From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79DA21D5178; Tue, 26 Aug 2025 06:02:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.16 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1756188128; cv=none; b=jCvK0cOIeKgDgAAPwQB9I5kaD3+dUlKMt2/zKGqrljupv/3S5u1kSOnIdiAGIkBxz3oxXxSqbsKvCsnbIsWwFKlSSvHwgEqy1wQnxdKccXft5y9b1J/74uqCKWHeAL5P51vvMmmpz1Ii2P3w5mEq8x6/xm32QsttCBnneWtzYAM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1756188128; c=relaxed/simple; bh=/NAbA3KKPlkGUVLEW64dW+p7Ub0Umd/LU/ByfgYQHFI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=h4b0vUTXXa53csTDUxmJ4p43lwXpysgmiZnHFdvDre2qGdZK+lCbfp1VXeBFqoNyTXe1eVTF7Ou8DMSA7lFWWB0D59OyqH5Ud4OiAMNX9ymERxc0jSOU8QpuHwTR8IT7yLJ7Y7KUZrhZXgwrttLNXDN4z3ZZChMTwEO2qTW8Vvc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=TSSJUf+V; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.16 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="TSSJUf+V" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1756188126; x=1787724126; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=/NAbA3KKPlkGUVLEW64dW+p7Ub0Umd/LU/ByfgYQHFI=; b=TSSJUf+V5hz5I1NHQD0i0xZ1uDcJgRm60cJmcj8yWTWygIfwdibGjvs8 5iSznAOW68X3Bcs96CwKVM/uDeuZusLIyzIY6y4IRH8HZoYkwz8JWJnD9 uQ0a2dNaIEft6DurwXNsMDCK3U1jGZT+UJq6XxvLAgFaICzK5p3ScXYpc GyPEkOPzVzkBXC8hUWTKUdjUgQPS8nOQyTjZv3P6aefpQj2uCcEGSNSmC eLWv6DW7dOFZ/qDZI7sWSihCBf7P7AQRtQRtju9lMTefMbsLrq5yJ7Wcx gxMrkLARZclPDIg12B8dufakb3kijovrFvjhRhjPE5fdtAk39nIZtvj2X Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: awJM9WHWTyaZIfYAzUbxJQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: gKuj3Oe8QH6OaAgwSBH/Iw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11533"; a="45989821" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.18,214,1751266800"; d="scan'208";a="45989821" Received: from orviesa008.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.148]) by fmvoesa110.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 Aug 2025 23:02:05 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: dBjAjTnISYmtD9zAf5DjAg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: aLP9yIKGRpqcaAGSsX+lxw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.18,214,1751266800"; d="scan'208";a="169654456" Received: from lkp-server02.sh.intel.com (HELO 4ea60e6ab079) ([10.239.97.151]) by orviesa008.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 25 Aug 2025 23:02:02 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 4ea60e6ab079 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1uqmkp-000OG7-0N; Tue, 26 Aug 2025 06:01:59 +0000 Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2025 14:01:15 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Nickolay Goppen , Bjorn Andersson , Linus Walleij , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, ~postmarketos/upstreaming@lists.sr.ht, Nickolay Goppen , Richard Acayan Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] pinctrl: qcom: Add SDM660 LPASS LPI TLMM Message-ID: <202508261333.8hcdJOVB-lkp@intel.com> References: <20250824-sdm660-lpass-lpi-v1-3-003d5cc28234@yandex.ru> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250824-sdm660-lpass-lpi-v1-3-003d5cc28234@yandex.ru> Hi Nickolay, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on 038d61fd642278bab63ee8ef722c50d10ab01e8f] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Nickolay-Goppen/pinctrl-qcom-lpass-lpi-Introduce-pin_offset-callback/20250825-045348 base: 038d61fd642278bab63ee8ef722c50d10ab01e8f patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250824-sdm660-lpass-lpi-v1-3-003d5cc28234%40yandex.ru patch subject: [PATCH 3/3] pinctrl: qcom: Add SDM660 LPASS LPI TLMM config: microblaze-randconfig-r123-20250826 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250826/202508261333.8hcdJOVB-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: microblaze-linux-gcc (GCC) 9.5.0 reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250826/202508261333.8hcdJOVB-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202508261333.8hcdJOVB-lkp@intel.com/ sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) >> drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-sdm660-lpass-lpi.c:110:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sdm660_lpi_pinctrl_groups' was not declared. Should it be static? >> drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-sdm660-lpass-lpi.c:148:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sdm660_lpi_pinctrl_functions' was not declared. Should it be static? vim +/sdm660_lpi_pinctrl_groups +110 drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-sdm660-lpass-lpi.c 109 > 110 const struct lpi_pingroup sdm660_lpi_pinctrl_groups[] = { 111 LPI_PINGROUP(0, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _), 112 LPI_PINGROUP(1, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _), 113 LPI_PINGROUP(2, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _), 114 LPI_PINGROUP(3, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _), 115 LPI_PINGROUP(4, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _), 116 LPI_PINGROUP(5, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _), 117 LPI_PINGROUP(6, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _), 118 LPI_PINGROUP(7, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _), 119 LPI_PINGROUP(8, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _), 120 LPI_PINGROUP(9, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _), 121 LPI_PINGROUP(10, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _), 122 LPI_PINGROUP(11, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _), 123 LPI_PINGROUP(12, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _), 124 LPI_PINGROUP(13, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _), 125 LPI_PINGROUP(14, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _), 126 LPI_PINGROUP(15, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _), 127 LPI_PINGROUP(16, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _), 128 LPI_PINGROUP(17, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _), 129 130 /* The function names of the PDM GPIOs are derived from SDM670 */ 131 LPI_PINGROUP(18, LPI_NO_SLEW, pdm_clk, mclk0, _, _), 132 LPI_PINGROUP(19, LPI_NO_SLEW, pdm_sync, _, _, _), 133 LPI_PINGROUP(20, LPI_NO_SLEW, pdm_2_gpios, _, _, _), 134 LPI_PINGROUP(21, LPI_NO_SLEW, pdm_rx, _, _, _), 135 LPI_PINGROUP(22, LPI_NO_SLEW, comp_rx, _, _, _), 136 LPI_PINGROUP(23, LPI_NO_SLEW, pdm_rx, _, _, _), 137 LPI_PINGROUP(24, LPI_NO_SLEW, comp_rx, _, _, _), 138 LPI_PINGROUP(25, LPI_NO_SLEW, pdm_rx, _, _, _), 139 LPI_PINGROUP(26, LPI_NO_SLEW, dmic12, _, _, _), 140 LPI_PINGROUP(27, LPI_NO_SLEW, dmic34, _, _, _), 141 LPI_PINGROUP(28, LPI_NO_SLEW, dmic12, _, _, _), 142 LPI_PINGROUP(29, LPI_NO_SLEW, dmic34, _, _, _), 143 144 LPI_PINGROUP(30, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _), 145 LPI_PINGROUP(31, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _), 146 }; 147 > 148 const struct lpi_function sdm660_lpi_pinctrl_functions[] = { 149 LPI_FUNCTION(comp_rx), 150 LPI_FUNCTION(dmic12), 151 LPI_FUNCTION(dmic34), 152 LPI_FUNCTION(mclk0), 153 LPI_FUNCTION(pdm_2_gpios), 154 LPI_FUNCTION(pdm_clk), 155 LPI_FUNCTION(pdm_rx), 156 LPI_FUNCTION(pdm_sync), 157 }; 158 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki