla
2025-04-20 14:09 ` Peng Fan
2025-04-22 10:16 ` Sudeep Holla
2025-06-20 3:58 ` Peng Fan [this message]
2024-12-25 8:20 ` [PATCH 2/4] firmware: arm_scmi: bus: Bypass setting fwnode for pinctrl Peng Fan (OSS)
2024-12-27 15:28 ` Sudeep Holla
2024-12-30 2:08 ` Peng Fan
2024-12-31 18:16 ` Cristian Marussi
2025-01-06 4:41 ` Peng Fan
2025-01-14 8:31 ` Peng Fan
2025-01-14 10:07 ` Cristian Marussi
2025-01-15 7:22 ` Peng Fan
2024-12-31 18:13 ` Cristian Marussi
2024-12-25 8:20 ` [PATCH 3/4] pinctrl: scmi: Check fwnode instead of machine compatible Peng Fan (OSS)
2024-12-27 15:30 ` Sudeep Holla
2024-12-31 18:18 ` Cristian Marussi
2025-01-02 7:11 ` Peng Fan
2024-12-25 8:20 ` [PATCH 4/4] pinctrl: freescale: " Peng Fan (OSS)
2024-12-27 17:06 ` [PATCH 0/4] scmi: Bypass set fwnode to address devlink issue Linus Walleij
2024-12-30 2:12 ` Peng Fan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250620035816.GA21846@nxa18884-linux \
--to=peng.fan@oss.nxp.com \
--cc=aisheng.dong@nxp.com \
--cc=arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peng.fan@nxp.com \
--cc=ping.bai@nxp.com \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=saravanak@google.com \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).